Skip to main content
Log in

Aggregation and the maintenance of genetic diversity: An individual-based cellular model

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A cellular model, where each individual is explicitly defined, is used to describe a population of a mycophagous species ofDrosophila. Patches represent single fungal fruiting bodies which are only available as oviposition sites for a single fly generation. Standard competition equations are used to describe the interaction between larval genotypes at each patch. Dispersal of adults is obligatory and uses a simple model of patch choice to produce aggregated arrivals of adults at fresh patches. The degree to which aggregation of adults and eggs can promote coexistence of genotypes in a one-locus, two-allele system with dominance is explored. When both phenotypes (A- andaa) are aggregated, a polymorphism can be maintained for over 1000 generations even when the selective disadvantage of one phenotype (aa) is great. This model enhances the degree of polymorphism in a population, using aggregation. It does not preclude the operation of other methods which enhance the coexistence of genotypes. Therefore, it is acting to augment the degree of polymorphism maintained in species which exploit patchy and ephemeral habitats, including allDrosophila and a wide range of other organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, W.D. and Shorrocks, B. (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model.J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 461–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, E. (1976) Heterosis and the maintenance of enzyme polymorphism.Am. Nat.,110, 823–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J.A. (1972) An experimental study of the cline of industrial melanism inBiston betularia (L.) (Lepidoptera) between urban Liverpool and rural North Wales.J. Anim. Ecol.,41, 209–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, F.B. (1975) Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population.Am. Nat. 109, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (1969) The evidence for apostatic selection.Heredity 24, 347–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (1979) The evolution of genetic diversity.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [B]205, 453–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C.A., Mani, G.S. and Wynne, G. (1985) Evolution in reverse: clean air and the peppered moth.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26, 189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins, H.N., Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1992) The spatial dynamics of host-parasitod systems.J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 735–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, G.A. (1986) Molecular drive in multigene families: how biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated.Trends Genet. 2, 159–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dytham, C. and Shorrocks, B. (1992) Selection, patches and genetic variation: a cellular automaton modellingDrosophila populations.Evol. Ecol. 6, 342–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellner, S. and Hairston, N.G. (1994) Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment.Am. Nat. 143, 403–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermentrout, G.B. and Edelstein—Keshet, L. (1993) Cellular automaton approaches to biological modelling.J. Theoret. Biol. 160, 97–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and Comins, H.N. (1976) Discrete time models for two-species competition.Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 202–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P., Comins, H.N. and May, R.M. (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics.Nature 353, 255–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, R.F., Bijlsma, R. and Dolman, A.J. (1985) Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favoured homozygote in each environment.Genet. Res. 45, 299–314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, R.J. and Majerus, E.N. (1987) The understanding of industrial melanism in the peppered moth (Biston betularia) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae).Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, A.R. (1988) Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resource.J. Theoret. Biol. 133, 345–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. (1983)The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreitman, M., Shorrocks, B. and Dytham, C. (1992) Genes and ecology: two alternative perspectives usingDrosophila. InGenes in ecology (R.J. Berryet al., eds)BES Symposium Vol.33, pp. 281–312. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. (1955) The stability of an equilibrium and the average fitness of a population.Am. Nat. 89, 281–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, M. (1967) ‘Mean crowding’J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, G.S. (1980) A theoretical study of morph ratio clines with special reference to melanism in moths.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [B]210, 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, G.S. (1982) A theoretical analysis of the morph frequency variation in the peppered moth over England and Wales.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 259–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. and Slatkin, M. (1973) The stability of predator—prey systems.Ecology 54, 384–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E. (1978) Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory.Theoret. Pop. Biol. 13, 121–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. (1954) An outline of the population dynamics of natural populations.Aust. J. Zool. 2, 9–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosewell, J., Shorrocks, B. and Edwards, K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: testing the assumptions. I. Aggregation.J. Anim. Ecol. 59, 977–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1982). The breeding sites of temperate woodlandDrosophila. InThe genetics and biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b, (M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson and J.N. Thompson Jr eds) pp. 385–428. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. (1990) Competition and selection in a patchy and ephemeral habitat: the implications for insect life-cycles. InInsect life cycles (F. Gilbert ed.) pp. 215–28, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and Charlesworth, P. (1980) The distribution and abundance of the British fungal-breedingDrosophila.Ecol. Ent. 5, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. and Rosewell, J. (1987) Spatial patchiness and community structure: coexistence and guild size of drosophilids on ephemeral resources. InOrganisation of communities: past and present (J.H.R. Gee and P.S. Giller, eds), pp. 29–51. Blackwell, Oxford; UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B., Rosewell, J., Edwards, K. and Atkinson, W.D. (1984) Interspecific competition is not a major organizing force in many insect communities.Nature 310, 310–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L.R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean.Nature,189, 732–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1968) Polymorphism, population size, and genetic load. InPopulation biology and evolution (R.C. Lewontin, ed.) pp. 87–108. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B. (1975) Hard and soft selection revisited.Evolution 29, 465–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dytham, C., Shorrocks, B. Aggregation and the maintenance of genetic diversity: An individual-based cellular model. Evol Ecol 9, 508–519 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237832

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237832

keywords

Navigation