Skip to main content
Log in

A contribution to a cytogenetical survey of the Malvaceae

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Chromosome numbers of 32 species from 13 genera representing three of the four tribes of the Malvaceae are reported. They are summarized in Table 1 (p. 433).

  2. 2.

    It is possible to identify certain of the chromosomes of the diploid species ofAbutilon by characteristic features of their morphology.

  3. 3.

    Attachment of chromosomes to the nucleolus in the prophase of mitosis or meiosis has been observed in several genera, especiallyAbutilon andSidalcea.

  4. 4.

    Secondary association probably occurs in most polyploid species examined, but is not pronounced.

  5. 5.

    Tetraploid strains occur in severalHibiscus species.

  6. 6.

    Of three races ofAnoda cristata L., two had the haploid number 15, while the third had n=18. The problem of the origin of such variant strains is discussed.

  7. 7.

    It is concluded that 7 is the basic number in theMalveae andUreneae, and probably also in theMalopeae. The basic number in theHibisceae is as yet uncertain, though the evidence is not incompatible with b=7 as in the Malveae and Ureneae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, Z. (1936). “Cytological studies of some Indian oleiferous Cruciferae. III”. Ann. Botany 50: 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arutjunova, L. G. (1936). “An investigation of chromosome morphology in the genusGossypium”. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. USSR. 3 (12): 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, J. (1929). “The chromosome numbers of Indian cottons”. Ann. Botany 43: 604–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, K. B. (1933). “On the relation between geographic races and polyploidy inSilene ciliata Pourr”. Genetica 15: 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslavetz, L., Medwedewa, G., andM. Magitt. (1934). “Zytologische Untersuchungen der Bastpflanzen”. Z. Zücht. 19: 239–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, G. W. (1932). “Chromosome numbers inAlthaea rosea”. Science 75: 488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G., (1934). “The chromosomal relationships in the swede and turnip groups ofBrassica”. Ann. Botany 48: 601–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, J. H. (1933). “Cytological studies in the Malvaceae and certain related families”. J. Genetics 28: 33–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, J. H., (1935). “Chromosome studies in the Malvaceae and certain related families. II. Genetica 17: 487–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, J. H. (1924a). “The cytology of the cotton plant. I. Microspore formation in Sea Island cotton”. Ann. Botany 38: 407–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, H. J., (1924b). “The cytology of the cotton plant. II. Chromosome numbers of Old and New World cottons”. Ann. Botany 38: 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. (1935). “Symbols for chromosome numbers”. Nature 85: 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesseler, E. von (1932). “Observations on chromosome number inAlthaea rosea, Callirhoe involucrata, andHibiscus coccineus”. Am. J. Bot. 19: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenke, P. (1929). Cited fromG. Tischler. (1931). Tabulae Biologicae Periodicae, 7: 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, E. (1930). Cited fromG. Tischler. (1931). Tabulae Biologicae Periodicae 7: 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Cour, L. (1931). “Improvements in everyday technique in plant cytology”. J. Roy. Micros. Soc. 51: 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latter, J. (1932). “The meiotic divisions in pollen mother cells ofMalva sylvestris”. Ann. Botany 46: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. J. C. (1931). “The secondary association of chromosomes”. Cytologia 2: 351–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, A. E. (1933). “Chromosomes inGossypium and related genera”. J. Agric. Res. 46: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margadant (1926). Cited fromG. Tischler. (1927). Tabulae Biologicae Periodicae 4: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntzing, A. (1935). “Chromosome behaviour in some Nicotiana hybrids”. Hereditas 20: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, G. (1936). “Chromosome numbers in some crops and wild angiosperms”. Jap. J. Genetics 12: 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navashin, M. (1932). “The dislocation hypothesis of evolution of chromosome numbers”. Z.I.A.V. 53: 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F. (1928). “Types of supernumerary chromosomes in Maize”. Anat. Record 41: 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsted, A. (1934). “Cytological studies in cotton. II. Two interspecific hybrids between Asiatic and New World cottons”. J. Genetics 28: 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsted, A. (1935). “Chromosome numbers in the Malvaceae. I”. J. Genetics 31: 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsted, A. (1937). “Cytological studies in Cotton. IV. Chromosome conjugation in interspecific hybrids”. Journ. of Genetics 34: 97–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenssen-Stenar, A. H. (1925). “Embryologische Studien. I. Zur Embryologie einer Columniferen.” Akad. Aflr. Uppsala, pp. 1–75.

  • Teshima, T. (1933). “Genetical and cytological studies on an interspecific hybrid ofHibiscus esculentus L. andH. Manihot L.” J. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Univ. 34: 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, J. M. (1934). “Chromosome number and meiotic behaviour inGossypium”. J. Agr. Res. 49: 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, J. M. (1936). “Chromosomes inSphaeralcea and related genera”. Cytologia 7: 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ford, C.E. A contribution to a cytogenetical survey of the Malvaceae. Genetica 20, 431–452 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531777

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531777

Keywords

Navigation