Abstract
This article describes a model of adaptable learning which takes account of the interaction between affective and cognitive variables in learning situations. In addition, an instrument for measuring the relevant aspects of this model is introduced. We present some initial results of the application of this instrument in the domain of mathematics learning by students in the final year of primary education. Emphasis is placed on differences between boys and girls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boekaerts, M.: 1985, ‘Some new developments in the study of motivational processes in a classroom context’, in G. d'Ydewalle (ed.),Cognition Information Processing and Motivation (Vol. 3), North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 569–586.
Boekaerts, M.: 1988, ‘Motivated learning: Bias in appraisals’,International Journal of Educational Research 12, 267–280.
Boekaerts, M.: 1991, ‘Subjective competence, appraisals and self-assessment’,Learning and Instruction 1, 1–17.
Boekaerts, M.: 1992, ‘The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioral change’,Journal of Applied Psychology: An International Review 41, 377–397.
Boekaerts, M.: 1993, ‘Being concerned with well-being and with learning’,Educational Psychologist 28, 149–167.
Boswell, S.L.: 1985, ‘The influence of sex-role stereotyping in women's attitudes and achievement in mathematics’, in S.F. Chipman, L.R. Brush, and D.M. Wilson (eds.),Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 175–198.
Bower, G.H.: 1981, ‘Mood and Memory’,American Psychologist 36, 129–148.
Bower, G.H.: 1991, ‘Emotion and social perception’, a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, New Orleans.
Carver, C.S., and M.F. Scheier: 1988, ‘Performing poorly, performing well: A view of the self-regulatory consequences of confidence and doubt’,International Journal of Educational Research 12, 325–332.
Charles, R.I. and F.K. Lester: 1984, ‘An evaluation of a process-oriented instructional program in mathematical problem solving in grades 5 and 7’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 15, 15–34.
Crombach, M.J., M. Boekaerts and M.J.M. Voeten: 1994, ‘Quasi on-line measurement of appraisals of students faced with curricular tasks’,Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch,19, 301–317.
Eccles [Parsons], J., T.F. Adler, R. Futterman, S.B. Goff, C.M. Kaczala, J.L. Meece and C. Midgley: 1985, ‘Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences and the decision to enroll in mathematics’, in S.F. Chipman, L.R. Brush and D.M. Wilson (eds.),Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95–121.
Fennema, E. and T. Carpenter: 1981, ‘The national assessment and sex-related differences in mathematics’,Mathematics Teacher 1974, 554–559.
Fennema, E. and P.L. Peterson: 1985, ‘Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of gender-related differences in mathematics’, in C. Wilkinson and C.B. Marrett (eds.),Gender-Related Differences in Classroom Interactions, Academic Press, New York, pp. 17–35.
Fennema, E. and J. Sherman: 1977, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and sociocultural factors’,American Educational Research Journal 14, 51–71.
Fox, L.H., L. Brody and D. Tobin: 1985, ‘The impact of early intervention programs upon course-taking and attitudes in high school’, in S.F. Chipman, L.R. Brush, and D.M. Wilson (eds.),Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 249–274.
Friedman, L.: 1989, ‘Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks’,Review of Educational Research 59, 185–213.
Hall, C.W. and C. Hoff: 1988, ‘Gender differences in mathematical performance’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 19, 395–401.
Hart, L.E.: 1989, ‘Classroom processes, sex of student and confidence in learning mathematics’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30, 242–260.
Helmke, A.: 1990, ‘Selbstvertrauen und Schulische Leistungen (Self-confidence and academic achievement)’, Fakultät für Psychologie und Pädagogik der Ludwig-Maximilian Universität M ünchen.
Hyde, J.S., E. Fennema and S.J. Lamon: 1990, ‘Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis’,Psychological Bulletin 107, 139–155.
Koehler, M.S.: 1990, ‘Classrooms, teachers and gender differences in mathematics’, In E. Fennema and G.C. Leder (eds.),Mathematics and Gender, Teachers' College Press, New York, pp. 128–148.
Kimball, M.M.: 1989, ‘A new perspective on women's math achievement’,Psychological Bulletin 105, 198–214.
Lazarus, R.S. and S. Folkman: 1984,Stress, Appraisal and Coping, Springer Verlag, New York.
Lazarus, R.S. and R. Launier: 1978, ‘Stress-related transactions between person and environment’, in L.A. Pervin and M. Lewis (eds.),Perspectives in Interactional Psychology, Plenum, New York.
