Skip to main content
Log in

Natural monopoly and differential pricing

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under uniform pricing a monopolist cannot make a positive profit in equilibrium. I analyze how differential pricing can be exploited by a natural monopolist to deter entry when entry is costless. In a two-stage game with price competition before quantity competition I show that the incumbent firm can deter entry and make a positive profit in equilibrium. The incumbent sets two different prices, the low price to deter entry and the high price to generate profit. Entry is not possible because of scale effects. If dumping is allowed for all firms no positive profits are realizable, but welfare is reduced. I show that for some parameter values the incumbent is forced to engage in a stunt (i.e., set a negative low price) to keep entrants out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W., Panzar, J., and Willig, R. (1982):Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassy, J. P. (1986): “On the Existence of Bertrand-Edgeworth Equilibria with Differentiated Commodities”. InContributions to Mathematical Economics, in honor of Gérard Debreu, edited by W. Hildenbrand and A. Mas-Colell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam, R. R. (1989): “Optimal Policies for Natural Monopolies”. InHandbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canoy, M. (1993): “Bertrand Meets the Fox and the Owl.” PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Chander, P., and Leruth, L. (1989): “The Optimal Product Mix for a Monopolist in the Presence of Congestion Effects”.International Journal of Industrial Organization 7: 437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1988): “On the Strategic Importance of Prices versus Quantities”.Rand Journal of Economics 19: 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. B., Leland, H. E., and Sibley, D. S. (1984): “Optimal Nonuniform Prices”.Review of Economic Studies 51: 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, D. M. (1991): “Nonuniform Bertrand Competition”.Econometrica 60: 1293–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, J. (1989): “Determinations of Firm and Industry Structure”. InHandbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. (1984): “Sustainable Positive Profit Multiple-price Strategies in Contestable Markets”.Journal of Economic Theory 32: 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., and Ross, D. (1990):Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, W. (1982):The Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thisse, J.-F. and Vives, X. (1988): “On the Strategic Choice of Spatial Price Policy”.American Economic Review 78: 122–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988).The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cayseele, P. (1991): “Consumer Rationing and the Possibility of Intertemporal Price Discrimination”.European Economic Review 35: 1473–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1989): “Price Discrimination”. InHandbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canoy, M. Natural monopoly and differential pricing. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 59, 287–309 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227594

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227594

Keywords

Navigation