Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of Sound Signals with Rippled Spectra in the Presence of Additional Signals

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Discrimination of sound signals (test and reference) with rippled spectrum structure was studied in conditions in which an additional signal was superimposed on the test and reference signals. The ripple phase in the test signal was inverted every 400 msec. The reference signals had either a rippled spectrum (with the same ripple density as the test signal but without alterNation of ripple phase) or a spectrum with an unresolvable ripple structure. The additional signal had the same spectral band and level as the test and reference signals and had either a flat spectrum or a rippled spectrum with ripple density 2–7 cycles/octave. With the rippled reference signal, ripple density resolution was 8.7 cycles/octave in controls (without superimposition of the additional signal), 8.5 cycles/octave with the flat additional signal, and 8.6–9.2 cycles/ octave with an additional signal with ripple density 2–7 cycles/octave; differences in these values from control were not statistically significant. With the reference signal with an unresolvable spectral structure, ripple density resolution in the test signal was 51.0 cycles/octave in controls, 16.7 cycles/octave with the flat additional signal, and 11.0–11.1 cycles/octave with the additional signal with ripple density 2–7 cycles/ octave; the differences of all values from controls were statistically significant. It follows from these data that superimposition of the additional signal induced effects linked with the spectral pattern of the additional signal, these effects being different for the spectral and temporal mechanisms of frequency analysis involved in signal discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. S., Nelson, D. A., Kreft, H., et al., “Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 364–375 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. S., Oxenham, A. J., Nelson, P. B., and Nelson, D. A., “Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination on cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 132, 3925–3934 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, B. A., Turner, C. W., and Behrens, A., “Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118, 1111–1121 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H., “Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 49, 467–477 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milekhina, O. N., Nechaev, D. I., and Supin, A. Ya., “Estimation of frequency resolving power of human hearing by different methods: Roles of sensory and cognitive factors,” Hum. Physiol., 44, 123–130 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechaev, D. I., Milekhina, O. N., and Supin, A. Ya., “Estimates of ripple- density resolution based on the discrimination from rippled and nonrippled reference signals,” Trends Hearing, 23, 1–9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechaev, D. I. and Supin, A. Ya., “Hearing sensitivity to shifts of rippled-spectrum patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 134, 2913–2922 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R. D., “Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli,” J.Acoust. Soc. Am., 59, 640–654 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Supin, A. Ya., Milekhina, O. N., and Nechaev, D. I., “Rippled depth thresholds: Estimates obtained by discrimination from rippled and non-rippled reference signals,” Acta. Acust. United Acust., 105, 1198–1205 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supin, A. Y., Popov, V. V., Milekhina, O. N., and Tarakanov, M. B., “Frequency resolving power measured by rippled noise,” Hear. Res., 78, 31–40 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supin, A. Y., Popov, V. V., Milekhina, O. N., and Tarakanov, M. B., “Frequency- temporal resolution of hearing measured by rippled noise,” Hear. Res., 108, 17–27 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supin, A. Y., Popov, V. V., Milekhina, O. N., and Tarakanov, M. B., “Ripple density resolution for various rippled-noise patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 2042–2050 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supin, A. Y., Popov, V. V., Milekhina, O. N., and Tarakanov, M. B., “Ripple depth and density resolution in rippled noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 2800–2804 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, W. A., Patterson, R. D., and Sheft, S., “A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99, 1066–1078 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ya. Supin.

Additional information

Translated from Sensornye Sistemy, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 228–235, July–August, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomozova, M.S., Nechaev, D.I., Milekhina, O.N. et al. Discrimination of Sound Signals with Rippled Spectra in the Presence of Additional Signals. Neurosci Behav Physi 52, 158–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-022-01216-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-022-01216-4

Keywords

Navigation