Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of the competitive share in Wisconsin counties, 1962–1972: The role of government policy

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research premise is that shift-share analysis can provide some useful policy information. The question addressed is: do governmental policies influence the competitive share of a county. Ordinary least squares regression is used to test the relationship between selected state and local government policy choices and the county's competitive share for the time periods of 1962–72, 1962–67, and 1967–72. The policy variables proved to have limited predictive power. The number of cities over 10,000 population, distance to Milwaukee/Minneapolis, percent employed in trade and service activities, and median family income were the strongest influences on county competitive share. The conclusion is that the proxies for state and local economic policy choices are either inadequate or county competitive share is not influenced by governmental action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashby, L. D., “The Shift and Share Analysis: A Reply,”Southern Economic Journal, Volume 34 (January 1968), pp. 423–425.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, H. J., “Shift and Share Projections of Regional Economic Growth: An Empirical Test,”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 9 (April 1969), pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buck, T. W., “Shift and Share Analysis--A Guide to Regional Policy,”Regional Studies, Volume 4 (December, 1970), pp. 445–450.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, H. C. and M. A. Goldberg, “Combining Intersectoral Flows and Shift-Share Techniques: A Hybrid Regional Forecasting Model,”Annals of Regional Science, Volume 6 (June 1972), pp. 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, E. S., “A Statistical and Analytical Technique for Regional Analysis,”Papers Regional Association, Vol. 6 (1960), pp. 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs, V., “Statistical Explanation of the Relative Shift of Manufacturing Among Regions in the United States,”Papers Regional Science Association, Vol. 8 (1962), pp. 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon, J. R. and D. Darling, “Measuring Economic Growth in Rural Communities; The Shift-Share Approach,” paper presented to 1976 meeting of the Mid-Continent Section of the Regional Science Association, Bowling Green University.

  8. Houston, D. B., “The Shift and Share Analysis of Regional Growth: A Critique,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 33 (April, 1967), pp. 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perloff, H. S., E. S. Dunn, E. E. Lampard and R. F. Muth,Regions, Resources and Economic Growth, The John Hopkins Press: Baltimore, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weaver, R. and M. McMillan,Factors Influencing Manufacturing Change in Small Wisconsin Cities, 1960–1970, Research Bulletin R2776, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, January 1976.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaffer, R. Determinants of the competitive share in Wisconsin counties, 1962–1972: The role of government policy. Ann Reg Sci 13, 67–80 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284781

Keywords

Navigation