Abstract
A highly efficientin vitro regeneration methodology for mature chutese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum Roxb.) has been developed. Shoot segments cultured on MS medium supplemented with 7.5 µM NAA produced light green callus. Optimum shoot differentiation resulted when callus was transferred to MS medium with 1 µM BA and 0.25 µM NAA. Shoot forming ability of callus was higher on MS medium compared to B5, half-MS or WPM. A continuous shoot harvest system at four-week intervals was established. Shoot yield continued for six months without loss of vigour. Regenerated shoots were rooted by culturing on half strength agar-gelled MS medium containing 1 µM IBA. Rooted plantlets were transferred to 1:1 soil vermiculite mixture and acclimatized with 67 % survival rate. Fully acclimatized plants were planted in the field, and performance is being evaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 2, 4- D:
-
2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
- NAA:
-
1 - napthaleneacetic acid
- BA:
-
benzyladenine
- Kn:
-
kinetin
- 2-ip:
-
6 - (γ, γ -dimethylallylamino)-purine
- IBA:
-
indole-3-butyric acid
- WPM:
-
woody plant medium (1980)
- MS:
-
Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium
- B5:
-
Gamborg et al's medium (1968)
References
Amin MN, Razzaque MA (1993) J Hort Sci 68: 551–556
Dunstan DI, Thorpe TA (1986) In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol 3, Academic Press, New York, pp 223–241
Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158
Hussey G (1983) In: Mantell SH and Smith H (eds) Plant Biotechnology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–138
Kotwal MM, Gupta PK, Mascarenhas AF (1983) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 2: 133–139
Lloyd GB, McCown BH (1980) Comb Proc Int Plant Propagators Soc 30: 421–427
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by W. Parrott
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siril, E.A., Dhar, U. A highly efficientin vitro regeneration methodology for mature Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum Roxb.). Plant Cell Reports 16, 83–87 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275456
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275456