Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes of professionals in providing maternity care in a primary health care system in Saudi Arabia

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was done on a sample of the primary care centers in the Al-Baha region, Saudi Arabia to assess the opinions of the medical and paramedical staff regarding the capability and acceptability of providing antenatal and intrapartum care in the primary health care setting. The study showed that 96% of all the respondents supported the provision of antenatal care services in primary health care with 60% of them giving the reason that it is more convenient for pregnant women.

90% of the respondents wanted the antenatal care to be delivered through special clinics and the majority of them wanted to give a greater role to the midwives in antenatal care. Questioned about the intranatal care provision in the centers, 98% of all the respondents agreed to the utilization of primary health care in such service. A similar percentage of them claimed to have the ability to do deliveries in the centers with existing facilities.

To avoid duplication of care and to best use of available resources, low risk pregnancies should be seen antenatally and delivered in the primary health care centres provided the quality of such care is kept under control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson, S., Maternity care: A duplication of resources.J Royal College Gen Pract, 35: 346–347; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, H., Draper J., Field S., and Hare M., Evaluation of an integrated community antenatal clinic,J. of Royal College Gen Pract, 37: 544–547; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe, S., House, W., and Garrett, T., Comparison of outcome of low-risk labour in an isolated general practice maternity unit and a specialist maternity hospital.J Royal College Gen Pract, 37: 484–487; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wijmenga, D., Home confinement: The positive results in Holland,J Royal College Gen Pract, 34: 425–430; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garrett, T., House, W., and Lowe, S., Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years.J Royal Gen College Pract, 37: 488–490; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, R., and Macfarlane, A., Place of delivery: a review,Br J Obstet Gyn, 93: 675–683; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hakansson, A. Comparison between the outcome of antenatal care led primarily by district physician or by Obstetrician.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 67: 639–644; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, M., Lloyd, I., Redman, S., Bull, M., and Turnbull, A.C.; A comparison of low risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care.Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 90: 118–122, 123–128; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, G, Edgar, W, Taylor, B, and Neal, D, How safe is general practitioner Obstetric?,Lancet, 2: 1287–1289; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tew, M., Place of delivery and perinatal mortality,J Royal College Gen Practit, 35: 390–394; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh G., New Programme of Antenatal Care in General Practice.Br Med J, 291: 646–648; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young, G., Are isolated maternity units run by General practitioners dangerous?Br Med J, 294: 744–746; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds, J., Yudkin P., and Bull, M., General Practitioner Obstetrics: does risk prediction work?,J. Royal College Gen Practit, 38: 307–310; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cavenagh, A. Philips K., Sheridan B., and Williams E., Contribution of isolated general practitioner maternity units,Br Med J, 288: 1438–1440; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, M., Chung, P., and MacGillivry, I., Is routine antenatal care worth while?,Lancet, 2: 78–80; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marsh, G., Cashman, H., and Russell, I., General Practitioner Obstetrics in the Northern Region in 1983.Br Med J, 290: 901–903; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richmond, G., An analysis of 3,199 patients booked for delivery in general practitioner obstetric unit,J Royal College Gen Practit, 27: 406–413; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zander, L., Watson, M., Taylor R., and Morrell, D., Integration of general practitioner and specialist antenatal careJ Royal College Gen Practit, 28: 455–458; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bull, M., Ten years experience in a general practice obstetric unit.J Royal College Gen Practit, 30: 208–215; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Abdulaziz N. Al-Nasser is Assistant Professor of Primary Health Care; Mohammed A. Al-Sekait is Assistant Professor of Community Medicine; Elijah A. Bamgboye is Assistant Professor of Medical Statistics; all in the Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia.

Wahid A. Khan is coordinator in the Primary Health Care Program, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Nasser, A.N., Al-Sekait, M.A., Khan, W.A. et al. Attitudes of professionals in providing maternity care in a primary health care system in Saudi Arabia. J Community Health 16, 1–10 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01340464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01340464

Keywords

Navigation