Skip to main content
Log in

When lawyers question children

Is justice served?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of some complex question forms frequently used by attorneys who examine and cross-examine witnesses in the courtroom. Fifteen males and 15 females from each of four student populations (kindergarten, fourth grade, ninth grade, and college) viewed a videotaped incident and then responded to questions about the incident. Half the questions were asked in “law-yerese” (i.e., using complex question forms); the remaining half asked for the same information using simply phrased question forms of the same length. Lawyerese confused children, adolescents, and young adults alike. Questions that included multiple parts with mutually exclusive responses were the most difficult to answer; those that included negatives, double negatives or difficult vocabulary also posed significant problems. Results suggest that complex question forms impede truth-seeking and should be prohibited in court.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd, C. J. (1993).Questioning techniques of Child Protective Service workers. Unpublished master's thesis, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

  • Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. E. (1988).Strange language: Child victims under cross examination (3rd ed.). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Charles Sturt University—Riverina.

    Google Scholar 

  • California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970).

  • Cashmore, J., & Bussey, K. (1990). Children's conceptions of the witness role. In J. Spencer, G. Nicholson, R. Flin, & R. Bull (Eds.),Children's evidence in legal proceedings: An international perspective (pp. 177–188). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instruction.The Columbia Law Review, 79, 1307–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, J. M., & Patterson, C. J. (1977). Plans and the development of listener skills.Developmental Psychology, 13, 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cultice, J. C., Somerville, S. C., & Wellman, H. M. (1983). Preschoolers' memory monitoring: Feeling-of-knowing judgments.Child Development, 54, 1480–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denet, B. (1980). Language in the legal process.Law & Society Review, 14, 445–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses. In A. Trankell (Ed.),Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279–297). Stockholm: Norstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • deVilliers, P., & deVilliers, J. (1979).The developing child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, W. P. (1981).Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.),Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35–60). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Speer, J. R., Green, F. L., & August, D. L. (1981). The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 46 (5, Serial No. 192).

  • Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory.British Journal of Psychology, 83, 323–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children's knowledge of court proceedings.British Journal of Psychology, 80, 285–297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaer, E. P. (1969). Children's understanding and production of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. B. (1989).The development of language. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, J. B. (1993). Language development: An overview and a preview (pp. 1–37) In J. B. Gleason (Ed.)The development of language (3rd ed.), New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones. D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (5, Serial No. 229).

  • Hafemeister, T. L. (1994. March).Efforts to minimize trauma to child witnesses: A judicial appraisal of the best means to bring related information to their attention. In M. J. Saks (Chair),Disseminating information to the judiciary. Presented to the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Santa Fe, NM.

  • Hopmann, M. R., & Maratsos, M. P. A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex syntax.Journal of Child Language, 5, 295–309.

  • Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation.Child Development, 48, 986–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.Child Development, 50, 643–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E., & Saywitz, K. (1992). Child victim witness manual.CJER Journal, 12, 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, L. (1993, March) Policy implications. In N. W. Perry (Chair).The child witness: Does legal policy reflect empirical evidence? Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.

  • Melton, G., Limber, S., Jacobs, J., & Oberlander, L. (1992).Preparing sexually abused children for testimony: Children's perceptions of the legal process [Final report to the National Center on Child Abuse & Neglect, Grant No. 90-CA-1274]. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Barr, W. M. (1982).Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J., Massad, C. M., & Cosgrove, J. M. (1978). Children's referential communication: Components of plans for effective listening.Developmental Psychology, 14, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre-Puysegur, M. (1985, July).The representations of the penal system among children from six to ten years. Presented at the 8th biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Tours, France.

  • Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults.Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, P. (1986).Language development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J. (1989). Children's conceptions of the legal system: Court is a place to play basketball. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 131–157) New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J. (1995). Improving children's testimony: The question, the answer, and the environment. In: M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, and Y. S. Ben-Parath (Eds(,Memory and testimony in the child witness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J. (1994). Children in court: Principles of child development for judicial application. In J. Bulkley and C. Sandt (Eds.),A judicial primer on child sexual abuse. Washington DC: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (In press). Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practical implications. In L. Berliner, J. Briere, & J. Bulkley (Eds.),APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Saywitz, K., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. (1990). Children's knowledge of legal terminology.Law and Human Behavior, 14, 523–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., Nathanson, R., & Snyder, L. (1993). Credibility of child witnesses: The role of communicative competence. In L. S Snyder & K. J. Saywitz (Eds.),Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 59–78.

  • Saywitz, K. J., Nathanson, R., Snyder, L., & Lamphear, V. (1993).Preparing children for the investigative and judicial process: Improving communication, memory and emotional resiliency (Report No. 90CA1179). Washington DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1991, April).Preparing child witnesses: The efficacy of comprehension monitoring training. Paper presented at the biennial convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children's testimony with preparation. In G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.),Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 117–146). New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., & Flavell, J. (1981). Development of knowledge about communication: Children's evaluations of explicity ambiguous messages.child Development, 52, 1211–1215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, C. E. (1962). The child as a witness.Washington Law Review, 37, 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D., & Berlinger, L. (1980). Special techniques for child witnesses. In L. G. Shulz (Ed.),The sexual victimology of youth (pp. 246–256). Springfield, IL: Thomas.Neglect. 17, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1987). Linguistic manipulation, power and the legal system In L. Kedar (Ed.),Power through discourse (pp. 57–80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1993). Questioning young children in court: A linguistic case study.Law and Human Behavior, 17, 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. G. (1994).Handbook on questioning children: A linguistic perspective. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C., Hinton, I., & Ozbek, I. (1989). What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? First steps down a less traveled path in child witness research. In S. Ceci, D. Ross, M. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 158–183). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (1977). The early development of intentional memory behavior.Human Development, 20, 86–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1990). The investigatory interview with suspected victims of child sexual abuse. In A. M. La Greca (Ed.),Through the eyes of the child: Obtaining self-reports from children and adolescents (pp. 368–394). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Perry, N.W., McAuliff, B.D., Tam, P. et al. When lawyers question children. Law Hum Behav 19, 609–629 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499377

Keywords

Navigation