Climate Dynamics

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 205–260 | Cite as

The dynamical range of global circulations—I

  • Gareth P Williams
Article

Abstract

The dynamical range of atmospheric circulations is examined by integrating a global circulation model (GCM) over a wide range of parameter values. We study the influence of rotation rate on moist and dry atmospheres with regular, drag-free, and interior-heated surfaces in Part I, and on axisymmetric, oblique, and diurnally heated moist atmospheres in Part II. Despite their variety, the circulations are composed of only a few elementary forms whose existence, scale, and mix alter as the parameters vary. These elements can be interpreted in terms of standard symmetric-Hadley (SH) and quasi-geostrophic (QG) theories. The natural-Hadley (NH) circulation consists of a polar jet and a hemispheric direct cell, such as occur in slowly rotating SH flows, together with Rossby waves generated by moist convection and barotropic cascades. The quasi-Hadley (QH) circulation consists of a tropical westerly jet and a narrow direct cell, such as occur in the low-latitude part of rapidly rotating SH flow, together with Rossby waves generated by baroclinic instabilities in the neighboring midlatitude part of the SH flows; it occurs only in moist atmospheres. The two QG circulations represent the two extremes of eddy momentum flux produced during eddy cycles-the special form of enstrophy acscade describing nonlinear baroclinically unstable wave growth and barotropic wave dispersion. The QGγ element has a latitudinally asymmetric wave dispersion that gives a poleward, jet-traversing momentum transport, while QGβ has a symmetric wave dispersion that gives a jet-converging momentum transport. Both elements have a westerly jet and three cells. (In Part II, we describe the solstitial symmetric-Hadley, the QG-Hadley, the diurnally modified NH, and the Halley circulations.) In moist atmospheres, NH circulations exist in the rotational low range\((\Omega ^* = 0 - {\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 4$}})\); overlapping QGγ and QH elements in the midrange\((\Omega ^* = {\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}} - 1)\); and QGγ, QGβ, and QH elements in the high range (Ω=2−8); here Ω=Ω/ΩE is the rotation rate normalized by the terrestrial value. In dry atmospheres, circulations follow a similar progression but have a simpler blend because they lack a QH element. Kinetic energy peaks at\(\Omega ^* = {\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 8$}}\) in the moist, Hadley-dominated atmospheres but at\(\Omega ^* = {\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}\) in the dry, QG-dominated atmospheres. Instability-generated Rossby waves propagate equatorward more easily in the westerlies of the diabatically driven (moist) Hadley cell than in the easterlies of the eddy-induced (dry) ditropic at Ω=0 to almost radiative-convective at Ω=8, while maintaining almost constant global means. In modified-surface systems, freeslip conditions eliminate the QH element from a moist atmosphere and allow strong deep easterlies to arise in low latitudes to balance the strongly barotropic westerly jets that occur in midlatitudes. In a regular dry atmosphere, enhanced surface heating in low latitudes imitates latents latent heating and produces a tropical circulation resembling that of the moist QH element. Overall, circulation theory works well in explaining the GCM states but does not, as yet, describe the interactions among elements or reveal how jet scales are determined, nor explain phenomena at the extremes of the parameter range.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, DG (1985) Wave-mean-flow interaction in the middle atmosphere. Adv Geophys 28A:249–275.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews DG, McIntyre ME (1986) Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical shear: The generalized Eliassen-Palm relation and mean flow acceleration. J. Atmos Sci 33:2031–2048.Google Scholar
  3. Baines PG (1976) The stability of planetary waves on a sphere. J. Fluid Mech 73:193–213.Google Scholar
  4. Basdevant C, Legras B, Sadourny R, Beland M (1981) A study of barotropic model flows: Intermittency, waves and predictability. J Atmos Sci 38:2305–2326.Google Scholar
  5. Charney JG (1974) The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current. J Meteor 4:135–163.Google Scholar
  6. Dickinson RE (1978) Rossby waves—long period oscillations of oceans and atmospheres. Ann Rev. Fluid Mech 10:159–195.Google Scholar
  7. Edmon HJ, Hoskins BJ, McIntyre ME (1980) Eliasden-Palm cross-sections for the troposphere. J Atmos Sci 37:2600–2616.Google Scholar
  8. Gill AE (1974) The stability of planetary waves on an infinte beta-plane. Geophys Fluid Dyn 6:29–47.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon CT, Stern WF (1982) A description of the GFDL global spectral model. Mon Weather Rev 110:625–644.Google Scholar
  10. Haltiner GJ, Williams RT (1980) Numerical prediction and dynamic meteorology. Wiley, New York, 477ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayashi Y (1974) Spectral analysis of tropical disturbances appearing in a GFDL general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 31:180–218.Google Scholar
  12. Held IM (1978) The vertical scale of an unstable baroclinic wave and its importance for eddy heat flux parameterizations. J Atmos Sci 35:572–576Google Scholar
  13. Held IM, Andrews, DG (1983) On the direction of eddy momentum flux in baroclinic instability. J Atmos Sci 40:2220–2231Google Scholar
  14. Held IM, Hoskins BJ (1985) Large-scale eddies and the general circulation of the troposphere. Adv Geophys 28A:3–31.Google Scholar
  15. Jeld IM, Hou AY (1980) Nonlinea axially symmetric circulations in a nearly inviscid atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 37:515–533.Google Scholar
  16. Hide R (1970) Equatorial jets in planetary atmospheres. Nature 225:254Google Scholar
  17. Hollingsworth A (1975) Baroclinic instability of a simple flow on the sphere. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 101:495–528.Google Scholar
