Skip to main content
Log in

The helping process in group therapy: A review and discussion

  • Published:
Group

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The essential activity of group therapy consists of members taking an interest in each other by asking questions, showing concern, and conveying understanding. When members have not done this it has often been taken as a sign of “resistance.” A review of the research on helping suggests that there are four social factors that affect assistance giving in groups: 1) ambiguity-often people fail to give help because they are uncertain about who should give it, what should be done, and how it should be done; 2) often help is not given because of the way in which problems are presented; 3) the social comparisons that individuals make affect help-giving; and 4) there are costs associated with providing assistance. This discussion suggests that leaders can facilitate interaction among group members as teachers who clarify and as indirect helpers who redirect concerns back to group members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973).Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R., Ickes, W., & Kidd, R. (1979). Effects of the perceived intentionality and stability of another's dependency on helping behavior.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74(3), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971).Class, codes and control. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978).Interpersonal attraction. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Harris, T. l(1978).Social origins of depression. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., & Ward, L. (1972). Why don't bystanders help? Because of ambiguity?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 29, 392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., & Ward, L. (1974). Where is the apathetic bystander? Situation characteristics of the emergency.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 29, 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, N. (1983). The development of self-esteem and self-esteem regulation. In J. Mack & S. Ablon, (Eds.),The development and sustaining of self-esteem in childhood, (pp. 122–150). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crader, K., & Wentworth, W. (1985). A structural reinterpretation of responsibility, risk and helping in small collectives of children.American Sociological Review, 50, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dies, R., & Cohen, L. (1976). Content considerations in group therapist self-disclosure.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 26, 71–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920).A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Boni & Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froberg, W., & Slife, B. (1987). Overcoming obstacles to the implementation of Yalom's model of inpatient group psychotherapy.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 371–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity.American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, H., & Solomon, L. (1980). Toward a peer theory of group psychotherapy.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30, 23–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunebaum, H., & Solomon, L. (1987). Peer relationships, self-esteem and the self.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 37, 475–513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmacher, J. (1973). The concept of character, character problems, and group therapy.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 14, 513–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure.American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1984).The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, L. (1977). A group centered approach to group psychotherapy.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27, 423–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (1963). Social class and the exercise of parental authority. In N. Smelser & W. Smelser (Eds.),Personality and social systems. (pp. 297–313). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, M. (1985).The helping group. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. (1970).The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M., Yalon, I., & Miles, N. (1973).Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. (1983). Self-esteem and its development: An overview. In: J. Mack & S. Albon, (Eds.),The development and sustaining of self-esteem in childhood. (pp. 1–32). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., & Kenny, D. (1986). Reciprocity of self-disclosure at the individual and dyadic levels.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormont, L. (1988). The leaders role in resolving resistance to intimacy in the group setting.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 38, 29–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L., Russell, D., & Heim, M. (1979). The experience of loneliness. In I. Frieze, D. Bar-tel, & J. Carroll (Eds.),New approaches to social problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, J., & Piliavin, I. (1972). Effect of blood on reaction to a victim.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., Piliavin, J., & Rodin, J. (1969). Good samaratanism: An underground phenomenon.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 13, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, I., Piliavin, J., & Rodin, J. (1975). Costs, diffusion and the stigmatized victim.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1961).On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. (1964).Thirty-eight witnesses. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953).Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavson, S. (1964).A textbook of analytic group psychotherapy. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Vanderbilt, K., & Callen, M. (1973). Social comparison and bystander intervention in emergencies.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(2), 186–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax, C., & Carkhuff, R. (1969).Towards effective counseling and psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1980a). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help giving.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1980b). May I borrow your classroom notes? An attributional analysis of judgments of help giving in an achievement related context.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 676–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1980). On the developmental line of selfobject relations. In A. Goldberg (Ed.),Advances in self psychology (pp. 117–130). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. (1985).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I., & Rand, K. (1966). Compatibility and cohesiveness in therapy groups.Archives of General Psychiatry, 15, 267–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. (1984). On the primacy of emotion.American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferencik, B.M. The helping process in group therapy: A review and discussion. Group 16, 113–124 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01459711

Keywords

Navigation