Abstract
This study assessed the impact of some complex question forms frequently used by attorneys who examine and cross-examine witnesses in the courtroom. Fifteen males and 15 females from each of four student populations (kindergarten, fourth grade, ninth grade, and college) viewed a videotaped incident and then responded to questions about the incident. Half the questions were asked in “law-yerese” (i.e., using complex question forms); the remaining half asked for the same information using simply phrased question forms of the same length. Lawyerese confused children, adolescents, and young adults alike. Questions that included multiple parts with mutually exclusive responses were the most difficult to answer; those that included negatives, double negatives or difficult vocabulary also posed significant problems. Results suggest that complex question forms impede truth-seeking and should be prohibited in court.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd, C. J. (1993).Questioning techniques of Child Protective Service workers. Unpublished master's thesis, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. E. (1988).Strange language: Child victims under cross examination (3rd ed.). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Charles Sturt University—Riverina.
California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970).
Cashmore, J., & Bussey, K. (1990). Children's conceptions of the witness role. In J. Spencer, G. Nicholson, R. Flin, & R. Bull (Eds.),Children's evidence in legal proceedings: An international perspective (pp. 177–188). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instruction.The Columbia Law Review, 79, 1307–1374.
Cosgrove, J. M., & Patterson, C. J. (1977). Plans and the development of listener skills.Developmental Psychology, 13, 557–564.
Cultice, J. C., Somerville, S. C., & Wellman, H. M. (1983). Preschoolers' memory monitoring: Feeling-of-knowing judgments.Child Development, 54, 1480–1486.
Denet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process.Law & Society Review, 14, 445–564.
Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses. In A. Trankell (Ed.),Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279–297). Stockholm: Norstedt.
Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.
deVilliers, P., & deVilliers, J. (1979).The developing child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Dickson, W. P. (1981).Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.),Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H., Speer, J. R., Green, F. L., & August, D. L. (1981). The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 46 (5, Serial No. 192).
Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory.British Journal of Psychology, 83, 323–336.
Flin, R., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children's knowledge of court proceedings.British Journal of Psychology, 80, 285–297.
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135.
Gaer, E. P. (1969). Children's understanding and production of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 289–294.
Gleason, J. B. (1989).The development of language. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Gleason, J. B. (1993). Language development: An overview and a preview (pp. 1–37) In J. B. Gleason (Ed.)The development of language (3rd ed.), New York: Macmillan.
Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones. D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (5, Serial No. 229).
Hafemeister, T. L. (1994. March).Efforts to minimize trauma to child witnesses: A judicial appraisal of the best means to bring related information to their attention. In M. J. Saks (Chair),Disseminating information to the judiciary. Presented to the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Santa Fe, NM.
Hopmann, M. R., & Maratsos, M. P. A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex syntax.Journal of Child Language, 5, 295–309.
Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation.Child Development, 48, 986–992.
Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.Child Development, 50, 643–655.
Matthews, E., & Saywitz, K. (1992). Child victim witness manual.CJER Journal, 12, 1–69.
McGough, L. (1993, March) Policy implications. In N. W. Perry (Chair).The child witness: Does legal policy reflect empirical evidence? Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
Melton, G., Limber, S., Jacobs, J., & Oberlander, L. (1992).Preparing sexually abused children for testimony: Children's perceptions of the legal process [Final report to the National Center on Child Abuse & Neglect, Grant No. 90-CA-1274]. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
O'Barr, W. M. (1982).Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Patterson, C. J., Massad, C. M., & Cosgrove, J. M. (1978). Children's referential communication: Components of plans for effective listening.Developmental Psychology, 14, 401–406.
Pierre-Puysegur, M. (1985, July).The representations of the penal system among children from six to ten years. Presented at the 8th biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Tours, France.
Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults.Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986.
Reich, P. (1986).Language development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Saywitz, K. J. (1989). Children's conceptions of the legal system: Court is a place to play basketball. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 131–157) New York: Springer-Verlag.
Saywitz, K. J. (1995). Improving children's testimony: The question, the answer, and the environment. In: M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, and Y. S. Ben-Parath (Eds(,Memory and testimony in the child witness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saywitz, K. J. (1994). Children in court: Principles of child development for judicial application. In J. Bulkley and C. Sandt (Eds.),A judicial primer on child sexual abuse. Washington DC: American Bar Association.
Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (In press). Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practical implications. In L. Berliner, J. Briere, & J. Bulkley (Eds.),APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Saywitz, K., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. (1990). Children's knowledge of legal terminology.Law and Human Behavior, 14, 523–535.
Saywitz, K. J., Nathanson, R., & Snyder, L. (1993). Credibility of child witnesses: The role of communicative competence. In L. S Snyder & K. J. Saywitz (Eds.),Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 59–78.
Saywitz, K. J., Nathanson, R., Snyder, L., & Lamphear, V. (1993).Preparing children for the investigative and judicial process: Improving communication, memory and emotional resiliency (Report No. 90CA1179). Washington DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1991, April).Preparing child witnesses: The efficacy of comprehension monitoring training. Paper presented at the biennial convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children's testimony with preparation. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.),Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 117–146). New York: Guilford Publications.
Singer, J., & Flavell, J. (1981). Development of knowledge about communication: Children's evaluations of explicity ambiguous messages.child Development, 52, 1211–1215.
Stafford, C. E. (1962). The child as a witness.Washington Law Review, 37, 303–324.
Stevens, D., & Berlinger, L. (1980). Special techniques for child witnesses. In L. G. Shulz (Ed.),The sexual victimology of youth (pp. 246–256). Springfield, IL: Thomas.Neglect. 17, 25–37.
Walker, A. G. (1987). Linguistic manipulation, power and the legal system In L. Kedar (Ed.),Power through discourse (pp. 57–80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Walker, A. G. (1993). Questioning young children in court: A linguistic case study.Law and Human Behavior, 17, 59–81.
Walker, A. G. (1994).Handbook on questioning children: A linguistic perspective. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.
Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C., Hinton, I., & Ozbek, I. (1989). What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? First steps down a less traveled path in child witness research. In S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 158–183). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wellman, H. M. (1977). The early development of intentional memory behavior.Human Development, 20, 86–101.
White, S. (1990). The investigatory interview with suspected victims of child sexual abuse. In A. M. La Greca (Ed.),Through the eyes of the child: Obtaining self-reports from children and adolescents (pp. 368–394). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, N.W., McAuliff, B.D., Tam, P. et al. When lawyers question children. Law Hum Behav 19, 609–629 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377