Conclusions
-
1.
Equations were formulated for the field within a cylindrical ferromagnetic test-piece in a weak alternating field (Rayleigh region).
-
2.
Solution of this equation formed the basis of formulae for calculating the amplitude and phase of the secondary emf first and third harmonics.
-
3.
Analysis of the formulae shows that the third E2 harmonic is the most suitable for controlling heat treatment of ferrous metal components. This theoretical conclusion was confirmed by experiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. Shkol'nik, “An electronic hardness tester,” V pomoshch radiolyubitelyu,11, 32–42, 1961.
A. I. Kuznetsov and M. N. Mikheev, FMM,17, no. 2, 201–207, 1964.
R. E. Ershov, Izv. vuzov SSSR, Fizika, no. 3, 122, 1961.
F. Förster Zs. f. Metallkunde,45, 166, 1954.
N. A. Bondarenko, “Measurement of nonmagnetic layer thickness in bimetallic tubes,” Conference on Automation and Control in the Tube Industry: Abstracts of Reports and Communications [in Russian], Dnepropetrovsk, 1963.
R. Bozorth, Ferromagnetism [Russian translation], 392, 292, 396, IIL, Moscow, 1951.
The Modern Cathode-ray Oscillograph [in Russian], part 2, 46, Moscow, 1951.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
In conclusion, I have pleasure in expressing my gratitude to Professor Yu. L. Rabinovich of Moscow State University for his valuable advice on mathematical points.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ershov, R.E. Checking heat treatment of ferromagnetic components by the eddy current method. Soviet Physics Journal 9, 30–35 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206488
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206488