Skip to main content
Log in

Different aspects in designing mathematics education: Three examples from the Freudenthal Institute

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three teaching designs are offered. They were developed for 12 to 16 year old pupils taking into account their personal differences in terms of gender (in “Making Up the Cube”), culture (in “Mecca”), knowledge, and use of calculators in “The integrating calculator.” The designs concern the representation of three-dimensional objects in the plane, directions and great circles on the sphere, and exploration of the integrating calculator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, J. R.: 1981, “Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes”,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12(1), 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Burkhardt, H., Mcintosh, A., and Moore, G.: 1978,A calculator experiment in a primary school, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.

  • Bell, A. W. (ed.).: 1988,The Design of Teaching — Papers from PME Working Group, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham.

  • Bessot, A. and Eberhard, M.: 1982, “Représentations d'assemblage de cubes au C.E.”,Grand N, décembre, IREM, Université de Grenoble.

  • Bishop, A.: 1983, “Space and geometry”, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds.),Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 176–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, E. R.: 1990,Calculator Logic Systems and Mathematical Understandings, NCTM, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron-Pargue, J.: 1979,Etude sur les représentations du cube chez des enfants de 3 à 11 ans — La représentation et le codage de propriet és spatiales, Université de Paris.

  • Fasheh, M.: 1982, “Mathematics, culture and authority”,For the Learning of Mathematics 3(2), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H.: 1991,Revisiting Mathematics Education China: Lectures, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, C. and Puchalska, E.: 1983, “Representations on paper of three-dimensional shapes”, in J. Bergeron and N. Herscovics, N. (eds.),Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of PME-North American Chapter Volume 1, Université de Montréal.

  • Gaulin, C.: 1985, “The need of emphasizing various graphical representations of 3-dimensional shapes and relations”, in L. Streefland (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mmathematics Education, Volume 2: Plenary Addresses and Invited Papers, State University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, G.: 1979,3-D Sketching Series, DIME Projects, University of Stirling/Oliver & Boyd, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddijn, A.: 1980,Shadow and Depth, OW & OC, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, B. and Howson, A. G.: 1974,Mathematics, Society and Curricula, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, M. and De Lange, J. Jzn.: 1982,Lessons in Space Geometry, OW & OC, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M.: 1954,Mathematics in Western Culture, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. F.: 1983,Cross-cultural Studies in Cognition and Mathematics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, H.: 1985, “Selfdeveloping Strategies with a Calculator Game”, in L. Streefland (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 1, State University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M.: 1983, “Teaching decimal place value — A comparatrive study of ‘conflict’ and ‘positive only’ approaches”, in R. Hershkowitz (ed.),Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Rehovot, Israel.

  • Swetz, F. J.: 1978,Socialist Mathematics Education, Burgundy Press, Southampton, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffers, A.: 1987,Three Dimensions a Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Instruction — The Wiskobas Project, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J.: 1990a,Kubus make up (teaching unit), Freudenthal Institute/Stichting voor de Leerplan Ontwikkeling, Utrecht/Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J.: 1990b,W12–16 ZakRekenMachines (“W12/16 Pocket Calculators”, teaching units for 12–16 year olds), Freudenthal Institute/Stichting voor de Leerplan Ontwikkeling, Utrecht/Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J.: 1990c, “Integrerende zakrekenmachine” (Integrating calculator),Nieuwe Wiskrant 10(2), 34–39, Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J.: 1990d, “Kubus make up”,Nieuwe Wiskrant,10(1), 46–51, Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J.: 1992, “Making up the cube”,Mathematics Teaching 138, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J. and Meeder, M.: 1991a,Mekka (Mecca, teaching unit), Freudenthal Institute/Stichting voor de Leerplan Ontwikkeling, Utrecht/Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. J. and Meeder, M.: 1991b, “Mecca”,Mathematics Teaching 137, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S.: 1964,Denken und Sprechen, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B.: 1972,Theories of Motivation: From Mechanism to Cognition, Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.: 1985, “Taking Responsibility in School Mathematics Education”, in L. Streefland (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 2: Plenary Addresses and Invited Papers, State University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Den Brink, J. Different aspects in designing mathematics education: Three examples from the Freudenthal Institute. Educ Stud Math 24, 35–64 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273294

Keywords

Navigation