Leder, G.C.: 1986, ‘Mathematics: Stereotyped as a male domain?’,Psychological Report 59, 955–958.
Leder, G.C.: 1987, ‘Teacher student interaction: A case study’.Educational Studies in Mathematics 18, 255–271.
Leder, G.: 1992, ‘Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.),Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 597–622.
Lester, F.K.: 1983, ‘Trends and issues in mathematical problem solving research’, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds.),Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 229–261.
Lester, F., J. Garofalo and D. Kroll: 1989, ‘The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: A study of two grade seven classes’, Final Report to the National Science Foundation of NSF Project MDR 85-50346.
Mandler, G.: 1989, ‘Affect and learning: Causes and consequences of emotional interactions’, in D.B. McLeod and V.M. Adams (eds.),Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A New Perspective, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 3–19.
Mandler, G. and Y. Nakamura: 1987, ‘Aspects of consciousness’,Personality and Social Psychology 13, 299–313.
Marshall, S.P.: 1984, ‘Sex differences in children's mathematics achievement: Solving computations and story problems’,Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 194–204.
Marshall, S.P.: 1989, ‘Affect in schema knowledge: Source and impact’, in D.B. McLeod and V.M. Adams (eds.),Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 49–58.
Martin, D.J. and H.D. Hoover: 1987, ‘Sex differences in educational motivation: A longitudinal study’,Journal of Early Adolescence 7, 65–83.
McLeod, D.B.: 1992, ‘Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.),Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 575–596.
McLeod, D.B. and V.M. Adams (eds.): 1989,Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving: A new Perspective, Springer Verlag, New York.
Nicholls, J.G.: 1983, ‘Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation: A theory and its implications for education’, in S.G. Paris, G.M. Olson and H.W. Stevenson (eds.),Learning and Motivation in the Classroom, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 211–237.
Nicholls, J.G.: 1984, ‘Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation’, in R. Ames and C. Ames (eds.),Research on Motivation in Education (Vol. 1), Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 39–73.
Oakes, J.: 1990, ‘Opportunities, achievement and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics’, in C.B. Cazden (ed.),Review of Research in Education, American Educational Research Association, Washington, pp. 153–222.
Polya, G.: 1945,How To Solve It, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Schoenfeld, A.: 1983, ‘Beyond the purely cognitive: belief systems, social cognitions and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance’,Cognitive Science 7, 329–363.
Schoenfeld, A.: 1985,Mathematical Problem Solving, Academic Press, New York.
Schoenfeld, A.: 1989, ‘Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving’, in L.B. Resnick and B.L. Klopfer (eds.),Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research, American Society for Curriculum Development, Washington, DC, pp. 83–103.
Schoenfeld, A.: 1992, ‘Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics’, in D.A. Grouws (ed.),Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 334–370.
Seegers, G. and M. Boekaerts: 1993, ‘Task motivation and mathematics achievement in actual task situations’,Learning and Instruction 3, 133–150.
Seegers, G. and M. Boekaerts: 1995, ‘Gender-related differences in self-referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics’, Centre for the Study of Education and Instruction, Leiden University, submitted for publication.
Sherman, J.: 1980, ‘Mathematics, spatial visualization and related factors: Changes in girls and boys, grades 8–11,Journal of Educational Psychology 72, 476–482.
Silver, E.A.: 1985, ‘Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some under-represented themes and needed directions’, in E.A. Silver (ed.),Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 247–266.
Spence, J.T. and R.L. Helmreich: 1983, ‘Achievement-related motives and behaviors’, in J.T. Spence (ed.),Achievement and Achievement Motives, Freeman, San Francisco, pp.7–74.
Stipek, D.J. and J.H. Gralinski: 1991, ‘Gender differences in children's achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics’,Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 361–371.
Van de Werf, M.P.C.: 1988,Meisjes en wiskunde: Het HEWET project [Girls and Mathematics: The HEWET project], RION, Groningen.
Wijnstra, J.M. (ed.): 1988, ‘Balans van het rekenonderwijs in de basisschool: Uitkomsten van de eerste rekenpeiling medio en einde basisonderwijs’, Arnhem: Centraal Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling. (Mathematics in primary education: First results of the Dutch national assessment program in education in grades 5 and 8. Arnhem, National Institute for Educational Measurement).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boekaerts, M., Seegers, G. & Vermeer, H. Solving math problems: Where and why does the solution process go astray?. Educ Stud Math 28, 241–262 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274175
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274175