Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative evaluation of various histological techniques for the rapid diagnosis of brain tumours

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Intraoperative procedures for the rapid histological diagnosis of space occupying intracranial processes are required. These currently include three major techniques: 1. crush preparations; 2. frozen sections with prefixation, and 3. frozen sections without prefixation. We have compared these techniques, using identical tissue material. While frozen sections of samples subjected to rapid fixation produce the best specimens, crush preparations are preferred wherever a well equipped laboratory is not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenhardt, L., Cushing, H., Diagnosis of intracranial tumors by supravital technic. Amer. J. Path.6 (1930), 541.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, Diagnosis of tumors by supravital technique. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.)28 (1932), 299.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Badt, D., Mikroskopische Schnelldiagnose bei hirnchirurgischen Eingriffen. Zbl. Neurochir.2 (1937), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, D. S., Krayenbühl, H., Cairns, H., The wet film technique in the histological diagnosis of intracranial tumors: a rapid method. J. Path.45 (1937), 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ziilch, K. J., Zur histologischen Schnelldiagnose bei der Operation von Hirngeschwülsten. Arch. klin. Chir.189 (1937), 492–493.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, A. A., The use of smear technique in the rapid histological diagnosis of tumors of the central nervous system. J. Neurosurg.4 (1947), 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kautzky, R., Die Schnelldiagnose intrakranialer Erkrankungen mit Hilfe des supravital gefärbten Quetschpräparates. Virchows Arch. path. anat.320 (1951), 495–550.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klatzo, I., McMillan, G. C., A new technique for the rapid diagnosis of brain tumors using chlorazol black E. Laboratory Invest.1 (1952), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zülch, K. J., Biologie und Pathologie der Hirngeschwülste. Teil D. Technische Methoden. d) Schnellverfahren. In: Handbuch der Neurochirurgie, Band III, p. 621. Ed. Olivecrona, H., und W. Tönnis. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dudgeon, L. S., Patrick, G. V., A new method for the rapid microscopic diagnosis of tumors with an account of 200 cases so examined. Brit. J. Surg.15 (1927), 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jane, J. A., Bertrand, G., A cytological method for the diagnosis of tumors affecting the central nervous system. J. Neuropath. Exp. Neurol.21 (1962), 400–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yashon, D., Jane, J. A., A cytologie method for the rapid diagnosis of neoplasms affecting the nervous system. Proc. Inst. Med. Chic.25 (1965), 318.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jane, J. A., Yashon, D., Cytology of tumors affecting the nervous system. Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C Thomas. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyermann, R., Kletter, G. Comparative evaluation of various histological techniques for the rapid diagnosis of brain tumours. Acta neurochir 35, 171–180 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405945

Keywords

Navigation