Summary
In this study, we determined the influence of dipole orientation, dipole location, and number of recording sites on the precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor. We compared localization from referential EEG (R-EEG), scalp current density EEG (SCD-EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Dipole orientation had a small influence on the precision of dipole localization for R-EEG and SCD-EEG. Dipole location relative to the recording sites, dipole depth, and number of recording channels strongly influenced the precision of dipole localization. Assuming equal signal to noise conditions for each recording method, MEG and SCD-EEG had a similar precision for dipole localization of a single tangential dipole source and both methods were more precise than R-EEG. However, SCD-EEG was inferior to MEG for distinguishing a single tangential current source from a pair of deeper radial current sources. In summary, these results suggest that the MEG will be most useful for localization of multiple simultaneous dipole sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afifi, A.A. and Azen, S.P. Statistical Analysis A Computer Oriented Approach. Academic Press, New York, 1979: 288–301.
Balish, M., Sato, S., Connaughton, P., and Kufta, C. Localization of implanted dipoles by magnetoencephalography. Neurology, 1991, 41: 1072–1076.
Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J.G., and Schomer, D.L. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol. 1990, 28: 811–817.
Cuffin, B.N. and Cohen, D. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1979, 47: 132–146.
Hari, R., Hamalainen, M., Ilomoniemi, R. and Lounasmaa, O.V. MEG versus EEG localization test. Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30: 222–3.
Hochstadt, H. Special functions of mathematical physics, Holt Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1966: 29–36.
Hosek, R.S., Sances, A., Jodat, R.W., and Larson, S.J. Contributions of intracerebral currents to EEG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1978, 25: 405–413.
Menninghaus, E., Lutkenhoner, B., and Gonzalez, S.L. Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: Realistic versus spherical model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1994, 41: 986–989.
Mosher, J.C., Spencer, M.E., Leahy, R.M., and Lewis, P.S. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 86: 303–321.
Nunez, P.L. Electric Fields of the Brain. Oxford University Press, New York, 1981: 82–83.
Nunez, P.L. Localization of Brain Activity with Electroencephalography. In: Sato, S. (Ed.), Advances in Neurology Volume 54 Magnetoencephalography. Raven Press, New York, 1990: 39–66.
Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., and Pernier, J. Scalp current density mapping: Value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1987, 34: 283–288.
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. Numerical recipes. The art of scientific computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987: 125 & 180–183.
Romani, G.L. and Pizzella, V. Localization of Brain Activity with Magnetoencephalography. In: Sato, S. (Ed.), Advances in Neurology Volume 54 Magnetoencephalography. Raven Press, New York, 1990: 39–66.
Roth, B.J., Balish, M., Gorbach, A., and Sato, S. How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head?, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 87: 175–184.
Sharbrough, F., Chantrian, G., Lesser, R.P., Luders, H., Nuwer, M., and Picton, T.W. Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature, J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, 11: 111–113.
Smith, D.B., Sidman, R.D., Flanigin, H.F., Henke, J., and Labiner, D. A reliable method for localizing deep intracranial sources of the EEG. Neurology, 1985, 35: 1702–1707.
Sutherling, W.W., Levesque, M.F., Crandal, P.H., and Barth, D.S. Localization of partial epilepsy using magnetic and electric measurements. Epilepsia, 1991, 32: S29-S40.
Williamson, S.J. MEG versus EEG localization test, Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30: 222.
Wood, C.C., Cohen, D., Cufftn, N.B., Yarita, M., and Truett, A. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: Identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings, Science, 1985, 227: 1051–1053.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murro, A.M., Smith, J.R., King, D.W. et al. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: A comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods. Brain Topogr 8, 119–125 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199775
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199775