Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Die chirurgische Therapie des stenosierenden Ulcus duodeni —Ergebnis einer unkontrollierten Vergleichsstudie

Surgical therapy in stenonising duodenal ulcer

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an uncontrolled trial on 77 patients we investigated the results of different surgical procedures in stenosis secondary to duodenal ulcer. The assignment to a procedure was dependent on the preference of the surgeon. The follow-up investigation after a mean observation time of 40–42 months was performed without knowledge of the surgical procedure. The postoperative mortality was 6.6% after resection, 0% after vagotomy and drainage. Postoperative sequelae were lowest in highly selective vagotomy + gastroduodenostomy (Visick I in 15 out of 17). After resection only 15 out of 33 had Visick 1. The worst result was obtained after selective vagotomy and pyloric dilatation (4 out of 9 Visick IV). This procedure has been given up.

Zusammenfassung

In einer unkontrollierten Vergleichsstudie an 77 Patienten wurden die Ergebnisse verschiedener Operationsverfahren beim stenosierenden Ulcus duodeni untersucht. Die Zuordnung zu den Verfahren erfolgte nach Präferenz des Operateurs. Die Nachuntersuchung erfolgte ohne Kenntnis des Operationsverfahrens im Median 40–42 Monate nach dem Eingriff. Die postoperative Letalität betrug nach Resektion 6,6%, nach Vagotomie + Drainage 0%. Hinsichtlich der postoperativen Folgeerscheinungen schnitt die selektiv proximale Vagotomie + Gastroduodenostomie mit 15 von 17 Visick I am besten ab. Bei der Resektion hatten nur 15 von 33 Visick 1. Am schlechtesten was das Ergebnis nach selektiv proximaler Vagotomie mit Pylorusbougierung, wo 4 von 9 Visick IV hatten. Dieses Verfahren wurde aufgegeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Delaney P (1978) Preoperative grading of pyloric stenosis: a long term clinical and radiological follow-up of patients with severe pyloric stenosis treated by highly selective vagotomy and dilatation of the stricture. Br J Surg 65:157–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn DC, Thomas WEG, Hunter JO (1981) Highly selective vagotomy and pyloric dilatation for duodenal ulcer with stenosis. Br J Surg 68:194–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaboulay M (1982) De la gastro-duodénostomie. Arch Pörov Chir 1:551

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston D, Lyndon PJ, Smith RB, Humphrey CS (1973) Highly selective vagotomy without a drainage procedure in the treatment of haemorrhage, perforation, and pyloric stenosis due to peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 50:790–797

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pringle R, Irving AD, Longrigg JN, Wisbey M (1983) Randomized trial of truncal vagotomy with either pyloroplasty or pyloric dilatation in the surgical management of chronic duodenal ulcer. Br J Surg 70:482–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Starlinger M, Skodler W, Kwasny O, Hofbauer F, Schiessel R (1984) Langzeitergebnisse der selektiv proximalen Vagotomie. Wien Klin Wochenschr 96:144–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Visick AH (1948) A study of the failure after gastrectomy. Am Coll Surg 23:266–284

    Google Scholar 

  8. White CM, Harding LK, Keighley MRB, Dorricott NJ, Alexander-Williams J (1978) Gastric emptying after treatment of stenosis secondary to duodenal ulceration by proximal gastric vagotomy and duodenoplasty or pyloric dilation. Gut 19:783–786

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwasny, O., Starlinger, M. & Schiessel, R. Die chirurgische Therapie des stenosierenden Ulcus duodeni —Ergebnis einer unkontrollierten Vergleichsstudie. Langenbecks Arch Chiv 368, 233–239 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263212

Key words

Navigation