Skip to main content
Log in

An expert system for field inspection of concrete dams: Part 2, artificial intelligence issues

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The preliminary development and final description of the engineering knowledge and reasoning pertaining to an expert system to assist during the field inspection of existing concrete gravity dams have been described in Refs. [1] and [2]. The purpose of this paper is to describe the artificial intelligence (AI) issues that were raised during the construction of the expert system. The first part of the paper deals with techniques used to identify the engineering knowledge, using heuristic classification and/or construction as in the expert system approach and causal and/or teleological reasoning as in the qualitative physics approach. The second part of the paper covers specific issues related to knowledge acquisition. The last part addresses various issues of knowledge representation as they are directly relevant to this expert system. Examples relative to AI concepts have been presented in Ref. [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franck, B. M.; Krauthammer, T. (1988) Development of an expert system for preliminary risk assessment of existing concrete dams. Eng. Comput. 3, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franck, B. M.; Krauthammer, T. (1989) An expert system for field inspection of concrete dams: Part 1, engineering knowledge. Eng. Comput. 5, 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blockley, D. (1987) Uncertain inference in knowledge-based systems, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 113(4), 467–481

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R.; Lenat, D. B. (1982) Knowledge-based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newell, A. (1981) The knowledge level. AI Magazine 2(2), 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Waterman, D.A. (1986) A guide to EXPERT SYSTEMS. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Kleer, J.; Brown, J.S. (1986) Theories of causal reasoning. AI J. 29, 33–61

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clancey, W.J. (1984) Classification problem solving. Report No. STAN-CS-84-1018, Stanford University, CA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clancey, W.J. (1985) Heuristic classification. J AI 27(2), 289–350

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes-Roth, F.; Waterman, D.A.; Lenat, D.B. (1983) Building expert systems. In: The Teknowledge Series in Knowledge Engineering. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, R. (1984) Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior. AI J. 24, 347–410

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blockley, D. (1980) The nature of structural design and safety, New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, J.T.P. (1985) Safety and reliability of existing structures. Pitman Publishing

  14. De Kleer, J. (1984) How circuits work. AI J. 24, 205–280

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen, R.B.; Carlson, R.W.; Wilson, E.L. (1973) Diagnosis and treatment of dams. In: Transactions of the Madrid Congress sponsored by the International Commission Of Large Dams

  16. Franck, B.M. (1987) Preliminary safety and risk assessment for existing hydraulic structures—An expert system approach. Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School, University of Minnesota

  17. Freudenthal, A.M. (1947) The safety of structures. ASCE Trans. 112, 125–180

    Google Scholar 

  18. American Society of Civil Engineers, The Committee on the Failures and Accidents to Large Dams of the U.S. Committee on Large Dams. (1975) Lessons from dams incidents—USA. Published jointly by ASCE/USCOLD

  19. American Society of Civil Engineers, Hydraulic Structures Committee of the Hydraulics Division. (1986) Lessons learned from design, construction, and performance of hydraulic structures

  20. National Research Council, Safety of existing dams—Evaluation and improvement. (1983) Committee on the Safety of Existing Dams, Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Engineering and Technology Systems, National Research Council, National Academy Press

  21. Kahn, G.; Nowlan, S.; McDermott, J. (1985) Strategies for knowledge acquisition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. PAMI-7(5), 511–522

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clancey, W.J. (1984) Knowledge acquisition for classification expert systems. In: Proceedings ACM 1984 Annual Conference: The Fifth Generation Challenge (Ed. R.L. Muller). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuipers, B. (1984) Common sense reasoning about causality: Deriving behavior from structure. AI J. 24, 169–203

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson, P.E. (1984) The expert mind: A new challenge for the information scientist. In: BEYOND PRODUCTIVITY: Information Systems Development for Organizational Effectiveness (Ed. M.A. Bemelmans, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 367–386

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fink, P.K.; Lusth, J.C.; Duran, J.W. (1985) A general expert system design for diagnostic problem solving. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. PAMI-7(5), 553–560

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rich, E. (1983) Artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill series on Artificial Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  27. Texas Instruments Incorporated (1986) PERSONAL CONSULTANT PLUS, Version 2.1, Vols. 1 & 2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franck, B.M., Krauthammer, T. An expert system for field inspection of concrete dams: Part 2, artificial intelligence issues. Engineering with Computers 5, 119–131 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199074

Keywords

Navigation