Abstract
Let A ⊂R be commutative integral domains with identity. We say A is a retract of R when there exists a ring homomorphism τ: R→A such that τ|A=idA. We Prove two theorems: Theorem 3.1 says when A is a retract of R via τ, with Kernel (τ)= =t·R≠ (O), then t is transcendental over A and if A is “sub-inert” in R, then R∩K(t)=A[t], where K is the quotient field of A. This theorem with the hypotheses strengthened to A being a “2-valuation algebra” of R and the transcendence degree of R over A equal to one, gives Theorem 4.1, which now says R=A[t]. Given the other hypotheses of Theorem 4.1, A being a “2-valuation algebra” of R is equivalent to the existence of a valuation ring V of L, the quotient field of R, such that V∩R=A. Some counterexamples are given and some variations on the hypotheses of Theorem 4.1 are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
N. BOURBAKI: Commutative Algebra, Hermann, 1972.
C. CHEVALLEY: Algebraic Functions of one Variable, AMS, 1950.
J. DAVID: On the Endomorphisms of a Polynomial Ring, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, to appear.
R. GILMER: An Embedding Theorem for H C F-Rings, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (1970) 68, 583–587.
N. Jacobson: Lectures in abstract Algebra, Vol. III, Van Nostrand, 1964.
D. KIRBY: Integral Dependence and Valuation Algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc. (1970) (3) 20, 76–100.
M. NAGATA: Local Rings. Interscience, number 13 (1962).
P. SAMUEL: La Notion de Place dans un Anneau. Bull. Soc. Math. France (1957) 85, 123–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
David, J.E. On a retract of an integral domain. Manuscripta Math 19, 245–259 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01170774
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01170774