Skip to main content
Log in

Ambivalence in play and ritual

  • Other Voices
  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

Life is not breath, but action; to live is to make use of our organs, our senses, our faculties, every part of ourselves which gives us the feeling of our own existence.

Rousseau

Emile

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huizinga, J.Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London: Paladin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ehrman, J.Homo Ludens revisited. InGames, Play, and Literature. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diamond, S.In Search of the Primitive: A Critique of Civilization. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Radin, P.Primitive Man As Philosopher, New York: Dover, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Douglas, M.Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pullution and Taboo. London: Penguin, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eliade, M.The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callois, R.Man, Play, and Games. New York: Free Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eliade, M.Rites and Symbols of Initiation: The Mysteries of Birth and Rebirth, New York: Harper & Row, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freud, S. Hemmung, Symptom und Angst. Quoted in Walder, R., “The Psychoanalytic Theory of Play,”Pyschoanal. Q. 2: 215, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garvey, C.Play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erikson, E. Play and Actuality. In Maria Piers, (Ed),Play and Development, New York: Norton, 1972, p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erikson, E.Toys and Reasons: Stages in the Ritualization of Experience. New York: Norton, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace, A. F. C.,Religion: An Anthropological View, New York: Random House, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Genep, A.,The Rites of Passage, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Radin, P.The World of Primitive Man. New York: Abelard Schuman, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malinowski, B.,Magic, Science and Religion, and Other Essays. New York: Doubleday, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freud, S.A General Introduction to Psychanalysis. New York: Washington Square Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quoted in Brody, S. “Clinical manifestations of ambivalence,” Psychoanal. Q. 25: 505, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freud, S.Civilization and Its Discontents, New York: Norton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brown, N. O.,Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History, London: Sphere, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turner, V. W. Three symbols of passage in Ndembu circumcision ritual: an interpretation. In M. Gluckman, (Ed.)Essays on the Rituals of Social Relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bettleheim, B.Symbolic Wounds: Puberty Rites and the Envious Male. New York: Crowell Collier, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crumrine, N. R. Mediating roles in ritual symbolism: northwest Mexico and the Pacific Northwest.Anthropologica, 18 (2): 131–152, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubenstein, J. Ambivalence in play and ritual. Am J Psychoanal 40, 73–83 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01253542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01253542

Navigation