Skip to main content
Log in

Redistribution and mobility of uranium during the metamorphism of volcanogenic formations

  • Articles
  • Published:
Soviet Atomic Energy Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Effusive and intrusive petrochemical analogs differ considerably as regards their content of ordinary and mobile uranium. This is because of the fundamentally differing conditions of solidification of the chemically identical melts.

  2. 2.

    As products of the rapid supercooling of aluminosilicate melts, effusives mechanically capture all the uranium dissipated within them, and as a result of the metastable state of the main mass fail to transfer this uranium to solutions without the complete chemical decomposition of the material composing them.

  3. 3.

    The initial concentration and distribution of the uranium in volcanogenic rocks are altered when epigenetic processes associated with tectonic magmatism and metamorphism develop on the large scale. As they develop regional, local, contact, and hydrothermal forms of metamorphism lead to the appearance of different amounts of mobile uranium and to a change in the original content. Ultrametamorphism leads to the greatest losses of uranium.

  4. 4.

    The most promising sites as regards the discovery of uranium ore-formation are regions of acid volcanism having widely evident areas of low- and medium-temperature hydrothermal metamorphism, with traces of later tectono-magmatic activization. No less favorable are regions corresponding to the propagation of early volcanogenic accumulations of the same composition which have experienced metamorphism of the greenschist facies and then been subjected to hydrothermal action.

Thus the uranium contained in volcanogenic rocks can only migrate after fundamental recrystallization of the rock-forming material, or after its complete decomposition, which may be effected either in metamorphic processes or alternatively in exogenic processes in which chemical decomposition of the rocks takes place. Effusive—explosive formations usually undergo the greatest metamorphic transformations in the epigenetic stage of their existence (a long time after the extinction of the volcanos), by virtue of the appearance of a superimposed deep tectono-magmatism influencing and basically modifying the volcanogenic strata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. I. Adams, Nuclear Geology, New York (1954).

  2. I. Rocholt et al., Econ. Geol.,66, 1061 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. N. Shatkova and G. A. Shatkov, Geologiya Rudnykh Mestorozhdenii, No. 4, 36 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. P. Kovalev, Uranium and Thorium in Magmatic and Metamorphic Rocks in the Central Part of the Altae-Sayan Folded Region [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. P. Kovalev, Radioactive Elements in Rocks [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1975), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. L. Leonova and N. I. Udal'tsova, Geochemistry of Uranium and Thorium in the Volcanic Process, the Kurile-Kamchatka Region Being Taken as an Example [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Smyslov, Uranium and Thorium in the Earth's Crust [in Russian], Nedra, Leningrad (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. E. Smorchkov, in: Geology of Hydrothermal Uranium Sites [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. P. Kovalev and Z. V. Malyasova, Geokhimiya, No. 7, 855 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. V. Kukolev, Chemistry of Silicon and Physical Chemistry of Silicates [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Sylwestrzak, Bull. Institut Geol., Warsaw (259),21, 5 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. P. Eliseeva, B. I. Omel'yanenko, and I. E. Smorchkov, Zap. Vsesoyuz. Mineralog. Obshch.,103, 508 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Neuerburg, I. Antweiler, and B. Bieler, 20th Intern. Geol. Congress, Abstracts, Mexico (1956), p. 221.

  14. N. A. Kulik, S. V. Mel'gunov, and V. M. Gavshin, in: Radioactive Elements in Rocks [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1975), p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. S. Mitropol'skii, V. P. Kovalev, and S. V. Mel'gunov, in: Geochemistry and Conditions of Gold and Rare-Metal Ore Formation [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1972), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 85–91, August, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovalev, V.P., Nozhkin, A.D., Mironov, A.G. et al. Redistribution and mobility of uranium during the metamorphism of volcanogenic formations. At Energy 41, 697–703 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132642

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132642

Keywords

Navigation