Skip to main content
Log in

Computerized pattern recognition of EEG artifact

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Automated artifact classification of quantified EEG (QEEG) epochs from 9 males using linear discriminant analysis showed greater than 85% agreement with judges' opinions. These results were replicated (n=600 epochs for each sample). Testing the entire sample (n=5800) illustrated reliable eye artifact (94%) but reduced muscle artifact classification (70%) accuracy. Agreement was lowest in the case of more subtle forms of muscle artifact (i.e., low amplitude muscle), however, less than 4% of these were wrongly classified as non-artifact. Improved data collection techniques retaining high frequency energies are anticipated to improve muscle artifact recognition. Results indicate that low levels of artifact contamination would result when only those epochs classified as non-artifact were accepted for inclusion in further analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, J.S. Artifact processing (rejection and minimization) in EEG data processing. In F.H. Lopes da Silva, W. Storm van Leeuwen and A. Remond (Eds.), Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Revised Series, Volume 2, pp. 15–62). New York: Elsevier, 1986: 15–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortgens, C. and De Bruin, M.P. Removal of eye movement and ECG artifacts from the non-cephalic reference EEG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1983, 56: 90–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevins, A.S. Pattern recognition of human brain electrical potentials. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel., 1980, PAMI-2: 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, H. EEG data acquisition. Neuropsychobiology, 1987, 17: 77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, E.M., Weiner, R.D., Brenner, R.P. and Coppola, R. Topographic maps of brain electrical activity—pitfalls and precautions. Biological Psychiatry, 1988, 23: 628–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matousek, M. and Volavka, J. The subjective factor in the results of EEG frequency analysis. Activa. Nerv. Sup., 1967, 9: 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takarada, T., Alvarado, L.G., Nishida, F. and Nishino, M. Frequency analysis of the EMG power spectrum of the anterior temporal and masseter muscles in children and adults. Shoni-Shikagaku-Zasshi, 1989, 27(4): 884–894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg-Lensse, M.M.C., Brunia, C.H.M. and Blom, J.A. Correction of ocular artifacts in EEGs using an autoregressive model to describe the EEG: A pilot study. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 73: 72–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woestenburg, J.C., Verbaten, M.N. and Slangen, J.L. The removal of eye-movement artifact for the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biological Psychology, 1983, 16: 127–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacCrimmon, D.J., Durocher, G.J., Chan, R.W.Y. et al. Computerized pattern recognition of EEG artifact. Brain Topogr 6, 21–25 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234123

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234123

Key words

Navigation