Summary
After impregnating root meristems with silver nitrate two types of small (< 1 Μm diameter) body can be seen in the nuclei. These have been termed “dense body” (DB) and “nucleolus-associated body” (NAB). The number of these bodies within a nucleus varies from species to species, but in general DBs are relatively numerous and lie in the nucleoplasm, while the NAB is usually solitary and lies on the surface of the nucleolus. Using nuclear volume as an indicator of the age of the nucleus since mitosis, the numbers of DBs and NABs were related to the nuclear growth cycle. In the meristem ofPisum sativum andZea mays DBs are characteristically present in early interphase; in some regions they persist in the nucleoplasm until the next mitosis, in other regions they disappear during interphase. DBs are probably pieces of the pellicle of ribonucleoprotein that coats mitotic chromosomes which have not coalesced (as does the remainder of the pellicle) to form the nucleolus at the start of interphase. NABs grow out from the nucleolar surface during the later stages of interphase. At the end of interphase there is on average 1 NAB per nucleolus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlow, P. W., 1981 a: Argyrophilic nuclear structures in root apices. In: Structure and Function of Plant Roots (Brouwer, R. et al., eds.), pp. 43–47. The Hague-Boston-London: Nijhoff/Junk.
—, 1981 b: Argyrophilic intranuclear bodies of plant cells. Experientia37, 1017–1018.
—, 1983: Nucleolus-associated bodies (karyosomes) in dividing and differentiating plant cells. Protoplasma115, 1–10.
Bouteille, M., Hernandez-Verdun, D., Dupuy-Coin, A. M., Bourgeois, C. A., 1982: Nucleoli and nucleolar-related structures in normal, infected and drug-treated cells. In: The Nucleolus (Jordan, E. G., Cullis, C. A., eds.), pp. 179–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaffal, K. P., Schneider, G. J., 1978: The changes in ultrastructure during fertilization of the colourless flagellatePolytoma papillatum with special reference to the configural changes of their mitochondria. Cytobiologie18, 161–173.
Giménez-Martín, G., De la Torre, C., Fernández-Gómez, M. E., González-Fernández, A., 1974: Experimental analysis of nucleolar reorganization. J. Cell Biol.60, 502–507.
González-Fernández, A., Aller, P., De la Torre, C., 1982: Stimulation of nucleologenesis by adenosine. Cell Biol. Internat. Reps6, 79–84.
Håkansson, A., Levan, A., 1942: Nucleolar conditions inPisum. Hereditas28, 436–440.
Hardin, J. H., Spicer, S. S., Green, W. B., 1969: The paranucleolar structure, accessory body of Cajal, sex chromatin, and related structures of rat trigeminal neurons; A cytochemical and ultrastructural study. Anat. Rec.164, 403–432.
Hawes, C. R., Juniper, B. E., Horne, J. C., 1981: Low and high voltage electron microscopy of mitosis and cytokinesis in maize roots. Planta152, 397–407.
Hernandez-Verdun, D., Bouteille, M., Ege, T., Ringertz, N. R., 1979: Fine structure of nucleoli in micronucleated cells. Exp. Cell Res.124, 223–235.
Jordan, E. G., Timmis, J. N., Trewavas, A., 1980: The plant nucleus. In: Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise, Vol. 1, The Plant Cell (Tolbert, N. E., ed.), pp. 489–588. New York and London: Academic Press.
Lafontaine, J. G., 1968: Structural components of the nucleus in mitotic plant cells. In: The Nucleus (Dalton, A. J., Haguenau, F., eds.), pp. 151–196. New York and London: Academic Press.
Mitchell, J. P., Van der Ploeg, M., 1982: Nuclear changes accompanying cell differentiating in stems ofPisum sativum L. Histochemistry75, 327–340.
Monneron, A., Bernhard, W., 1969: Fine structural organization of the interphase nucleus in some mammalian cells. J. Ultrastruct. Res.27, 266–288.
Moreno Díaz de la Espina, S., Risueño, M. C., Medina, F. J., 1982 a: Ultrastructural, cytochemical and autoradiographic characterization of coiled bodies in the plant cell nucleus. Biol. Cell44, 229–237.
—,Sánchez-Pina, M. A., Risueño, M. C., 1982 b: Localization of acid phosphatasic activity, phosphate ions and inorganic cations in plant nuclear coiled bodies. Cell Biol. Internat. Reps6, 601–607.
—,Risueño, M. C., Fernández-Gómez, M. E., Tandler, C. J., 1976: Ultrastructural study of the nucleolar cycle in meristematic cells ofAllium cepa. J. microscop. biol. cell.25, 265–278.
Phillips, S. G., Phillips, D. M., 1979: Nucleolus-like bodies in micronuclei of culturedXenopus cells. Exp. Cell Res.120, 295–306.
Risueño, M. C., Moreno Díaz de la Espina, S., 1979: Ultrastructural and cytochemical study of the quiescent root meristematic cell nucleus. J. submicroscop. Cytol.11, 85–98.
—,Fernández-Gómez, E., Giménez-Martín, G., 1973: Nucleoli under the electron microscope by silver impregnation. Mikroskopie29, 292–298.
—,Moreno Díaz de la Espina, S., Fernández-Gómez, M. E., Giménez-Martín, G., 1978: Nuclear micropuffs inAllium cepa cells. I. Quantitative, ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Cytobiologie16, 209–223.
Stockert, J. C., Díez, J. L., 1979: The formation of ribonucleoprotein droplets inChironomus salivary gland nuclei. Chromosoma74, 83–103.
—,Fernández-Gómez, M. E., Giménez-Martín, G., López-Sáez, J. F., 1970: Organization of argyrophilic nucleolar material throughout the division cycle in meristematic cells. Protoplasma69, 265–278.
Werz, G., 1962: Zur Frage der Elimination von RibosenucleinsÄure und Protein aus dem Zellkern vonAcetabularia mediterranea. Planta57, 636–655.
Williams, L. M., Jordan, E. G., Barlow, P. W., 1983: The ultrastructure of nuclear bodies in interphase plant cell nuclei. Protoplasma118, 95–103.
Woll, E., 1956: Zur Abgabe von Nucleolusstoffen an das Cytoplasma. Planta47, 299–302.
Woodard, J., Rasch, E., Swift, H., 1961: Nucleic acid and protein metabolism during the mitotic cycle inVicia faba. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.9, 445–462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barlow, P.W. Changes in the frequency of two types of nuclear body during the interphase of meristematic plant cells. Protoplasma 118, 104–113 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293066
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293066