Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of cognitive self-statements during marital problem solving: A comparison of two methods

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty maritally distressed couples (DC) and 20 nondistressed couples (NDC) were recruited and asked to undertake 10 minutes of problem-solving discussions, which were videotaped. Each individual partner's cognitive self-statements during the interaction were assessed using two methods: videoassisted recall (VR) and thought listing (TL). Reported cognitions from each method were content-analyzed and classified into five categories: partnerreferent positive, partner-referent negative, self-referent positive, self-referent negative, and other. Proportions of reported cognitions falling into each category were analyzed in two separate two-way MANOVAs (marital distress/nondistress ×sex) for the VR and TL measures. Results of each MANOVA indicated a highly significant effect of marital distress on cognitions, and a significant effect of sex on the VR but not the TL measure. Discriminant analyses showed that the VR and TL methods both discriminated between DC and NDC groups. Post hoc univariate ANOVAs indicated that DC had significantly higher proportions of negative partner-referent cognitions, and lower proportions of positive partner-referent cognitions, than NDC while problem solving. The relative merits of each cognitive assessment method, and their potential use in increasing marital therapy effectiveness, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., & Lester, G. W. (1986). The usefulness of cognitive restructuring as an adjunct to behavioral marital therapy.Behavior Therapy, 17 385–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berley, R. A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1984). Causal attributions in intimate relationships: Toward a model of cognitive behavioral marital therapy. In P. Kendall (Ed.),Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 3, pp. 1–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, J. E., & O'Leary, K. D. (1986). Contributions of affect, attritudes, and behavior to marital satisfaction.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54 514–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessments: The thought listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.),Cognitive assessment (pp. 388–438). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camper, D. M., Jacobson, N. S., Holzworth-Munroe, A., & Schnaling, H. B. (1988). Causal attributions for interactional behaviors in married couples.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton, A. A., & Daniel, A. E. (1976).The individual in the making. Sydney: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J. (1982). Attributional style and negative problem solving in marriage.Family Relations, 31 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 715–720.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L., & Fleming, B. (1987). The role of cognitive appraisal in self-reports of marital communication.Behavior Therapy, 18 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F., & O'Leary, K. D. (1985). Causal inferences for spouse behavior in maritally distressed and nondistressed couples.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Markman, M. R. (1983). Observational biases in spouse observation: Toward a cognitive/behavioral model of marriage.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 450–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genest, G., & Turk, D. C. (1981). Think aloud approaches to cognitive assessment. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.),Cognitive assessment (pp. 233–269). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1986). Assessing the role of emotion in marriage.Behavioral Assessment, 8 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., & Bemis, K. M. (1981). Self report and the assessment of cognitive functions. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.),Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (2nd ed., pp. 125–174). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1985). Causal attributions of married couples: When do they search for causes? What do they conclude when they do?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 1398–1412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holzworth-Munroe, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (in press). Toward a methodology for coding spontaneous causal attributions: Preliminary results with married couples.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

  • Jacobson, N. S., McDonald, D. W., Follette, W. C., & Berley, R. A. (1985). Attributional process-G. (1984). Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: A re-analysis of outcome data.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979).Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., McDonald, D. W., Follete, W. C., & Berley, R. A. (1985). Attributional processes in distressed and nondistressed married couples.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Moore, D. (1981). Spouses as observers of events in their relationship.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 269–277.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C. (1983). Methodology and cognitive-behavioral assessment.Behavioral Psychotherapy, 11 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Methods in the measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 85–118). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short-term marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity.Journal of Marriage and Family Living, 21 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G. (1983). An interactional model for the behavioral assessment of marital relationships.Behavioral Assessment, 5 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., & Jacobson, N. S. (1981). Assessment of marital dysfunction. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.),Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (2nd ed., pp. 389–426). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977).Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R., & Halford, W. K. (in press). Situational variables and marital interaction.Behavior Change.

  • Schindler, L., & Volmer, M. (1984). Cognitive perspectives in behavioral marital therapy: Some proposals for bridging theory, research and practice. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.),Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 309–324). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. M., & Garmoni, G. L. (1986). Cognitive assessment: A multibehavior-multimethod-multiperspective method.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 8 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical package for the social sciences-X (2nd ed.). (1986). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Weiss, R. L. (1984). Cognitive and behavioral measures of marital interaction. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.),Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 337–355). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank Robyn Bishop, Craig Davis, Peter Dunne, Joy Hallam, and Brian Bishop for their valued help in conducting this study, and Mark Dadds and three anonymous reviewers for making constructive suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This study was supported in part by Grant 85002 from the Behavior Research and Therapy Centre, University of Queensland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halford, W.K., Sanders, M.R. Assessment of cognitive self-statements during marital problem solving: A comparison of two methods. Cogn Ther Res 12, 515–530 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173417

Key words

Navigation