Abstract
It is well known that private provision of a public good may lead to a higher supply than that in some Pareto optimal allocation. The traditional view attributes this “overprovision anomaly” to a specific kind of preferences. The present paper, however, shows that preferences do not play a decisive role. Assuming normality, overprovision will occur only if the distribution of income is extremely skewed and Pareto optimal allocations are not within the set of cost-share equilibria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergstrom, T. C., Blume, L., and Varian, H. (1986): “On the Private Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Public Economics 29: 25–49.
Bergstrom, T. C., Blume, L., and Varian, H. (1992): “Uniqueness of Nash Equilibrium in Private Provision of Public Goods: An Improved Proof.”Journal of Public Economics 49: 391–392.
Bergstrom, T. C., and Cornes, R. C. (1983): “Independence of Allocative Efficiency from Distribution in the Theory of Public Goods.”Econometricae 51: 1753–1765.
Buchanan, J. M., and Kafoglis, M. (1963): “A Note on Public Good Supply.”American Economic Review 53: 403–414.
Buchholz, W., and Konrad, K. A. (1995): “Strategic Transfers and Private Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Public Economics 57: 489–505.
Campbell, D. E., and Truchon, M. (1988): “Boundary Optima and the Theory of Public Goods Supply.”Journal of Public Economics 35: 241–249.
Cornes, R., and Sandler, T. (1996): “The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods.” 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press.
Diamond, P. A., and Mirrlees, J. A. (1973): “Aggregate Production with Consumption Externalities.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 1–24.
Foley, D. K. (1970). “Lindahl's Solution and the Core of an Economy with Public Goods.”Econometrica 38: 66–72.
Fraser, C. D. (1992): “The Uniqueness of Nash Equilibrium in the Private Provision of Public Goods: An Alternative Proof.”Journal of Public Economics 49: 389–390.
Itaya, J., de Meza, D., and Myles, J. A. (1997): “In Praise of Inequality: Public Good Provision and Income Distribution.”Economics Letters 57: 289–296.
Mas-Colell, A., and Silvestre, J. (1989): “Cost Share Equilibria: A Lindahlian Approach.”Journal of Economic Theory 47: 239–256.
Myles, G. D. (1995):Public Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Nett, L., and Peters, W. (1993): “The Uniqueness of the Subscription Equilibrium with Endogenous Labor Supply.”Economics Letters 42: 139–142.
Warr, P. G. (1983): “The Private Provision of a Pure Public Good is Independent of the Distribution of Income.”Economics Letters 13: 207–211.
Weber, S., and Wiesmeth, H. (1991): “The Equivalence of Core and Cost Share Equilibria in an Economy with a Public Good.”Journal of Economic Theory 54: 180–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchholz, W., Peters, W. The overprovision anomaly of private public good supply. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 74, 63–78 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231216
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231216
Keywords
- overprovision of public goods
- subscription equilibria
- Warr neutrality
- cost-share equilibria
- Lindahl prices