Abstract
This study builds on previous investigations that have compared the mathematics achievement of Asian and American students by analyzing the arithmetical learning contexts of children in Taiwan and in the United States. To this end, interviews were conducted with parents and teachers to identify cultural beliefs about learning arithmetic, ten lessons were video-recorded in one classroom in each country to identify classroom social interaction patterns, and interviews were conducted with children to identify the level of sophistication of their arithmetical concepts. Consistent with previous research, the arithmetical understandings of the Chinese children were found to be generally more advanced than those of their American counterparts. The analysis of the other data sources indicates that these differences in understanding reflect two significant differences in the sociocultural context within which Chinese and American children learn arithmetic. First, the arithmetical learning activities in which the Chinese children engaged at home and in school appeared to give them greater opportunities to construct consistenst arithmetical concepts. These differences in the arithmetical learning activities used in the two countries in turn appear to reflect different cultural beliefs about what constitutes normal or natural development when children learn arithmetic. Second, the obligations the Chinese children attempted to fulfill in order to be effective in the classroom were such that they had greater opportunities to explain and to reflect on their arithmetical interpretations and solutions. This in turn gave them greater opportunities to reorganize their thinking and construct increasingly sophisticated arithmetical concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baratta-Lorton, M.: 1976,Mathematics Their Way: An Activity-Centered Mathematics Program for Early Childhood Education, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.
Bauersfeld, H.: 1988, ‘Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education’, in T. Cooney and D. Grouws (eds.),Effective Mathematics Teaching, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Reston, VA, pp. 27–46.
Bishop, A. J.: 1985a, ‘The social construction of meaning — A significant development for mathematics education?’,For the Learning of Mathematics 5(1), 24–28.
Bishop, A. J.: 1985b, ‘The social dimension of research into mathematics education’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Antonio, TX.
Cobb, P.: 1993, ‘Cultural tools and mathematical learning: A case study’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, April.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E. and McNeal, G.: 1992, ‘Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis’,American Educational Research Journal 29, 573–602.
Erickson, F.: 1986, ‘Qualitative methods in research on teaching’, in M. Wittrock (ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching, third ed., Macmillan, New York, pp. 119–161.
Fuson, K. C., Stigler, J. W. and Bartsch, K.: 1989, ‘Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, Mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20, 449–456.
Fuson, K. C. and Kwon, Y.: 1991, ‘Effects on children's addition and subtraction of the system of number words and other cultural tools’, in J. Bideaud and C. Meljac (eds.), Les chemins du numbre [Pathways to Number] Presses Universitaires de Lille, Villeneuve D'ascq, France.
Gay, J. and Cole, M.: 1967,The New Mathematics in an Old Culture, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Ginsburg, H. P.: 1982, ‘The development of addition in the contexts of culture, social class, and race’, in T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser and T. A. Romberg (eds.),Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 191–220.
Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich: 1985,Mathematics Today, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, Orlando, FL.
Lave, J.: 1982, ‘A comparative approach to educational forms and learning processes’,Anthropology and Education Quarterly 13, 181–187.
Mehan, H.: 1979,Learning lessons, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Minick, N.: 1989, ‘Mind and activity in Vygotsky's work: An expanded frame of reference’,Cultural Dynamics 2, 162–187.
Miura, I. T. and Okamoto, Y.: 1989, ‘Comparisons of U. S. and Japanese first graders' cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value’,Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 109–114.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1989,Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1991,Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
Posner, J.: 1982, ‘The development of mathematical knowledge in two West African societies’,Child Development 53, 200–208.
Rogoff, B.: 1990,Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rogoff, B. and Gardner, W.: 1984, ‘Adult guidance of cognitive development’, in B. Rogoff and J. Lave (eds.),Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 68–95.
Rogoff, B., Mosier, C., Mistry, J. and Goncu, A.: 1989, ‘Toddlers' guided participation in cultural activity’,Cultural Dynamics 2, 209–237.
Ross, S. H.: 1989, ‘Parts, wholes, and place value: A developmental view’,Arithmetic Teacher 36(7), 47–51.
Saxe, G. B.: 1991,Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in mathematical understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Scholnick, E. K.: 1988, ‘Why should developmental psychologists be interested in studying the acquisition of arithmetic’, in R. Cocking and J. Mestre (eds.),Linguistic and Cultural Influences on Learning Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 73–90.
Song, M. and Ginsburg, H. P.: 1987, ‘The development of informal and formal mathematics thinking in Korean and U. S. children’,Child Development 58, 1286–1296.
Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P. and von Glaserfeld, E.: 1988,Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Stevenson, H. W. and Lee, S. Y. (eds.): 1990, ‘Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children’,Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 55(181).
Stigler, J., Fernandez, C. and Yoshida, M.: 1992, ‘Children's thinking during mathematics instruction in Japanese and American elementary school classrooms’, paper presented at the International Congress on Mathematical Education, Québec City, August.
Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., Lucker, G. W. and Stevenson, H. W.: 1982, ‘Curriculum and achievement in mathematics: A study of elementary school children in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States’,Journal of Educational Psychology 74(3), 315–322.
Stigler, J. W. and Perry, M.: 1988, ‘Mathematics learning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classroom’, in G. B. Saxe and M. Gearharts (eds.),Children's Mathematics, Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, pp. 27–54.
Voigt, J.: 1985, ‘Patterns and routines in classroom interaction’,Recherches en didactique de mathematiques 6, 69–118.
Vygotsky, L.: 1978,Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Walkerdine, V.: 1988,The Mastery of Reason: Cognitive Development and the Production of Rationality, Routledge, London.
Yang, M. T.-L.: 1992, ‘An investigation of cultural variations in Chinese and American arithmetic learning contexts’, Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, M.TL., Cobb, P. A cross-cultural investigation into the development of place-value concepts of children in Taiwan and the United States. Educ Stud Math 28, 1–33 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273854
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273854