Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic heterogeneity among the founders of laboratory populations ofDrosophila. I. Scutlllar chaetae

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of flies with mor than four scutellar chaetae (additional chaetae) has been followed for 45 generations in three strains set up from single inseminated females ofDrosophila melanogaster collected in the wild from the same locality at the same time. Each strain differed in the incidence of additional chaetae over this time, and the differences between strains were found to be controlled largely by additive genes.

Fifteen further such strains were followed for 9 generations and each maintained consistent incidences of additional chaetae.

Thus there may be genetic differences between populations derived from single inseminated females present in a given wild population, so lending support to a role for genetic drift (as a founder effect) in these situations. These differences may be maintained for many generations.

Some possibilities for obtaining rapid responses in directional selection experiments based on the initial selection of favourable strains derived from single individuals are discussed briefly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bodmer, W. F. &P. A. Parsons (1962). Linkage and recombination in evolution.Advances in Genetics 11: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. S. (1963). Variation of scutellar bristles inDrosophila. I. Genetic leakage.Genetics 48: 497–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. S., W. Scowcroft, R. Nassar, H. Angeles, &G. Bravo (1965). Variation of scutellar bristles inDrosophila. IV. Effects of selection.Aust. J. Biol. Sci 18: 619–641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, J. B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems.Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 463–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I. M., &E. R. Dempster (1962). Indeterminism in interspecific competition.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S. 48: 821–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBean, I. T. &P. A. Parsons (1966). The genotypic control of the duration of copulation inDrosophila melanogaster.Experientia 22: 101–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1941). Variation and selection of polygenic characters.J. Genet. 41: 159–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. &B. J. Harrison (1949). The manifold effect of selection.Heredity 3: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1954). Changes of gentic environment and evolution. In. Evolution as a process. Eds.Huxley, J., A. C. Hardy andE. B. Ford, pp. 157–180.

  • Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., L. Erway &A. Fraser (1966). Switch genes and polygenic systems determining number of scutellar bristles.Genetics 54: 348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T. (1954). Experimental studies of interspecies competition. II. Temperature, humidity, and competition in two species ofTribolium.Physiol. Zool. 27: 177–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T. &M. Lloyd (1955). Natural selection and the outcome of competition.Amer. Nat. 89: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1964). A diallel cross for mating speeds inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetica 35: 141–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. &D. Kaul (1966). Mating speed and duration of copulation inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Heredity 21: 219–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. &D. Kaul (1967). Variability within and between strains for mating behaviour parameters inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Experientia 23: 131–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B., B. Langer &L. D. Spiess (1966). Heterogamic mating control by gene arrangements inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Genetics 54: 1139–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M. &T. B. Boam (1959). Effects of disruptive selection. II. Polymorphism and divergence without isolation.Heredity 13: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M. &J. B. Gibson (1962). Isolation by disruptive selection.Nature 193: 1164–1166.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parsons, P.A., Hosgood, S.M.W. Genetic heterogeneity among the founders of laboratory populations ofDrosophila. I. Scutlllar chaetae. Genetica 38, 328–339 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507465

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507465

Keywords

Navigation