Skip to main content
Log in

Circumventing visual limitations in teaching the geometry of shapes

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the limitations of visual perceptions in the formation of geometric meaning. Haptic exploration, which is the intentional movements of one's hands about an object, is proposed as an alternative approach for the teaching of geometric shapes. Haptic exploration strategies are addressed in relation to the development of geometric thought and also as a contribution to an activity-based learning environment. Results are presented from a study, that implemented this approach in lower secondary school mathematics classes in Greece, Scotland and the U.S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abravanel, E.: 1981, ‘Integrating the information from eyes and hands: A developmental approach’, in R.D. Walk and H.L. Pick, Jr. (eds),Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A.J.: 1983, ‘Space and geometry’, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds),Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, Academic Press, Inc., USA, pp. 175–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P.: 1974,Perception and Understanding in Young Children: An Experimental Approach, Methuen & Co Ltd., UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W.F. and Shaugnessy, J.M.: 1986, ‘Characterising the van Hieles levels of development in geometry’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17(1, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Grande, J.J.: 1990, ‘Spatial sense’,Arithmetic Teacher 37(6, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Grande, J.J.: 1987, ‘Spatial perception and geometry’, in NCTM 1987 Yearbook.Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12, USA, pp. 126–135.

  • Denmark, T. and Kepner, H.S.Jr.: 1980, ‘Basic skills in mathematics: A survey’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11(2, 104–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1963,Experience and Education, Collier-Macmillan Co., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, L., Brown, M., and Gibson, O.: 1991,Children Learning Mathematics, Cassel Educational Ltd, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dromazos, S.I.: 1982,Aristotelous Poetics, Kedros, Athens, Hellas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenk, M.W. and Keane, M.T.: 1990,Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Publ., UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielker, D.: 1988, ‘Metaphors and models’,Mathematics Teaching 124, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H.: 1973,Mathematics as an Educational Task, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R.: 1989, ‘Visualisation in geometry — Two sides of the coin’,Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11(1, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, A.: 1983, ‘Van Hieles-based research’, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds),Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, Academic Press Inc., USA, pp. 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980,Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Rial, F.: 1989, ‘Metaphors and related concepts in mathematics: Parts I & II’,Mathematics Teaching 127, 50–52/130, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, S.: 1981, ‘Crossmodal and intersensory perception and the blind’, in R.D. Walk and H.L. Pick, Jr. (eds),Intersensory Perception and Sensory Integration, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1956,The Child's Conception of Space, Routledge & Kegan Paul, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, H.L. Jr.: 1980, ‘Tactual and haptic perception’, in R.L. Welsh and B.B. Blasch (eds),Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, American Foundation for the Blind, Inc., NY, pp. 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1987,Speaking Mathematically: Communication In the Mathematics Classrooms, Routledge & Kegan Paul, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B.: 1987, ‘Learning in school and out’,Educational Researcher 16(9, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, I.: 1986, ‘Conceptual categories’, in I. Roth and P. Frisby (eds),Perception and Representation: A Cognitive Approach, Open University Press, UK, pp. 18–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triadafillidis, T.A.: 1993,Practical Activities in Mathematics Learning, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E.H.: 1978,The Sense of Touch, translated by E.H. Ross and D.J. Murray, Academic Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H.G.: 1983,Perceptual and Motor Development, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by the Hellenic Scholarships Foundation. Thanks are due to Penelope Cecilia Papailias for her constructive remarks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triadafillidis, T.A. Circumventing visual limitations in teaching the geometry of shapes. Educ Stud Math 29, 225–235 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274092

Keywords

Navigation