Skip to main content
Log in

Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zum gestielten Dünndarm-transplantat als partieller extrahepatischer Gallengangsersatz

Pedicle graft of small bowel as a partial replacement of the extrahepatic bile duct

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A pedicle graft of the jejunum can in some cases enlarge a bile duct stricture. The enlargement of the patch and its consequences on the liver function are possible problems. In an animal experiment the following questions were sought. 1) Is a partial replacement of the bile duct with a pedicle graft of small bowel possible? 2) Is there an enlargement of the patch in every case and what are the consequences on the biliary tract and on liver function. The experiments were performed on 14 minipigs over a long-term observation period of 450 days. The red and white blood cell count, the GPT, GOT, GPT, bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase and copper were checked monthly. After 2, 6 and 12 months the intra- and extrahepatic biliary tract were visualized via a PTC. After 8 months an angiography of the pedicle graft was performed. 15 months later the animals were killed and the bile duct, the graft and the liver were histologically examined. 1) With a pedicle graft of small bowel a partial replacement of the extrahepatic bile duct is possible. 2) An enlargement of the patch is seen in every case. The enlargement is a consequence of tension at the pedicle. After 15 months no morphological changes were observed at the patch nor were there any irregularities in liver function.

Zusammenfassung

Mit einem gestielten Dünndarmpatch konnte in Einzelfällen eine Gallengangsstriktur dauerhaft erweitert werden. Man beobachtet jedoch eine Dilatation des Patches, deren Ursache ebenso wie deren Folgen auf die Leberfunktion bislang ungeklärt sind. Mit einem gestielten Dünndarmpatch ist tierexperimentell ein partieller extrahepatischer Gallengangsersatz möglich. Eine Erweiterung des Patches wird regelmäßig beobachlet. Ursache hierfür ist weder eine Denervation des Patches noch der intraduktale Gallengangsdruck, sondern möglicherweise ein Zug am Gefäßstiel. Morphologische Veränderungen treten am Patch nach bis zu 15 Monaten nicht auf. Leberfunktionsstörungen können weder laborchemisch noch histologisch nachgewiesen werden. Der gestielte Darmpatch stellt daher eine gute Möglichkeit zum partiellen Gallengangsersatz tar. Im Gegensatz zu einer Choledochuszyste scheint die regelmäßig zu beobachtende Dilatation des Patches aufgrund der erhaltenen Kontraktionsfähigkeit nicht zu einer Stase der Galle mit Entwicklung von Cholangitiden oder Konkrementen zu führen. Voraussetzung für these Operationstechnik ist allerdings ein freier Abluß über die Papille.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Andren-Sandberg A, Alinder G, Bengmark S (1985) Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 201:328

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aust JB, Root HD, Urdaneta L, Varco RL (1967) Biliary stricture. Surgery 62:601

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson HJO, Broome AEA, Rimer U (1986) Repair of bile duct defect with full-thickness vascularized jejunal patch. World J Surg 10:510

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bismuth H (1982) Postoperative strictures of the bile duct. In: Blumgart LH (ed) The biliary tract. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bismuth H, Franco D, Corlette MB, Hepp J (1978) Long-term results of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:161

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blumgart LH, Kelley CJ, Benjamin IS (1984) Benign bile duct stricture following cholecystectomy: critical factors in management. Br J Surg 71:836

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blumgart LH, Thompson JN (1987) The management of benign strictures of the bile duct. Curr Probl Surg 24:1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Böttger Th, Werel C, Junginger Th (1990) Langzeitergebnisse nach Korrektureingriffen wegen iatrogener Gallenwegsverletzungen. Chirurg 61:396–401

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braasch JW, Bolton JS, Rossi RL (1981) A technique of biliary tract reconstruction with complete follow-up in 44 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 194:635

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castrini G, Pappalardo G (1981) Iatrogenic strictures of the bile ducts. Our experience with 66 cases. World J Surg 5:753

    Google Scholar 

  11. Condon RE, Callen PM, Beltz WR, Van Meter SW, Pissiotis CA, Nichols RL (1974) Serosal only repair of common duct stricture. Am J Surg 127:13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dragojevic B, Landes Th, Horsch S, Pichlmaier H, Bohr M (1978) Gallengangsplastik mit gestieltem Jejunum-Transplantat. Langenbecks Arch Chir 346:167

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunphy JE, Stephens FO (1962) Experimental study of the effect of grafts in the common duct on biliary and hepatic function. Ann Surg 155:906

    Google Scholar 

  14. Glodek P, Oldigs B (1981) Das Göttinger Miniaturschwein, I. Aufl. Parey, Berlin Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hess W (1974) Akzidentelle und iatrogene Verletzungen der Gallenwege. Helv Chir Acta 41:639

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen SL, Nielsen OV, Lenz K (1978) Fat malabsorption in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 147:561

    Google Scholar 

  17. Junginger Th, Böttger Th, Augustin N (1988) Das gestielte Jenjunumtransplantat — eine Möglichkeit zum partiellen Gallengangsersatz. Chirurg 59:284

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirby CK, Fitts WT (1950) Reconstruction of the bile ducts with an isolated segment of jenjunum. Arch Surg 64:462

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lane CE, Sawyers JL, Riddell DH, Scott WM (1973) Longterm results of Roux-en-Y hepatocholangiojejunostomy. Ann Surg 117:714

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mathisen O, Bergan A, Flatmark A (1978) Iatrogenic bile duct injuries. World J Surg 11:392

    Google Scholar 

  21. McArthur MS, Longmire WP (1971) Peptic ulcer disease after choledochojejunostomy. Am J Surg 122:155

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pappalardo G, Correnti S, Mobarhan S, Tretino P, Pietropaolo A, Frattaroli F, Castrini G (1982) Long-term results of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunoduodenostomy. Ann Surg 196:149

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rutledge RH (1983) Methods of repair of noncircumferential bile duct defects. Surgery 93:33

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rutledge RH (1986) Invited commentary. World J Surg 10:514

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallenstein S, Holmström B (1959) Reconstruction of the common duct with an isolated segment of jejunum. Acta Chir Scand 117:316

    Google Scholar 

  26. Warren KW, McDonald WM (1964) Facts and fiction regarding strictures of the extrahepatic bild ducts. Ann Surg 159:996

    Google Scholar 

  27. Williams J, Bender CE, May G (1988) Benign postoperative biliary strictures: dilatation with fluoroscopic guidance. Radiology 163:629–634

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wyatt AP, Belzer FO, Dunphy JE (1967) Malfunction without constriction of the common bile duct. Am J Surg 113:592

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zittel RX (1969) Leberschädigungen nach biliodigestiven Anastomosen. Langenbecks Arch Chir 325:430

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böttger, T., Mann, B., Pickel, B. et al. Tierexperimentelle Untersuchungen zum gestielten Dünndarm-transplantat als partieller extrahepatischer Gallengangsersatz. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 376, 77–84 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263464

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263464

Key words

Navigation