Skip to main content
Log in

An underlying cause of measurement discrepancies in determinations of osmotic characteristics in plant cells and tissues

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is frequently observed that liquid-exchange methods of measuring tissue water potential,Ψ, yield estimates further from zero than those obtained with vapour exchange methods, and that a similar situation exists with respect to plasmolytic methods of measuring vacuolar osmotic pressure,π, compared with estimates from expressed sap methods. Although a number of factors may contribute to this phenomenon, it is suggested that the underlying reason is one of membrane leakiness, in the liquid exchange methods, to the solutes commonly employed. Although the amount of solute uptake may appear to be small during the period of the determinations, the effective osmotic pressure of the external solution is reduced if there is a net volume exchange of water and solute, instead of a simple water exchange. Thus the solution which appears to be in equilibrium with the tissue is, in fact, more concentrated than the true equilibrium solution leading to a spurious estimate of Ψ or π.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Barrs, H. D., 1964: Heat of respiration as a possible cause of error in the estimation by psychrometric methods of water potential in plant tissue. Nature203, 1136–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark, T. A., A. D. Greenwood, and J. W. Barker, 1936: Water relations and osmotic pressures of plant cells. New Phytol.35, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and D. Bexon, 1940: Water relations of plant cells, II New Phytol.39, 337–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyer, T. C., 1951: Experiments on imbibition and other factors concerned in the water relations of plant tissues. Amer. J. Bot.38, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, A. S., B. Currier, and C. R. Stocking, 1949: Water in the physiology of plants. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currier, H. B., 1944 a: Water relations of root cells ofBeta vulgaris. Amer. J. Bot.31, 378–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currier, H. B., 1944 b: Cryoscopy of small amounts of expressed tissue sap. Plant Physiol.19, 544–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainty, J., 1963: Water relations of plant cells. Adv. Bot. Res.1, 279–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and B. Z. Ginzburg, 1964: The reflection coefficient of plant cell membranes for certain solutes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta79, 129–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, E. C. M., 1935: Factors rendering the plasmolytic method inapplicable in the estimation of osmotic values of plant cells. Physiol. Plant.10, 553–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, D. F., and D. J. Carr, 1962: The role of cell wall water in the water relations of leaves. UNESCO Arid Zone Res.16, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1964: An examination of the refractometric method for determining the water potential of plant tissues. Annals of Botany28, 351–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, J. D., and P. J. Kramer, 1962: The measurement of water deficits in broadleaf plants. Protoplasma57, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katchalsky, A., and O. Kedem, 1962: Thermodynamics of flow processes in biological systems. Biophys. J.2, 53–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kedem, O., and A. Katchalsky, 1958: Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta27, 229–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1963: Permeability of composite membranes, Part I: Electric current, volume flow and flow of solute through membranes. Trans. Faraday Soc.59, 1918–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreeb, K., and M. Önal, 1961: Über die gravimetrische Methode zur Bestimmung der Saugspannung und das Problem des negativen Turgors. II. Mitteilung. Die Berücksichtigung von Atmungsverlusten während der Messungen. Planta56, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, T. G., and E. Phillis, 1939: Experiments on the extraction of sap from the vacuole of the leaf of the cotton plant and their bearing on the osmotic theory of water absorption by the cell. Ann. Bot. 3, 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mees, G. C., and P. E. Weatherley, 1957: The mechanism of water absorption by roots I. Preliminary studies on the effects of hydrostatic pressure gradients. Proc. Roy. Soc.147, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, F. V., 1955: The water relations of plant cells. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW80, 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. S., and A. M. Wallace, 1941: A comparison of two methods of determining the diffusion pressure deficit of potato tuber tissues. Amer. J. Bot.28, 838–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatyer, R. O., 1958: The measurements of diffusion pressure deficit in plants by a method of vapour equilibration. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.11, 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • - and E. Shmueli, 1966: Measurements of internal water status and transpiration. In: “Irrigation of Agricultural Lands” (in press).

  • Staverman, A. J., 1951: The theory of measurement of osmotic pressure. Rec. Trav. Chim.70, 344–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Overbeek, J., 1942: Water uptake by excised root systems of the tomato due to non-osmotic forces. Amer. J. Bot.29, 677–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherley, P. E., 1955: On the uptake of sucrose and water by floating leaf disks under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The New Phytologist54, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slatyer, R.O. An underlying cause of measurement discrepancies in determinations of osmotic characteristics in plant cells and tissues. Protoplasma 62, 34–43 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254630

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01254630

Keywords

Navigation