Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biodiversity, cultural diversity, and food equity

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiversity and genetic resources have become the focal point of major national and international biological and political debates regarding control, ownership, access, and erosion of critical resources. While these issues are key to environmental sustainability and food security, biodiversity and genetic resources must be seen in the broader context of their inextricable relationship to cultural diversity and to humans' view of nature. Nature is assumed to be constituted socially through a wide variety of human processes described collectively as culture. Three significant cultural factors, technology, science, and capitalism, are largely responsible for the secularization and homogenization of food and agriculture and the remaking of nature. These processes and forces may simultaneously and unwittingly create the problems of declines in biodiversity, cultural diversity, and food equity. Indeed, it may well be that the only way to conserve cultural biodiversity in the field is to conserve cultural diversity among peoples. This reunification of biodiversity and cultural diversity and food and agriculture will require new paradigms and institutional mechanisms that allow us to show our care for each other through our reverence for nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcorn, J. B. 1991. “Ethics, economics, and conservation.” Pp. 317–349 in M. L. Oldfield and J. B. Alcorn (eds.),Biodiversity: Culture, Conservation, and Ecodevelopment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, L. H. 1979.Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., W. B. Lacy, J. Burkhardt, and L. R. Lacy. 1991.Plants, Power and Profit: Social, Economic, and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies. London, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., W. B. Lacy, and J. Burkhardt. 1989. “Culture and care: Ethical and policy dimensions of germplasm conservation.” Pp. 43–62 in L. Knutson and A. K. Stoner (eds.),Biotic Diversity and Germplasm Preservation, Global Imperatives. Netherlands: Kluver Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. 1992. “New dimensions of crop plant genetic resources policy: Social and ethical issues.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Chicago, IL.

  • Dahlberg, K. 1993. “Food policy councils: The experience of five cities and one country.” Unpublished discussion paper.

  • Durkheim, E. 1975.Durkheim on Religion. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenreck, S. 1992. “A sense of place: The nature and significance of community.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Institute for Alternative Agriculture. Washington, DC.

  • Estava, G. 1993. “Reembedding food in agriculture.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. University Park, PA. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Gallager, J. D. 1993. “The United States signs the biodiversity convention.”Diversity 9 (1–2): 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idhe, D. 1989.Technology and the Life World: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. P. 1993.The Earth Summit: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). London, England: Graham and Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. R. and D. L. Kleinman. 1988. “Seeds of controversy: National property versus common heritage.” Pp. 173–203 in J. R. Kloppenburg, Jr.,Seeds and Sovereignty: The Use and Control of Plant Genetic Resources (ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1987.Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Kaynes, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives. 1991.The U. S. National Plant Germplasm System. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives. 1993.Livestock. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives. 1991.Forest Trees. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives. 1993.Agricultural Crop Issues and Policies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicols, A. 1993. “Interior Secretary Babbitt takes lead on national biological survey.”Diversity 9 (1, 2): 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C. 1992. “Reconsidering diversity in agriculture and food systems: An ecofeminist approach.”Agriculture and Human Values IX (3): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, D. G. 1993. “Spirit of cooperation overshadows disharmonies as FAO marks tenth anniversary.”Diversity 9 (1, 2): 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, G. 1984. “Germplasm conservation toward the year 2000.” Pp. 131–164 in C. W. Yeatman, D. Kafton, and G. Wilkes (eds.),Plant Genetic Resources: A Conservation Imperative. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt. S. C. 1985.Biotechnology and Genetic Diversity. San Francisco, CA: Agricultural Land Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. 1992. “A matter of good breeding.”New Scientist (18 January): 8.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Notes 1. This paper is based, in part, on the Presidential Address of the 1993 annual meeting of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society and on work to appear in a forthcoming bookBiodiversity/Cultural Diversity: The Plant Germplasm Controversy in Cultural Context by L. Busch, W. Lacy, J. Burkhardt, D. Hemken, J. Moraga, J. de Souza Silva, and T. Koponen. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. The research has been supported, in part, by grants from the National Science Foundations' Ethics and Values Studies Program and the USDA Cooperative State Research Service.

William B. Lacy is Assistant Dean for Research and Professor of Rural Sociology at Penn State University. He was President of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society during 1992/1993. His research focuses on science policy, agricultural research, biotechnology, and sustainable agriculture. He recently coauthored a book entitledPlants, Power and Profit: Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences of the New Biotechnologies and is currently coauthoring a forthcoming book entitledBiodiversity/Cultural Diversity: The Plant Germplasm Controversy in Cultural Context.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacy, W.B. Biodiversity, cultural diversity, and food equity. Agric Hum Values 11, 3–9 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534442

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01534442

Keywords

Navigation