Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibition of gastric motor activity by 16, 16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2

A possible explanation of cytoprotection

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of 16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (16-dmPGE2) and necrotizing agents on gastric motility and gastric mucosa were studied in conscious rats. Gastric motility was determined using a miniature balloon positioned in the glandular part of the stomach, which was connected to a pressure transducer and polygraph. Necrotizing agents, such as absolute ethanol, 0.6 N HCl, 0.2 N NaOH, or 4 M NaCl, were instilled into the stomach through a small fistula prepared in the forestomach. One milliliter of these agents produced streak lesions in the glandular part of the stomach within 1 hr, which were preceded by violent gastric contraction in every case. An intragastric administration of 16-dmPGE2 (0.3–3 μg/kg) by itself increased a tonus of the gastric wall but dosedependently lessened the number and the amplitude of contractions. In those rats treated with 16-dmPGE2 (3 μg/kg), necrotizing agents failed to enhance the motility or to induce streak lesions. Pretreatment with 1 M NaCl as a mild irritant also inhibited gastric motility and lesion formation, but those actions were significantly antagonized by indomethacin (5 mg/kg). These results indicate that necrotizing agents induce a violent gastric contraction, followed by development of lesions in the stomach, and that the inhibition of gastric hypercontraction may be involved in a cytoprotective action of a prostaglandin against those induced gastric lesions in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Hanchar AJ: Cytoprotection by prostaglandins in rats; prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HCl, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl and thermal injury. Gastroenterology 77:433–443, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert A: Prostaglandins and the gastrointestinal tract.In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. LR Johnson et al (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1981, pp 1407–1434

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yano S, Akahane M, Harada M: Role of gastric motility in development of stress-induced gastric lesions of rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 28:607–615, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mersereau WA, Hinchey EJ: Prevention of phenylbutazone ulcer in the rat by glucose; role of a glycoprivic receptor system. Am J Physiol 242:G429-G432, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mersereau WA, Hinchey EJ: Role of gastric mucosal folds in formation of focal ulcers in the rat. Surgery 91:150–155, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen A, Garner A: Progress report; mucus and bicarbonate secretion in the stomach and their possible role in mucosal protection. Gut 21:249–262, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garner A, Heylings JR: Stimulation of alkaline secretion in amphibian isolated gastric mucosa by 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 and F2; a proposed explanation for some of the cytoprotective action of prostaglandins. Gastroenterology 76:498–503, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  8. Main IHM, Whittle BJR: The effects of E and A prostaglandins on gastric mucosal blood flow and acid secretion in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 49:428–431, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  9. Svanes K, Takeuchi K, Ito S, Silen W: Effect of destruction of gastric surface epithelium by hypertonic NaCl on endogenous prostaglandin formation. Surg Forum 32:119–121, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mersereau WA, Hinchey EJ: Dissolution of mucosal folding by prostaglandin; an explanation of cytoprotection. Gastroenterology 80:1230, 1981 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takeuchi K, Okabe S, Takagi K: A new model of stress ulcer in pylorus-ligated rats and its pathogenesis. Am J Dig Dis 21:782–788, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konturek SJ, Brozozowski T, Piastucki I, Radecki T, Dembinski A, Dembinska-Kiec A: Role of locally generated prostaglandins in adaptative gastric cytoprotection. Dig Dis Sci 27:967–971, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milenov K, Golenhofen K: Contractile responses of longitudinal and circular smooth muscle of the canine stomach to prostaglandins E2 and F. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med 8:287–300, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mersereau WA, Hinchey EJ: The effect of a mild irritant on mucosal folding and the action of indomethacin. Gastroenterology 82:1130, 1982 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lancaster C, Nezamis JE, Robert E: Dissolution of gastric mucosal folds does not explain cytoprotection by prostaglandins. Gastroenterology 82:1110, 1982 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeuchi, K., Nobuhara, Y. Inhibition of gastric motor activity by 16, 16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 . Digest Dis Sci 30, 1181–1188 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01314054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01314054

Keywords

Navigation