Skip to main content
Log in

Nondefinability of projectivity in lattice varieties

  • Published:
algebra universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship of projectivity between two quotients in a lattice is shown not to be first-order definable, in any nondistributive lattice variety. The proof depends on a special kind of subdirect power construction that shows the existence of arbitrarily long non-shortenable projectivities in such a variety. A similar result holds for weak projectivities. Even so, weak projectivities of bounded length do suffice to determine principal congruences in any variety generated by a finite lattice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. A. Baker,Primitive satisfaction and equational problems for lattices and other algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.290 (1974), 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —,Finite equational bases for finite algebras in a congruence-distributive equational class, Advances in Math.24 (1977), 207–243.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. A. Baker andA. F. Pixley,Polynomial interpolation and the Chinese remainder theorem for algebraic systems, Math. Z.143 (1974), 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. T.Baldwin and J.Berman,Definable principal congruence relations: kith and kin, preprint.

  5. G. M. Bergman,The existence of subalgebras of direct products with prescribed d-fold projections, Algebra Universalis7 (1977), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Birkhoff,Lattice Theory, 3rd ed., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. P. Dilworth,The structure of relatively complemented lattices, Ann. of Math. (2)51 (1950), 348–359.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. P. Dilworth andP. Crawley,Algebraic Theory of Lattices, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Fried, G. Grätzer, andR. Quackenbush,Uniform congruence schemes, Algebra Universalia10 (1980), 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Grätzer,General Lattice Theory, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —,Universal Algebra, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Herrmann,Weak projective radius and finite equational bases for classes of lattices, Algebra Universalis3 (1973), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Jonsson,Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive, Math. Scand.21 (1967), 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —,Congruence varieties, Algebra Universalis10 (1980), 355–394.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. McKenzie,Para primal varieties: a study of finite axiomatizability and definable principal congruences in locally finite varieties, Algebra Universalis8 (1978), 336–348.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Tarski,Equational logic and equational theories of algebras, pp. 275–288 in: H. A. Schmidt et al., Contributions to Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. F. Taylor,Equational Logic, Houston J. Math., Survey 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Wille,Primitive subsets of lattices, Algebra Universalis2 (1972), 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —,On free modular lattices generated by finite chains, Algebra Universalis3 (1973), 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Garrett Birkhoff

Author's research was supported in part by NSF Grant MCS 81-02519.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, K.A. Nondefinability of projectivity in lattice varieties. Algebra Universalis 17, 267–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194536

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194536

Keywords

Navigation