Abstract
Starch gel electrophoretic analysis of crude seed (cotyledonary) extracts of Phaseolus vulgaris, P. coccineus,F 1 ,F 2 ,F 3 ,and reciprocal F 1 backcrosses reveals monomorphic and polymorphic forms of leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) in the genus. The polymorphic forms (LAP-II) are controlled by the codominant alleles, Lap-IIa and Lap-IIb.Reciprocal backcrosses to both species show a highly significant deviation from the expected 1:1 ratio when the donor parent allele is transmitted through male gametes. There is not a significant deviation from the expected ratio when transmission is through female gametes. Differential gametic selection, in conjunction with differential sterility, suggests that structural differences exist between the genomes of these species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashton, G. C., and Braden, A. W. H. (1961). Serum beta-globulin polymorphism in mice.Australian J. Biol. Sci. 14 248.
Baker, C. M. A., Manwell, C., Labisky, R. F., and Harper, J. A. (1966). Molecular genetics of avian proteins.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 17 467.
Beckman, L., Scandalios, J. G., and Brewbaker, J. L. (1964). Genetics of leucine aminopeptidase isozymes in maize.Genetics 50 899.
Beckman, L., and Nilson, L. R. (1965). Variations of serum enzymes in bird species and hybrids.Hereditas 53 221.
Bemis, W. P., and Kedar, N. (1961). Inheritance of morphological abnormalities in seedlings of two species ofPhaseolus.J. Heredity 52 171.
Bhatia, C. R., Buiatti, M., and Smith, H. H. (1967). Electrophoretic variation in proteins and enzymes of the tumor-forming hybridNicotiana glauca × N. langsdorffii and its parent species.Am. J. Botany 54 1237.
Duke, E. J., and Glassman, E. (1968). Evolution of xanthine dehydrogenase inDrosophila.Genetics 58 101.
Hedrick, U. P., Tapley, W. T., Van Eseltine, G. P., and Enzie, W. D. (1931). Beans of New York.In Vegetables of New York, J. B. Lyon Co., Albany, N.Y., pp. 1–110.
Hubby, J. L., and Narise, S. (1967). Protein differences inDrosophila. III. Allelic differences and species differences inin vitro hybrid enzyme formation.Genetics 57 291.
Johnson, F. M., Kanapi, C. G., Richardson, R. H., and Sakai, R. K. (1967). Isozyme variability in species of the genusDrosophila. I. A multiple allelic isozyme system inDrosophila busckii: Inheritance and general considerations.Biochem. Genet. 1 35.
Koehn, R. K., and Rasmussen, D. I. (1967). Polymorphic and monomorphic serum esterase heterogeneity in catostomid fish populations.Biochem. Genet. 1 131.
Lamprecht, H. (1941). Die Artgrenze zwischenPhaseolus vulgaris L. and P.multiflorus Lam.Hereditas 27 51.
Manwell, C., Baker, C. M. A., Ashton, P. A., and Corner, E. D. S. (1967). Biochemical differences betweenCalanus finmarchicus andC. helgolandicus.J. Marine Biol. Assoc. U.K. 47 145.
Poulik, M. D. (1957). Starch gel electrophoresis in a discontinuous system of buffers.Nature 180 1477.
Shaw, C. R. (1965). Electrophoretic variation in enzymes.Science 149 936.
Stephens, S. G. (1949). The cytogenetics of speciation inGossypium. I. Selective elimination of the donor parent genotype in interspecific backcrosses.Genetics 34 627.
Stephens, S. G. (1950). The internal mechanism of speciation inGossypium.Botan. Rev. 16 115.
Ter-Avanesjan, D. V. (1949). The role of the number of pollen grains per flower in fertilization in plants.Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. Plant Breeding (Leningrad)28 119. (Cited fromPlant Breed. Abstr. 25: abstr. no. 2722, 1955.)
West, N. B., and Garber, E. B. (1967). Genetic studies of variant enzymes. II. The inheritance of esterases and leucine aminopeptidase inPhaseolus vulgaris × P. coccineus.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9 646.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grants GM 11612 and GM 14941-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wall, J.R. Leucine aminopeptidase polymorphism inPhaseolus and differential elimination of the donor parent genotype in interspecific backcrosses. Biochem Genet 2, 109–118 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458710
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01458710