Skip to main content
Log in

Perception of complex signals by unrestrained cats

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of cats to discriminate modulation parameters of linearly amplitude and frequency-modulated signals was investigated under conditions of free behavior of the animals. The maximum variations of the amplitude and frequency of the modulated signals for which the probability of discrimination is equal to the threshold (0.75) are 1.6 dB and 150 Hz for a carrier frequency of 2.5 kHz. Replacement of one type of modulation by the other in those cases when stimuli with supraliminal values of the modulation parameters (15 dB and 1 kHz) leads to random selection during discrimination of these signals by the animals. In the case of an analogous replacement of the type of modulation for signals with threshold values of the modulation parameters, the probability of discrimination becomes significant (p>0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. A. V. Baru, Recognition of Sound Signals and Auditory Centers [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. A. Vartanyan, Auditory Analysis of Complex Sounds [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. A. Vartanyan and T. V. Chernigovskaya, “Effect of parameters of acoustic stimulation on human evaluation of the change in distance from a sound source,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,66, No. 1, 101–108 (1980).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. I. A. Vartanyan, A. S. Rozenblyum, T. V. Chernigovskaya, and O. G. Pakhova, “Evaluation of complex signals by the auditory system,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,7, No. 6, 1071–1081 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. A. Vartanyan, “Auditory perception under conditions of realization of speech activity,” Sensorn. Sis.,1, No. 2, 205–212 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. A. Vartanyan, “Criteria for evaluating decision making when perceiving complex acoustic signals,” Sens. Sis.,2, No. 1, 67–72 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. V. Gershuni, B. V. Bogdanov, and O. Yu. Vakarchuk, “Investigation of human perception of the orienting long-range sound communication signal of monkeys (Cebus capucinus),” Fiziol. Cheloveka,3, No. 6, 1090–1096 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. V. Gershuni, B. V. Bogdanov, and O. Yu. Vakarchuk, “Characteristics of human perception of the orienting sound signal of monkeys (Cebus capucinus) with artificially altered temporal parameters,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,4, No. 2, 195–201 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. V. Kozhevnikova, “Some characteristics of human perception of an approaching sound source,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,66, No. 1, 109–118 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. V. Koshevnikova, “Differential thresholds of the rate of approach of a sound source,” in: Abstracts of Papers of the Tenth All-Union Acoustics Conference [in Russian], Moscow (1983), pp. 50–51.

  11. E. V. Kozhevnikova, “Human evaluation of the rate of approach of a sound source,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,11, No. 3, 368–373 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. E. V. Kozhevnikova, Human Perception of Signals Modeling the Approach and Recession of a Sound Source, Candidate's Dissertation Abstract, Leningrad (1987).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 1194–1199, September, 1989.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalmykova, I.V. Perception of complex signals by unrestrained cats. Neurosci Behav Physiol 20, 383–388 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192340

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192340

Key words

Navigation