Skip to main content
Log in

Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addressed the issue of how some urban neighborhoods maintain a relatively low level of crime despite their physical proximity and social similarity to high crime areas. The study explored differences in physical characteristics and various dimensions of the concept of territoriality in three pairs of neighborhoods in Atlanta, Georgia. Neighborhoods within pairs were adjacent and were matched on racial composition and economic status but had distinctly different crime levels. The results indicated that differences in physical characteristics distinguished between matched high and low crime neighborhoods to a far greater extent than did differences in the measures of territoriality. The flow of outsiders into and out of low crime neighborhoods was inhibited because land use was more homogeneously residential, there were fewer major arteries, and boundary streets were less traveled than was the case in high crime neighborhoods. There were relatively few differences in informal territorial control between high and low crime neighborhoods. Where differences existed, informal territorial control was more characteristic of high crime than of low crime neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumer, T.L., & Hunter, A.Street traffic, social integration, and fear of crime. Evanston, III.: Center for Urban Affairs, Northwestern University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, S.L. Urban crime patterns.American Sociological Review, 1965,30, 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordua, D.J. Juvenile delinquency and "Anomie": An attempt at replication.Social Problems, 1958–1959,6, 230–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, R.J. Continuity in delinquency research: A comparison of studies for Baltimore, Detroit, and Indianapolis.American Sociological Review, 1964,29, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrick, B. The environment and burglary victimization in a metropolitan suburb. Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, Georgia, November 16–20, 1977.

  • Fowler, F.J., Jr., McCalla, M.E., & Mangione, T.W.Reducing residential crime and fear: The Hartford neighborhood crime prevention program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, R.A.Design for safe neighborhoods. National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, September 1978.

  • Greenberg, S.W., Rohe, W.M., & Williams, J.R.Safe and secure neighborhoods: Physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods, (Draft Final Report). Washington, D.C.: Community Crime Prevention Division, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, April 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwaltney, M.K.Designing safe environments: II. Bibliography. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwaltney, M.K., & Yin, R.K.Designing safe environments: I. What is a feature. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. The loss of community: An empirical test through replication.American Sociological Review, 1975,40(5), 537–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. Symbols of incivility: Social disorder and fear of crime in urban neighborhoods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Dallas, Texas, November 1978.

  • Jacobs, J.The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S.The urban neighborhood: A sociological perspective. New York: Random House, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, B.Toward an understanding of juvenile delinquency. New York: Columbia University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota Crime Prevention Center. An analysis of the relationship between assaults and Moby Dick's Bar. Minneapolis, MN, 1978a.

  • Minnesota Crime Prevention Center and Division of Planning, Department of Planning and Economic Develpment of City of St. Paul. Neighborhood deterioration and the location of adult entertainment establishments in St. Paul. Minneapolis, MN, 1978b.

  • Newman, O.Defensible space. New York: Macmillan Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O., & Wayne, F.The private street system in St. Louis. Report to the National Science Foundation (unpublished). New York: Institute for Community Design Analysis, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, K. Juvenile delinquency and social areas.Social Problems, 1957–1958,5, 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the National Advisory Committee on Civil Disorders. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.

  • Reppetto, T.A.Residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, L. Delinquency and migration. Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations, January 1960.

  • Schmid, C. F. Urban crime areas: Part I.American Sociological Review, 1960, 25(4); 527–542. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, C. F. Urban crime areas: Part II.American Sociological Review, 1960,25(5); 655–678. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D.Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D.,Principles of criminology, 7th ed. New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D.The Social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. D.The Social order of the slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S.N. The defensibility of defensible space: A critical review and a synthetic framework for future research. In T. Hirshi & M. Gottfredson (Eds.),Understanding crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. N.Informal control in the urban residential environment: (Final Report). Washington, D.C.: Community Crime Prevention Division, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, March 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on a larger study funded by the Community Crime Prevention Division, National Institute of Justice (Grant No. 79-NI-AX-0080). This study was completed when the senior author was at the Research Triangle Institute. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Stephanie Greenberg, Social Systems Research and Evaluation Division, Denver Research Institute, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, S.W., Rohe, W.M. & Williams, J.R. Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Popul Environ 5, 141–165 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257054

Keywords

Navigation