Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical and physiological study of anal sphincter and Ileal J pouch before preileostomy closure and 6 and 12 months after closure of loop ileostomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spontaneous evolution of pouch and anal function, and absorption features has been assessed in 15 patients who underwent proctocolectomy with J ileal pouch anastomosis without conservation of a rectal muscular cuff. All the patients were studied before preileostomy closure and six and 12 months after the closure of the protection loop ileostomy. Stool frequency was identical at six and 12 months (mean ±sem: 5.0±0.4 and 5.3±0.5/day, respectively). Sixty-six percent of patients at six months and 40% of patients at 12 months need to defecate at least one time during night. Stool weight as well as steatorrhea decreased significantly six months after the closure of loop ileostomy (P<0.05). Mean resting anal pressure remained unchanged six and 12 months after closure of the loop ileostomy (41±6 and 45±5 cm H2O, respectively). Maximum squeeze anal pressures increased significantly at six (P<0.05) and 12 months (P<0.05). The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was always absent at the same period. The maximum pouch capacity increased significantly during the first six months (P<0.01) from 142±17 to 279±27 ml. The maximum infused volume during a saline continence test was not significantly different at six and 12 months; the percentage of evacuation of the reservoir and the volume at which the first ileal contraction appeared in the reservoir increased significantly (P<0.05) at six and 12 months. In conclusion, in patients with ileoanal anastomosis and pouch reservoir, the closure of the loop ileostomy is associated with spontaneous modifications of the anal and pouch parameters. These modifications must be taken under consideration in the functional evaluation of these patients. Early dilatation of the reservoir as well as early reeducation of the anal sphincter do not seem to be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dozois RR: Operations for ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 24(158):56–58, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholls RJ, Moskovits RL, Shepherd NA: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 72:76–79, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  3. Telander RL, Perrault J, Hoffman AD: Early development of the neorectum by balloon dilatations after ileo-anal anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 16:911–916, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hautefeuille P, Valleur P, Perniceni T, Martin B, Galian A, Cherqui D, Hoang C: Functional and oncologic results after colo-anal anastomosis for low rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 207:61–64, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van De Kammer JH, Huinink HTB, Weyers HA: Rapid method for the determination of fat in feces. J Biol Chem 177:347–355, 1949

    Google Scholar 

  6. Florent C, L'Hirondel C, Desmazures C, Aymes C, Bernier JJ: Intestinal clearance of alpha-1 antitrypsin. Gastroenterology 81:777–780, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faverdin C, Dornic C, Ahran P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, Revillon Y, Pellerin D: Quantitative analysis of anorectal pressures in Hirschprung's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 24:422–427, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor BM, Beart RW, Phillips SF: longitudinal and radial variations of pressures in the human anal sphincter. Gastroenterology 86:693–697, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farthing MJG, Lennard-Jones J: Sensibility of the rectum to distension and the ano-rectal distension reflex in ulcerative colitis. Gut 19:64–69, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haynes WG, Read NW: Ano-rectal activity in man during rectal infusion of saline: A dynamic assessment of the anal continence mechanism. J Physiol 30:45–46, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelley KA, Beart RW, Wolf BG: Ileal “J” pouch anastomosis: Clinical outcome. Ann Surg 202:735–739, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  12. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly K: Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 153:157–164, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaussade S, Merite F, Hautefeuille M, Valleur P, Hautefeuille P, Couturier D: Motility of the jejunum after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anastomosis. Gut 30:371–375, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly DG, Branon ME, Phillips SF, Kelly KA: Diarrhea after continent ileostomy. Gut 21:711–716, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soper N, Orkin BA, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Brown M: Gastro-intestinal transit after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or ileostomy. J Surg Res 46:300–305, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72:470–476, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stryker SJ, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW: Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 203:55–61, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaussade S, Verduron A, Hautefeuille M, Risleight G, Guerre J, Couturier D, Valleur P, Hautefeuille P: Proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis without conservation of a rectal muscular cuff. Br J Surg 76:273–275, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nicholls RJ: Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir. World J Surg 11:751–762, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Hulten L: The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorect Dis 4:50–56, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnston D, Holdworth PJ, Nasmyth DG, Neal DE, Primprose JN, Womack N, Axon ATR: Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: A pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctetomy and endo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 74:940–944, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  22. O'Connel PR, Pemberton JH, Weiland LH, Beart RW: Does rectal mucosa regenerate after ileoanal anastomosis? Dis Colon Rectum 30:1–5, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stern H, Walfish S, Mullen B, McLeod R, Cohen Z: Cancer in an ileoanal reservoir: A new late complication? Gut 31:473–475, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oresland T, Fasth S, Hulten L, Nordgren S, Swenson L, Akervall S: Does balloon dilatation and anal sphincter training improve ileoanal-pouch function? Int J Colorect Dis 3:153–157, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  25. O'Connel PR, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA: Motor function of the ileal J pouch and its relation to clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 11:735–741, 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaussade, S., Michopoulos, S., Hautefeuille, M. et al. Clinical and physiological study of anal sphincter and Ileal J pouch before preileostomy closure and 6 and 12 months after closure of loop ileostomy. Digest Dis Sci 36, 161–167 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300750

Key words

Navigation