Skip to main content
Log in

Who stays? who leaves? an examination of sex differences in staying and leaving

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines some of the major variables associated with the “staying” and “leaving” process, particularly as it operates similarly or differentially for male and female adolescents. Sixty attitude statements about aspects of school, parents, peers, teachers, and value orientations were obtained from 796 adolescents and factor analyzed. This subset of independent variables, together with a set of personality and ability measures, was then used to predict “staying” or “leaving” status. The discriminant analysis was undertaken using “leaving” status and sex (LVSEX) as the dependent variable. Using a stepwise solution method of discriminant analysis, two significant functions were identified-the first suggesting a sex dimension, the second a stayer-leaver dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlstrom, W. M., and Havighurst, R. M. (1971).400 Losers, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council of Trade Unions (1975).Survey of Young Workers: Research Report by Australian Council of Trade Unions, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G. (1972). Dropouts are losers, says who?Today's Educ. 61(4): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Green, S., and Wirtanen, I. D. (1976).Youth in Transition. Volume III, Dropping Out — Problem or Symptom? Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1952). Success and failure in the classroom.Progress. Educ. 19: 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, N. (1978). Schooling and work. In Commission of Inquiry into Poverty,School, Community and Work: Urban and Rural Aspects, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham Educational Development Centre (1971).Challenge and Change, Raising of the School Leaving Age, E.D.C. Project 1.

  • Brookover, W. B., Thomas, S., and Paterson, A. (1964). Self concept of ability and school achievement.Sociol. Educ. 37: 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilman, C. S. (1959). A comparative study of measured personality needs and self-perceived problems of ninth and tenth grade students: Half of the group possessing characteristics associated with early school leaving and the other half not possessing such characteristics. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.

  • Committee on Higher Education (1963).Higher Education (The Robbins Report), H. M. Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, W. F., Stroobant, R. E., Sinclair, K. E., Connell, R. W., and Rogers, K. W. (1975).12 to 20: Studies of City Youth, Hicks Smith & Sons, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. S., Jr. (1956). An analysis of factors related to withdrawal from high school prior to graduation.J. Educ. Res. 50: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1967).The Antecedents of Self-Esteem, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. W. B. (1964).The Home and the School, MacGibbon & Kee, London, pp. 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, B. (1965).Family Factors and School Dropouts: 1920–1960, Cooperative Research Project No. 2258, University of Michigan, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, D. S., Voss, H. L., and Wendling, A. (1966). Capable dropouts and the social milieu of the high school.J. Educ. Res. 60: 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B. G. (1965).Manual for the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory, University of London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallworth, H. J. (1961). Teachers' personality ratings of high school pupils.J. Educ. Psychol. 52: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H., and Gardner, L. (1953). Selection for secondary education and achievement in four grammar schools.Br. J. Social. 4: 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. C., and Clawson, E. H. (1975). Dropouts: then and now.Educ. Digest 51(1): 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B., and Marsden, D. (1962).Education and the Working Class, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. (1977). Factors affecting school leaving and work decisions for girls. In Commission of Inquiry into Poverty,School Leavers: Choice and Opportunity, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster-Jones, F. (1967). A social ranking of Melbourne suburbs.Austral. New Zeal. J. Sociol. 3: 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, S., Rapien, E. B., Seibert, F. M., and Sklansky, M. A. (1962).The Dropouts, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Standford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Saleem, B. L. and Bryce, H. (1964).School Dropouts: A commentary and Annotated Bibliography, Syracuse University Youth Development Center, Syracuse, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1959).15–18: A Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education, Vols. I and II (The Crowther Report), H. M. Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Z. (1969). Failing in New Haven: An analysis of high school graduates and dropouts.Soc. Forces 48: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Association, Research Division (1967).School Dropouts: Research Summary National Education Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozolins, U. (1974). Out of school. Master's thesis, University of Melbourne.

  • Poole, M. E. (1978). Identifying early school leaving.Austral. J. Educ. 22: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. E., and Simkin, K. (1976). Education and the 15 to 18 age group.Educ. News 15(6): 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, W. C., and Wilkes, R. E. (1975).School Leavers in Australia, 1971–1972, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr., and Rhodes, A. L. (1959).A Socio-Psychological Study of Conforming and Deviating Behavior Among Adolescents, Report of Project 507, State University of Iowa, Iowa City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, J., and Scandrette, O. (1971). Relationship between teacher personality ratings and student academic success.J. Educ. Res. 65: 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosier, M. J. (1978).Early School Leavers in Australia, IEA Monograph Series, No. 7, Almgvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, H. H. (1969). Another look at the dropout problem.J. Educ. Res. 62: 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, D. F. (1964). Who passes the Eleven Plus?New Soc. 5(3): 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesseneer, C. M., and Tesseneer, R. A. (1958). Review of the literature on school Dropouts.Bull. Natl. Assoc. Secondary School Principals 62: 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornburg, H. D. (1975). Attitudinal determinants in holding dropouts in school.J. Educ. Res. 68: 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinney, M., Benn, C., and O'Neill, J. (1974).The Luck of the Game: A Study of School Leavers in Melbourne Inner Suburban Schools. Brotherhood of St. Lawrence, Fitzry, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. S. (1972). Comparisons of selected familial, personality, and vocational variables of high school students and dropouts.J. Educ. Res. 65: 462–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, D. R. (1964). Scholastic abiltiy of school dropouts.School Life 40: 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. V. (1963). School dropouts.NEA J. 52(2): 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received Ph.D. from La Trobe University. Current research interest is adolescent development.

Received Ph.D. from University of N.S. W. Current research interest is mathematical reasoning in adolescence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poole, M.E., Low, B.C. Who stays? who leaves? an examination of sex differences in staying and leaving. J Youth Adolescence 11, 49–63 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537816

Keywords

Navigation