Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear ultrastructure: Morphometry of nuclei from various tissues ofCucurbita, Melandrium, Phaseolus, Tradescantia, andVicia

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The proportion of chromatin in the condensed state was determined in various tissues of five plant species. InVicia faba the influence of treatments with inhibitors of transcription and several growth temperatures was studied. No significant differences could be found except inPhaseolus vulgaris, where cell aging may contribute to some variation in chromatin organization, and in the highly specialized antipodal cells ofMelandrium dioicum, which exhibited an atypical nuclear ultrastructure. These quantitative data confirm earlier suggestions (Nagl 1979 a) that condensed chromatin in angiosperms is fairly species-specific, but not tissue-specific or function-related.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, P., 1977: Determinants of nuclear chromatin structure in Angiosperms. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. Biol. Végét., Ser. 12,18, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Barlow, S., 1980: Nuclear structures and cell differentiation within a root apex. Ann. Rep. Austr. Natl. Univ. Sch. Biol. Sci., 42.

  • —,Hines, E. R., 1981: Chromatin organization and cell differentiation in the root apex of maize. Ann. Rep. ARC Letcombe Lab.1980, 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasch, K., Sinclair, G. D., 1978: The organization, composition and matrix of hepatocyte nuclei exposed to α-amanitin. Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol.27, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derenzini, M., Pession-Brizzi, A., Betts-Eusebi, C., Novello, F., 1981: Relationship between the fine structural organization of chromatin and nucleic acid synthesis in regenerating rat hepatocytes. J. Ultrastruct. Res.75, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon, S. S., Miksche, J. P., 1982: DNA content and heterochromatin variations in various tissues of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Amer. J. Bot.69, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumm, A., Nagl, W., 1982: Loss of DNA and euchromatin in senescing leaf cells ofAllium. Mech. Ageing Devel.18, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimers, R., Deltour, R., 1981: Organization of transcribed and nontranscribed chromatin in isolated nuclei ofZea mays root cells. Eur. J. Biochem.23, 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirahara, S., 1980: Karyomorphological studies on somatic tissues inSpiranthes sinensis. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., Ser. B, Div. 2,17, 9–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., 1962: Differential rate in RNA synthesis between euchromatin and heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res.27, 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanny, J. C., Gontcharoff, M., 1978: Etude en microscopie électronique et par cytophotométrie à balayage de la structure et de la distribution de la chromatine dans les noyaux des cellules cartilagineuses deTriturus cristatus âgés au cours de la régénération. Wilhelm Roux's Arch.184, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1981: Analysis of the changes in the morphology and staining density characteristics of cartilagenous cell nuclei fromTriturus cristatus during aging and regeneration. J. Histochem. Cytochem.29, 1281–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, G., Kiefer, R., Moore, G. W., Salm, R., Sandritter, W., 1974: Nuclear images of cells in different functional states. J. Histochem. Cytochem.22, 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, J. G., 1974: Ultrastructural organization of plant cell nuclei. In: The cell nucleus, vol. 1 (Busch, H., ed.), pp. 149–185. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leber, B., Hemleben, V., 1979: Nucleosomal organization in active and inactive plant chromatin. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl.2, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl, W., 1976: Zellkern und Zellzyklen. Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979a: Nuclear ultrastructure: condensed chromatin in plants is species-specific (karyotypical), but not tissue-specific (functional). Protoplasma100, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979b: Condensed interphase chromatin in plant and animal cell nuclei: fundamental differences. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl.2, 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979c: Differential DNA replication in plants: a critical review. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.95, 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Chromosomen. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Condensed chromatin: species-specificity, tissue-specificity, and cell cycle-specificity, as monitored by scanning cytometry. In: Cell growth (Nicolini, C., ed.), pp. 171–218. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl, W., Peschke, W., 1982: Automatische Diagnose der artspezifischen Kern-Ultrastruktur sowie von Zellzyklusstadien bei Pflanzen mit Hilfe des Bildanalysesystems Leitz T.A.S. Leitz-Mitt. Wiss. Techn.8, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, L., 1972: Statistische Auswertemethoden, 3. Aufl. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, A. R., 1969: A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res.26, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugita, M., Sasaki, K., 1982: Transcriptional activation and structural alteration of wheat chromatin during germination and seedling-growth. Physiol. Plant.54, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A., 1982: Karyomorphological studies on somatic tissues inRaphanussativus. Mem. Fac. Educ. Ehime Univ., Ser. III,2, 11–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschermak-Woess, E., 1963: Strukturtypen der Ruhekerne von Pflanzen und Tieren. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagl, W., Cabirol, H., Lahr, C. et al. Nuclear ultrastructure: Morphometry of nuclei from various tissues ofCucurbita, Melandrium, Phaseolus, Tradescantia, andVicia . Protoplasma 115, 59–64 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293581

Keywords

Navigation