Summary
A comparison of fungal populations in the rhizospheres of eight varieties of peanut grown in a red lateritic soil amended with farmyard manure was made by the dilution-plate technique. There was a marked increase in fungi in the rhizospheres of TMV 2, TMV 4, Pollachi Red and EC 1698, the increase was smaller in Spanish Improved and RS 1 while very little rhizosphere effect was shown by TMV 3 and Pondicherry 8. Age of the plant had a significant influence on numbers of fungi in the rhizosphere. High R/S ratios were obtained when the plants were 30 days old, at which time attained maximum vegetative growth and started to flower. The ratios gradually decreased after that age until the plants were three months old when there was again a small increase. This later rise in fungal populations is interpreted to be due to an increase in microbial activity around dead or senescent roots. No correlation could be established between numbers of root nodules produced by a variety and its rhizosphere effect. Preferential stimulation of certain fungi in the rhizosphere of some of the varieties was noticed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnihothrudu, V., Soil conditions and root disease. VIII. Rhizosphere microflora of some of the important crop plants of South India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B.37, 1–13 (1953).
Chesters, C. G. C. and Parkinson, D., On the distribution of fungi in the rhizospheres of oats. Plant and Soil11, 145–156 (1959).
Garrett, S. D., Biology of Root-infecting Fungi. Cambridge University Press (1956).
Katznelson, H., The “rhizosphere effect” of mangels on certain groups of micro-organisms. Soil Sci62, 343–354 (1946).
Katznelson, H., Lochhead, A. G. and Timonin, M. I., Soil micro-organisms and the rhizosphere. Botan. Rev.14, 543–587 (1948).
Katznelson, H. and Richardson, L. T., The microflora of the rhizosphere of tomato plants in relation to soil sterilization. Can. J. Research C.21, 249–255 (1943).
Krassilnikov, N. I., Rybalkina, A., Gabrilian, M. and Kondrativa, T., On the microbial characteristics of the soils beyond the Volga region. Tr. Konis. po Irrigacii Akad. Nouk. S.S.S.R.1, (1933).
Lochhead, A. G., Rhizosphere micro-organisms in relation to root-disease fungi.in Holton, C. S.,et al. (Eds.) Plant Pathology, Problems and Progress 1908–1958, p. 327–338. University of Wisconsin Press. (1959).
Montégut, J., Value of the dilution method.in: Parkinson, D. and Waid, J. S., (Eds.) The Ecology of Soil Fungi, p. 43–49. University of Liverpool Press. (1950).
Papavizas, G. C. and Davey, C. B., Extent and nature of the rhizosphere of Lupinus. Plant and Soil14, 215–236 (1961).
Peterson, E. A., Observations on fungi associated with plant roots. Can. J. Microbiol.,4, 257–265 (1958).
Ramachandra-Reddy, T. K., Foliar spray of urea and rhizosphere microflora of rice. Phytopath. Z.36, 286–289 (1959).
Starkey, R. L., Some influences of the development of higher plants upon the micro-organisms in the soil. II. Influence of the stage of plant growth upon abundance of organisms. Soil Sci.27, 355–378 (1929).
Starkey, R. L., Interrelations between micro-organisms and plant roots in the rhizosphere. Bacteriol. Rev.22, 154–160 (1958).
Timonin, M. I., The interaction of higher plants and soil micro-organisms. III. Effects of byproducts of plant growth on activity of fungi and actinomycetes. Soil Sci.52, 395–412 (1941).
Warcup, J. H., The soil plate method for isolation of fungi from soil. Nature (London)166, 117–118 (1950).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, A.S. Fungal populations in the rhizosphere of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Soil 17, 260–266 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01376228
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01376228