Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agents, vendors, and farmers: Public and private sector extension in agricultural development

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the assumption that agricultural technologies were available and that the problem was their dissemination and adoption, U.S. development efforts have focused on establishing public-sector extension systems for farmers in developing countries. Evaluations of government extension services in developing countries, however, have found them to be largely ineffective, especially in helping small farmers. As a result, private-sector extension is increasingly receiving attention as an alternative approach. This paper examines various characteristics of public- and privatesector extension, drawing on both the literature and a case study of government extension and farm input stores in Imbabura province, Ecuador. It concludes with a discussion of the implications of increased privatization of extension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for International Development. (1982). “Private Enterprise Development,” Washington, DC: AID Policy Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agency for International Development. (1987).Reorientation of the Agricultural Sector. Quito: A Joint Ecuadorean/N.C. State University Report.

  • Burbach, R. and P. Flynn. (1980).Agribusiness in the Americas. NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1974).Managing Rural Development. Uppsala, Sweden: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, W. and M. McNulty. (1985). “Endogenous Local Public Extension Policy,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 67, No. 4.

  • Hulme, D. (1983). “Agricultural Extension: Public Service or Private Business?”Agricultural Administration, 14, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J. (1977).Motivation and Performance of Extension Field Staff. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, G. and D. Wilcock. (1985).Final Report: The Experiences of U.S. Universities in Building Colleges of Agriculture in Africa. Washington, DC: USAID-BIFAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. P. (1985). “Extension: Do We Really Have Anything Useful or New to Offer the Developing Countries?” In M. Andrews (ed),The International Role of Extension: Future Direction, Conference Highlights and Recommendations. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moris, J. (1983).Reforming Agricultural Extension Services in Africa. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orivel, F. (1983).The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D. (1978).Farmers and Towns: Rural-Urban Relations in Highland Bolivia. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E. B. (1971).Extension in the Andes. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W. (1987). “The Private Sector: Its Extension Systems and Public/Private Coordination,” in W. Rivera and S. Schram (eds),Agricultural Extension Worldwide. NY: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1969).Modernization Among Peasants—The Impact of Communication. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. (1982).Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana, R. (1983).Campesinado Indigena y el Desafio de la Modernidad. Quito: CAAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavis, B. (1979).Agricultural Extension for Small Farmers. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, B. (1983).Altering the Present Paradigm: A Different Path to Sustainable Development in the Rural Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1981).Participatory Approaches to Agricultural Research and Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, E. T. (1985). “International Technology Development and Transfer,” in M. Andrews (ed),The International Role of Extension: Future Directions, Conference Highlights and Recommendations. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. L. Van Crowder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

L. Van Crowder is an assistant professor in the Editorial Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS), University of Florida. His international experience includes working as an extension/rural communication specialist in Bolivia, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Ecuador. Most recently (1986), he completed a regional analysis of public and private sector agricultural knowledge systems in Ecuador.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Crowder, L. Agents, vendors, and farmers: Public and private sector extension in agricultural development. Agric Hum Values 4, 26–31 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530499

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530499

Keywords

Search

Navigation