Summary
Various types of cell motility have been observed and analyzed with techniques of increasing sensitivity and sophistication. Photokymography, cinemicrography and laser-Doppler spectroscopy have all made important contributions to our knowledge of cytoplasmic streaming and cell movement.
Now videomicroscopy is finding applications in recording and analyzing two different kinds of images. Video intensification microscopy by image intensifiers and silicon intensified target (SIT) video cameras is used to intensify images too dim to be viewed by eye or photographed. On the other hand, video enhanced microscopy uses a less sensitive chalnicon or other vidicon camera with adjustable amplification and offset to enhance the contrast and improve the resolution of microscopes that employ instrumental compensators.
Both of these videotechniques have greatly extended the usefulness of the optical microscope: image intensification to brighten dim images and video enhancement to improve the contrast and resolution so that even “submicroscopic” structures and events can be recorded. These video techniques can both be further extended by a frame memory, with which images can be further enhanced by computer processing. Still to be developed, however, are appropriate methods for automatic tracking of particle motions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. D., Allen, N. S., Travis, J. L., 1981: Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network ofAllogromia laticollaris. Cell Motility1, 291–302.
—,David, G. B., Nomarski, G., 1969: The Zeiss-Nomarski differential interference equipment for transmitted light microscopy. Z. wiss. Mikr. und Microtech.69, 193–221.
—,Travis, J. L., Allen, N. S., Yilmaz, H., 1981: Video enhanced contrast polarization (AVEC-POL) microscopy: a new method applied to the detection of birefringence in the motile reticulopodial network ofAllogromia laticollaris. Cell Motility1, 275–289.
- -Hayden, H. H.,Allen, N. S.,Breuer, A. C.,Lewis, L. J., 1981: Cytoplasmic transport: moving ultrastructural elements common to many cell types revealed by video-enhanced microscopy. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia (in press).
Breuer, A. C., Allen, R. D., Lewis, L. J., 1981: Rapid transport in neurites of “submicroscopic” structures: analysis by the new AVEC-DIC microscopy method. Neurology31, 118 a.
Corti, B., 1774: Osservazioni microscopiche sulla tramella e sulla circulazione del fluido in una pianta acquaiola. Lucca.
Ewart, A. J., 1903: On the physics and physiology of protoplasmic streaming in plants. London: Clarendon Press.
Flory, L. E., 1951: The television microscope. Cold Spring Harbor Symp.16, 505–509.
Freed, J. J., Lieeovitz, M. M., 1970: The association of a class of saltatory movements with microtubules in cultured cells. J. Cell Biol.45, 334–354.
Inoué, S., 1961: Polarizing microscope: design for maximum sensitivity. In: The Encyclopedia of Microscopy (Clark, G. L., ed.), pp. 480–485. New York: Reinhold.
—, 1981: Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality and speed in polarization-based microscopy. J. Cell Biol.89, 346–356.
—,Hyde, W. L., 1957: Studies on depolarization at lens surfaces. II. The simultaneous realization of high resolution and high sensitivity with the polarizing microscope. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.3, 831–838.
Kamiya, N., 1950: The rate of protoplasmic flow in the Myxomycete plasmodium. Cytologia15, 183–193.
—,Kuroda, K., 1956: Velocity distribution of protoplasmic streaming inNitella cells. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)69, 544–554.
— —, 1958: Studies on the velocity distribution of the protoplasmic streaming in the Myxomycete plasmodium. Protoplasma49, 1–4.
Mast, S. O., 1926: Structure, movement, locomotion and stimulation in amoeba. J. Morph. Physiol.41, 347–423.
Mustacich, R. V., Ware, B. R., 1977: A study of protoplasmic streaming inPhysarum polycephalum by laser Doppier spectroscopy. Protoplasma91, 351–368.
Nomarski, G., 1955: Microinterférométrie différentiale à ondes polarisées. J. Phys. Radium16, 9–135.
Parpart, A. K., 1951: Televised microscopy in biological research. Science113, 483–484.
-, 1964: Echinoderm granule motion in the eggArbacia punctulata. In: Primitive Motile Systems (Allen, R. D.,Kamiya, N., eds.), pp. 471–483. New York: N.Y.
Reynolds, G. T., 1968: Image intensification applied to microscope systems. In: Advances in Optical and Electron Microscopy (Barer, R., Cosslett, V., eds.), pp. 1–40. New York: Academic Press.
—,Taylor, D. L., 1980: Image intensification applied to light microscopy. Bio. Science30, 586–592.
Satelle, D. B., Buchan, P. F., 1976: Cytoplasmic streaming inChara corallina studied by laser light scattering. J. Cell Sci.22, 633–643.
Seifriz, W., 1922: A method for inducing protoplasmic streaming. New Phytol.21, 107–112.
Willinhgam, M. C., Pastan, I., 1978: The visualization of fluorescent proteins in living cells by video intensification microscopy VIM. Cell13, 501–507.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, R.D., Allen, N.S. Videomicroscopy in the study of protoplasmic streaming and cell movement. Protoplasma 109, 209–216 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287640
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287640