Abstract
In cats anesthetized with chloralose and pentobarbital and immobilized with D-tubocurarine activity of 423 pericruciate cortical neurons was recorded (342 extra-and 81 intracellularly); 78 neurons had spontaneous activity. Stimulation of the pyramidal tract evoked antidromic action potentials in the pyramidal neurons with a latent period of 0.5–16.0 msec. Recurrent and lateral PSPs also developed both in pyramidal and in unidentified neurons in all layers of the cortex; IPSPs were recorded in 46.7% of neurons, EPSPs in 21.0%, mixed reponses in 26.0%, and no visible changes were found in 6.3%. The latent period of the IPSPs was 1.5–14.0 msec, their amplitude 1.3–37.0 mV, their rise time from 4 to 18 msec, and their duration 18–120 msec (sometimes up to 250–500 msec). In 30% of cases in which IPSPs appeared, their course was divided into two phases: fast (duration 10–20 msec) and slow. EPSPs developed after a latent period of 2.6–29.0 msec; their amplitude was 1.0–7.8 mV and their duration from 30.0 to 50.0 msec. In 51.2%of spontaneously active neurons the antidromic volley inhibited their activity in the course of 200–400 msec, in 19.5% it stimulated their activity, in 7.4% it had a mixed effect, and in 21.9% no visible change took place in their activity. The role and participation of axon collaterals of pyramidal neurons and of the interneuronal system in the formation of these processes are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
D. P. Artemenko and T. M. Mamonets, “Unit responses of the posterior suprasylvian gyrus of the cat to various stimuli,” Neirofiziologiya,4, 378 (1972).
F. N. Serkov and E. Sh. Yanovskii, “Postsynaptic potentials of neurons of the cat auditory cortex,” Neirofiziologiya,3, 339 (1971).
V. M. Storozhuk, “Spontaneous unit activity of the somatosensory cortex and its modification by peripheral stimulation,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,52, 1169 (1966).
V. M. Storozhuk, “Unit activity of the primary somatosensory projection cortex during the primary response,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,18, 469 (1968).
V. M. Storozhuk, “Excitatory effects of recurrent collaterals of pyramidal tract neurons,” Neiro-fiziologiya,2, 123 (1971).
V. M. Storozhuk and T. B. Gurova, “Unit responses of somatosensory cortex to direct electrical stimulation,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,52, 1289 (1966).
V. M. Shaban, “Unit responses of the anterior part of the suprasylvian gyrus to peripheral stimuli of different modalities,” Neirofiziologiya,4, 368 (1972).
J. C. Eccles, Inhibitory Pathways of the Central Nervous System [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1971).
S. A. Andersson, “Intracellular postsynaptic potentials in the somatosensory cortex of the cat,” Nature,250, 297 (1965).
D. M. Armstrong, “Synaptic excitation and inhibition of Betz cells by antidromic pyramidal volley,” J. Physiol. (London),178, 37P (1965).
H. Asanuma and V. B. Brooks, “Recurrent cortical effects following stimulation of internal capsule,” Arch. Ital. Biol.,103, 220 (1965).
D. H. Atkinson, J. J. Seguin, and M. Wiesendanger, “Organization of corticofugal neurones in somato-sensory area II of the cat,” J. Physiol. (London),236, 663 (1974).
V. B. Brooks and H. Asanuma, “Recurrent cortical effects following stimulation of internal capsule,” Arch. Ital. Biol.,103, 247 (1965).
J. Calma and A. Arduini, “Spontaneous and induced activity in pyramidal units,” J. Neurophysiol.,17, 321 (1954).
K. Endo and M. Araki, “Two components of antidromic IPSPs in the pyramidal tract cells,” Brain Res.,39, 510 (1972).
D. R. Humprey, “Re-analysis of the antidromic cortical response. II. On the contribution of cell discharge and PSPs to the evoked potentials,” Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,25, 421 (1968).
S. J. Jabbur and A. L. Towe, “Analysis of the antidromic cortical response following stimulation of the medullary pyramids,” J. Physiol. (London),155, 148 (1961).
K. Krnjevic, M. Randic, and D. W. Straughan, “An inhibitory process in the cerebral cortex,” J. Physiol. (London),184, 16 (1966).
F. E. Leblanc and J. P. Cordeau, “Modulation of pyramidal tract cell activity by ventro-lateral thalamus regions. Its possible role in tremorogenic mechanism,” Brain Res.,14, 255 (1969).
H. D. Patton and V. E. Amassian, “The pyramidal tract: its excitation and function,” Handbook of Physiology, Section I, Neurophysiology, Vol. 2, Washington (1960).
C. G. Phillips, “Intracellular records from Betz cells in the cat,” Quart. J. Exp. Physiol.,43, 58 (1956).
C. G. Phillips, “Action of antidromic pyramidal volleys on single Betz cells in the cat,” Quart. J. Exp. Physiol.,44, 1 (1959).
E. Reinoso-Suarez, “Topographischer Hirnatlas der Katze, Darmstadt (1961).
C. Stefanis and H. Jasper, “Intracellular microelectrode studies of antidromic responses in cortical pyramidal tract neurons,” J. Neurophysiol.,27, 828 (1964).
C. Stefanis and H. Jasper, “Recurrent collateral inhibition in pyramidal tract neurone” J. Neurophysiol.,27, 855 (1964).
M. Steriade, P. Wyzinski, and V. Apostol, “Differential synaptic reactivity of simple and complex pyramidal tract neurons of various levels of vigilance,” Exp. Brain Res.,17, 87 (1973).
J. Szentagothai, “The synapses of short local neurons in the cerebral cortex,” Symp. Biol. Hung.,5, 251 (1965).
K. Takahashi, “Slow and fast groups of pyramidal tract cells and their respective membrane properties,” J. Neurophysiol.,28, 908 (1965).
K. Takahashi, K. Kubota, and M. Uno, “Recurrent facilitation in cat pyramidal tract cells,” J. Neurophysiol.,30, 22 (1967).
A. L. Towe and C. F. Tyner, “Cortical circuitry underlying the mixed receptive fields of certain pyramidal tract neurons,” Exptl. Neurol.,31, 239 (1971).
N. Tsukahara, D. R. G. Fuller and V. B. Brooks, “Collateral pyramidal influences on the cortico-rubrospinal system,” J. Neurophysiol.,31, 467 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 346–355, July–August, 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zadorozhnyi, A.G., Vasechko, T.V. Synaptic processes in pericruciate cortical neurons evoked by pyramidal tract stimulation in cats. Neurosci Behav Physiol 7, 82–88 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01148755
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01148755