  18. Holloway JL, Manabe S (1971) Simulation of climate by a global general circulation model. Mon Weather Rev 99:335–370.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt BG (1979a) The influence of the Earth's rotation rate on the general circulation of the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 36:1392–1408.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt BG (1979b) The effects of past variations of the Earth's rotation rate on climate. Nature 281: 188–191.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt BG (1982) The impact of large variations of the Earth's obliquity on the climate. J Meteorol Soc Japan 60:309–318.Google Scholar
  22. James IN, Gray LJ (1986) Concerning the effect of surface drag on the circulation of a baroclinic planitary atntosphere. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 112:1231–1250.Google Scholar
  23. Kraichnan RH (1967) Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys Fluids 10:1417–1423Google Scholar
  24. Leovy CB (1985) The general circulation of Mars: models and observations. Adv Geophys 28A:327–346Google Scholar
  25. Lorenz EN (1967) The nature and theory of the general circulation of the atmosphere. WMO, No. 218, TP. 115, 161 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorenz EN (1969) The nature of the global circulation of the atmosphere: a present view. In Corby GA (ed) The global circulation of the atmosphere, Roy. Meteorol. Soc., London, pp. 2–23.Google Scholar
  27. Manabe S, Holloway JL (1975) The seasonal variation of the hydrologic cycle as simulated by a global model of the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 80:1617–1649Google Scholar
  28. Manabe S, Strickler RF (1964) Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a convective adjustment. J Atmos Sci 21:361–385Google Scholar
  29. Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1967) Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J Atmos Sci 24:241–259.Google Scholar
  30. Manabe S, Smagorinsky J, Strickler RF (1965) Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Mon Weather Rev 93:769–798Google Scholar
  31. Manabe S, Holloway JL, Stone HM (1970) Tropical circulation in a time-integration of a global model of the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 27:580–613.Google Scholar
  32. Manabe S, Smagorinsky J, Holloway JL, Stone HM (1970) Simulated climatology of a general cireulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Part 3. Effects of increased horizontal computational resolution. Mon Weather Rev 98:175–212.Google Scholar
  33. Miyakoda K (1973) Cumulative results of testing a meteorological-mathematical model: Description of the model. Proc Roy Irish Acad 73A:99–130Google Scholar
  34. Phillips NA (1956) The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 82:123–164Google Scholar
  35. Plumb RA (1983) A new look at the energy cycle. J Atmos Sci 40:1669–1688Google Scholar
  36. Plumb RA (1986) Three-dimensional propagation of transient quasi-geostrophic eddies and its relationship with the eddy-forcing of the time-mean flow. J Atmos Sci 43:1657–1678Google Scholar
  37. Read PL (1986) Super-rotation and diffusion of axial angular momentum: II. A review of quasi-axisymmetric models of planetary atmospheres. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 112:253–272Google Scholar
  38. Rhines PB (1975) Waves and turbulence on a beta plane. J Fluid Mech 69:417–443Google Scholar
  39. Rhines PB (1977) The dynamics of unsteady currents. In: McCave IN, O'Brien JJ, Steele JM (eds) The Sea, Vol. 6. Wiley, New York, pp 189–318Google Scholar
  40. Rossow WB (1985) Atmospheric circulation of Venus. Adv Geophys 28A:347–379Google Scholar
  41. Salmon R (1982) Geostrophic turbulence. In: Topics in ocean physics, Proceedings of the ‘Enrico Fermi’ Summer School Ital. Phys. Soc., North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam, pp 30–78Google Scholar
  42. Schneider EK (1977) Axially symmetric steady state models of the basic state for instability and climate studies. Part 2. Nonlinear calculations. J Atmos Sci 34:280–296.Google Scholar
  43. Simmons AJ, Hoskins BJ (1976) Baroclinic instability on the sphere: Normal modes of the primitive and quasi-geostrophic equations. J Atmos Sci 33:1454–1477Google Scholar
  44. Simmons AJ, Hoskins BJ (1978) The life cycles of some nonliear baroclinic waves. J Atmos Sci 35:414–432Google Scholar
  45. Simmons AJ, Hoskins BJ (1980) Barotropic influences on the growth and decay of nonlinear baroclinic waves. J Atmos Sci 37:1679–1684Google Scholar
  46. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91:99–164Google Scholar
  47. Smagorinsky J, Manabe S, Holloway JL (1965) Numerical results from a nine-level general circulation model of the atmosphere. Mon Weather Rev 93:727–768Google Scholar
  48. Stone PH (1978) Baroclinic adjustment. J Atmos Sci 35:561–571Google Scholar
  49. Uryu M (1980) Acceleration of mean zonal flows by planetary waves. Ture Appl Geophys 118:661–693Google Scholar
  50. Wallace JM, Lau N-C (1985) On the role of barotropic energy conversions in the general circulation. Adv Geophys 28A:33–74Google Scholar
  51. Williams GP (1971) Baroclinic annulus waves. J Fluid Mech 49:417–449Google Scholar
  52. Williams GP (1978) Planetary circulations: 1. Barotropic representation of Jovian and terrestrial turbulence. J Atmos Sci 35:1399–1426Google Scholar
  53. Williams GP (1979a) Planetary circulations: 2. The Jovian quasi-geostrophic regime. J Atmos Sci 36:932–968Google Scholar
  54. Williams GP (1979b) Planetary circulations: 3. The terrestrial quasi-geostrophic regime. J Atmos Sci 36:1409–1435Google Scholar
  55. Williams GP (1985) Jovian and comparative atmospheric modeling. Adv Geophys 28A:381–429Google Scholar
  56. William GP, Holloway JL (1982) The range and unity of planetary circulations. Nature 297:295–299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gareth P Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAAPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations