Skip to main content
Log in

Mixture equations of state: Composition dependence

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses theoretical models for the composition dependence of equations of state and compares the quality of predictions against experimental thermodynamic property data. The mean density approximation (MDA) and the van der Waals one-fluid (VDW1) model are compared with hybrid mixing rules (HMR), in which rigorous composition dependence is used for the second and third virial coefficients and the conformai solution model is used for equation-of-state density terms beyond the third virial term. It is found that when values of unity are used for all binary and three-body unlike interaction parameters, calculated densities for methane-normal heptane mixtures have average absolute deviations of 3.54% for MDA, 4.04% for VDW1, and 2.59% for HMR. When vapor-liquid equilibrium calculations were performed for the methane-normal heptane system, average absolute deviations of calculatedK values from experimental values were 16.7% for methane and 36.4% for normal heptane using HMR, whereas when conformal solution model (CSM) mixing rules were used, the results were 34.8% for methane and 66.7% for normal heptane. When the binary interaction parameter for the characterization of interaction energies is determined, it is found to be less sensitive to state conditions in the case of HMR than either MDA or VDW1. These preliminary results suggest the potential of mixture equation-of-state methods which utilize rigorous composition dependence for the lower-order virial coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. L. Huber and J. F. Ely,Fluid Phase Equil. 37:105 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Chen, J. F. Ely, and G. A. Mansoori,Fluid Phase Equil. 37:1 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. H. Li, F. T. H. Chung, C.-K. So, L. L. Lee, and K. E. Starling,ACS Symp. Ser. Eq. Stale Theor. Appl. 300(12):250 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. A. Khan, M. H. Li, L. L. Lee, and K. E. Starling,Fluid Phase Equil. 37:141 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. M. Mansoori and T. W. Leland,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 68:320 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. R. Brulé, C. T. Lin, L. L. Lee, and K. E. Starling,AIChE J. 28:616 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. W. Leland, J. S. Rowlinson, and G. A. Sather,Trans. Faraday Soc. 64:1447 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. J. Lee, L. L. Lee, and K. E. Starling,Equations of State in Engineering and Research, 125 Advances in Chemistry Series (American Chemical Society, 1979).

  9. H. H. Reamer, B. H. Sage, and W. H. Lacey,Ind. Eng. Chem. Chem. Eng. Data Ser. 1(1):29 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, M.A., Mannan, M., Lee, L.L. et al. Mixture equations of state: Composition dependence. Int J Thermophys 11, 373–380 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133568

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133568

Key words

Navigation