Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health planning rationality

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health planning theory has failed to operationalize the concept of rationality into terms useful for theory building. The concept of rationality has also generally not been translated into a useful tool for the health planning practitioner. In order to decrease the mystique associated with rationality and to aid in refinement of the concept, four attributes of health planning rationality are proposed:

  1. (1)

    Health planning rationality is “bounded” due to the magnitude of problems and man's limited problem-solving abilities;

  2. (2)

    Health planning rationality has multiple dimensions (technical, social, legal, political and economic);

  3. (3)

    The multiple dimensions of health planning rationality interact as complements and substitutes; and

  4. (4)

    Health planning rationality may be conceived of as the exposure of problems to cognitive processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyerson, M. and Banfield, E. C. (1955).Politics, Planning and the Public Interest, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, pp. 314–315.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, J. F. (1967). “A Conceptual Model for the Analysis of Planning Behavior,”Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (September), 225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dahl, R. A. and Lindblom, C. E. (1963).Politics, Economics, and Welfare, New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simon, H. (1957). “Rationality and Administrative Decision-Making,” in Simon, Herbert A.,Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schooler, D. (1970). “Political Arenas, Life Styles, and the Impact of Technologies on Policymaking,”Policy Sciences 1 (1970), 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schooler, D.,ibid., “ p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Von Mises, L. (1960).Epistomological Problems of Economics. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, B. (1960).Bertrand Russell Speaks His Mind. New York: Avon Book Division—The Hearst Corporation, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diesing, P. (1962).Reason in Society. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold, M. F. (1971). “Tools for Planning,” Arnold, M. F., Blankenship, L. V. and Hess, J. M., eds.,Administering Health Systems: Issues and Perspectives. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, pp. 250–262.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boulding, K. (1967). “The Boundaries of Social Policy,”Social Work 12: 1 (January), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahl, R. A. and Lindblom, C. E. (cited in reference 3 ().

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania

    David E. Berry

Authors
  1. David E. Berry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berry, D.E. Health planning rationality. Policy Sci 4, 13–19 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404929

Keywords

Search

Navigation