Skip to main content
Log in

Similarity grouping of Australian universities

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Unified National System of Australian Universities was created out of universities, institutes of technology and colleges of advanced education. In this study similarity clustering of universities within this system is attempted based on two data sets: one based on evaluative ratings and the other on quantitative performance indicators. With the exception of three traditional universities that tended to cluster together across data sets no consistent clustering emerged. Within data sets there was no tendency for the emergent clusters to reflect the origins of the institutions in any consistent manner. It is suggested that the Unified National System has not reduced diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bereiter, C. (1980). ‘Development in writing’, in Gregg, L. and Steinberg, E. (eds.),Cognitive processes in writing, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987).The psychology of written communication. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (1992). ‘The phenomenology of writing by hand’,Intelligent Tutoring Media 3, 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beaugrance, R. (1984).Text production. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1973).Writing without teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1981).Writing with power, techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B (1980).Cluster analysis (2nd edition). London: SSRC/Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigley, L, and Witte, S. (1981). ‘Analyzing revision’,College Composition and Communication 32, 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L.S., and Hayes, J.R. (1981a). ‘A cognitive process theory of writing’,College Composition and Communication 32, 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L.S., and Hayes, J.R. (1981b). ‘Plans that guide the composing process’, in Frederiksen, C., and Dominic, J. (eds.),Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication. Volume 2. Writing: Process, Development and Communication. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S.M., Britton, B.K., Muth, K.D., and Dogan, N. (1982). ‘Writing and revising persuative documents: Cognitive demands’,Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., and Knapper, C.K. (1984). ‘Academics and their writing’,Studies in Higher Education 9, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., and Branthwaite, A. (1989). ‘The psychologist as wordsmith, A questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British Psychologists’,Higher Education 18, 423–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. (1968).Frames of mind; ability, perception and self perception in the arts and sciences. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R.T. (1986). ‘Writing method and productivity of science and engineering faculty’,Research in Higher Education 25, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R.T. (1987). ‘Writing performance, effects of cognitive strategies’,Written Communication 4, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R.T. (1990). ‘Effectiveness of pre-writing strategies as a function of task demands’,American Journal of Psychology 103, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D., and Wason, P.C. (1977). ‘Academics and their writing’,Times Literary Supplement, June 24th, p. 782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhashi, A. (1987). ‘Revising the plan and altering the text’, in Matsuhashi, A. (ed.),Writing in Real Time. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nold, E.W. (1981). ‘Revising’, in C.H. Frederiksen and J.F. Dominic (eds.),Writing, process, development and communication. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, S. (1979). ‘The composing process of unskilled college writers’,Research in the Teaching of English 13, 314–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. M., and Pugh, D.S. (1987).How to get a Phd: Managing the peaks and troughs of research. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, E. (1984). ‘Research in Postgraduate Education’,Higher Education Research and Development 3, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, E. (1985).A new look at postgraduate failure.Guildford:Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, N. (1980). ‘Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers’,College Composition and Communication 31, 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, M., Thomas, G.V., and Robinson, E.J. (1991). ‘Strategies for answering examination essay questions: Is it helpful to write a plan?’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 61, 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, M., Thomas, G.V., and Robinson, E.J. (1992). ‘The writing experiences of social science research students’,Studies in Higher Education 17, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., and Robinson, E.J. (1993). ‘Training in research writing: An evaluation of three courses for postgraduate students’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1970). ‘On writing scientific papers’,Physics Bulletin 2, 407–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1985). ‘How to write an essay’,New Psychologist, May 1985, 16–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanley, G., Reynolds, P. Similarity grouping of Australian universities. High Educ 27, 359–366 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01432075

Keywords

Navigation