Skip to main content
Log in

Offspring allocation in structured populations with dimorphic males

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Many fig wasp species have dimorphic males. These males often mate in different localities; one typically disperses before mating whereas the other does not disperse. In 1979 a model was developed for offspring allocation in dimorphic fig wasps, but it assumed that females only lay a single egg per fig. This assumption is not realistic and precludes any effects local mate competition (LMC) may exert on morph abundance. I develop a model without these restrictions and show that the optimal proportions of each morph is determined by two parameters. Firstly, the proportion of the non-dispersing morph is affected by the mean number of females that oviposit in a patch. This effect is due to the negative correlation between LMC between brothers and the number of females that oviposit in a patch. Secondly, the proportions of both male morphs correlate with the expected proportion of females which will mate with each morph. The separation of the two parameters generalizes the model to any other species which is spatially structured and which has two male morphs or even two alternative mating strategies. A comparison of two models shows that parent—offspring conflict involving morph ratios will not have far reaching consequences. I test these models using the 1979 model's data and both models accurately predict the variation in morph ratios in six species of dimorphic fig wasps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulmer, M.G. and Taylor, P.D. (1980) Dispersal and the sex ratio.Nature 284 448–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A. (1985) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. II. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps.Evolution 39 949–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, S.A. (1986) The genetic value of sons and daughters.Heredity 56 351–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M. (1972) Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection.Am. Nat. 106 574–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios.Science 156 477–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in the social insects.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3 192–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. InSexual selection and reproductive competition in Insects (M.S. Blum and N.A. Blum, eds) pp. 167–220. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herre, E.A. (1985) Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps.Science 228 896–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefdt, R.J.C. (1989) Interactions between fig wasps and their host figs. MSc Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y. and Iwasa, I. (1980) A sex ratio theory for gregarious parasitoids.Res. Pop. Ecol. 22 366–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. (1988) Inclusive fitness models with two sexes.Theor. Pop. Biol. 34 145–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. (1993) Female-biased sex ratios under local mate competition: an experimental confirmation.Evol. Ecol. 7 306–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. and Bulmer, M.G. (1980) Local mate competition and the sex ratio.J. Theor. Biol. 86 409–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, S. (1991) Polymorphism and fighting in male fig wasps. PhD Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greeff, J.M. Offspring allocation in structured populations with dimorphic males. Evol Ecol 9, 550–558 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237836

Keywords

Navigation