Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient transgenic plant regeneration throughAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three genotypes of chickpea ICCV-1, ICCV-6 and a Desi (local) variety were tested for plant regeneration through multiple shoot production. The embryo axis was removed from mature seeds, the root meristem and the shoot apex were discarded. These explants were cultured on medium containing MS macro salts, 4X MS micro salts, I35 vitamins, 3.0 mg/1 BAP, 0.004 mg/1 NAA, 3% (w/v) sucrose and incubated at 260C. The explants were transformed withAgrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 with binary vector pBI121 containing theuidA andnptIl genes. Multiple shoots were repeatedly selected with kanamycin. The selected kanamycin resistant shoots were rooted on MS medium supplemented with 0.05 mg/1 113A. The presumptive transformants histochemically stained positive for GUS. Additionally, nptll assay confirmed the expression ofnptII in kanamycin resistant plants. Transgenic plants were transferred to soil and grown in the green house.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-benzylamino purine

2,4-D:

2,4dichlorophenoxy acetic acid

IAA:

Indole acetic acid

IBA:

Indole butaric acid

NAA:

Naphthalene acetic acid

References

  • Bajaj YPS, Dhanju MS (1979) Current Sci 48: 906–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Barna KS, Wakhlu AK (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 521–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Barna KS, Wakhlu AK (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 510–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwale UB, Kerns HR, Widholm JM (1986) Planta 167:473–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercetche J, Chriqui D, Adam S, David C (1987) Plant Science 52:195–210

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kathen, Jacobsen HJ (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9: 276–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen S, Kofler F, Gerdemann M, Schieder O (1987) Theor Appl Genet 75:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana GS, Santini L, Caretto S, Frugis G, Mariotti D (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 194–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50: 152–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchee MAV, Connor-Ward DV, Newell CA, McDonnel RE, Sato SJ, Gasser CS, Fischhoff DA, Re DB, Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1988) Bio/Technol 6: 915–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema A, Hirsh PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) Nature 303: 179–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey G, Johnson RD, Warren S (1989) Protoplasma 148: 101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Malik T, Husnain T, Riazuddin S (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 561–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol Biol Rept 5:387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan M (1987) EMBO J 6: 3901–3907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JS, Marcker KA, Otten L, Schell J, (1986) Nature 321: 669–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartha KK, Pahl K, Leung NL, Mroginski LA (1981) Can J Bot 59: 1671–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar VD, Kirti PB, Sachan JKS, Chopra VL (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13: 468–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe K, Bowen B, Hoerster G, Ross M, Bond D, Pierce D, Gordon-Kamm B (1995) Bio/Technol 13: 677–682

    Google Scholar 

  • McKently AH, Moore GA, Doostdar H, Niedz RP (1995) Plant Cell Rep 14: 699–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti D, Fontana GS, Santini L (1989) J Genet & Breed 43: 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti D, Davey MR, Draper J, Freeman JP, Cocking EC (1984) Plant Cell Physiol 25:473–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens LD, Cress DE (1985) Plant Physiol 77: 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Puonti-Kaerlas J, Eriksson T, Engstrom P (1990) Theor Appl Genet 80: 246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Puonti-Kaerlas J, Eriksson T, Engstrom P (1992) Theor Appl Genet 84: 443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagare AP, Suhasini K, Krishnamurthy KV (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12: 652–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

  • Schroeder HE, Schotz AH, Wardley-Richardson T, Spencer D, Higgins TJV (1993) Plant Physiol 101: 751–757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R, Draper J, Jefferson RA, Dury G, Jacob L (1988) In: Draper J, Scott R, Armitage P, Walden R (eds) Plant genetic transformation and gene express — A laboratory manual, Blackwell Scientific Publications

  • Sharma DR, Kumari R, Chowdhury JB (1979) Indian J Exp Biol 17:607–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Shri PV, Davis TM (1992) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 28: 4551

    Google Scholar 

  • Var der Have DJ (1979) In: Plant Breeding Perspectives, Pudco, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp. 270

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK (1985) In: Henka RR, Hughes KW, Constantin MP, Hollaender A (eds.) Tissue Culture in Forestry and Agriculture, Plenum Publishing Corporation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by W A. Parrott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kar, S., Johnson, T.M., Nayak, P. et al. Efficient transgenic plant regeneration throughAgrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell Reports 16, 32–37 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275444

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275444

Keywords

Navigation