Skip to main content
Log in

Potentiation of suprasegmental synaptic influences on alpha-motoneurons

  • Published:
Neuroscience Translations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The potentiation of mono-, di- and polysynaptic reticulospinal and vestibulospinal synaptic influences was studied in experiments on cats by intracellular recording of EPSPs and IPSPs of lumbar motoneurons and recording surface potentials from the spinal cord.

  2. 2.

    During paired stimulation, potentiation of short-latency EPSPs develops mainly from an increase in amplitude of the disynaptic PSP. This is shown by the magnitude of the corresponding segmental delay, the increase in the second component of the surface potential, the presence of heterosynaptic potentiation, and the sensitivity of the potentiated PSPs to nembutal and mephenesin.

  3. 3.

    Post-tetanic potentiation may be stronger in the case of polysynaptic EPSPs.

  4. 4.

    The question of the functional significance of the differences observed between potentiation of mono- and polysynaptic PSPs of suprasegmental origin is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SHAPOVALOV, A. I. In: GRANIT, R. (editor). First Nobel Symposium, Stockholm, 1966, p. 331.

  2. SHAPOVALOV, A. I. and E. B. ARUSHANYAN Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med. 66(6): 74, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SHAPOVALOV, A. I. and A. A. GRANTYN'. Biofizika. 13:260, 1968. (Translation published in Neuroscience Translations No. 6:734–742, 1968–69.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. SHAPOVALOV, A. I., A. A. GRANTYN' and G. G. KURCHAVYI. Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med. 64 (7):3, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SHAPOVALOV, A. I., G. G. KURCHAVYI, and M. P. STROGONOVA. Fiziol. Zh. SSSR. 52:1401, 1966. (Translation published in Neuroscience Translations, No. 1:91–100, 1967–68.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ECCLES, J. C. The Physiology of the Nerve Cell. Moscow, Foreign Literature Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CURTIS, D. R. and J. C. ECCLES. J. Physiol. (London) 150:374, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ECCLES, J. C., R. M. ECCLES and C. N. SHEALY. J. Neurophysiol. 25:544, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. EIDE, E., A. LUNDBERG and P. VOORHOEVE. Acta Physiol. Scand. 53:18, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LANDGREN, S., C. G. PHILLIPS and R. PORTER. J. Physiol. (London) 161:91, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LLOYD, D. P. C. J. Neurophysiol. 4:115, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LUND, S. and O. POMPEIANO. Experientia. 21:602, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PHILLIPS, C. G. and R. PORTER. Progr. Brain Res. 12:222, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  14. POMPEIANO, O. In: GRANIT, R. (editor). First Nobel Symposium, Stockholm, 1966, p. 349.

  15. RALL, W. In: REIES, R. (editor). Neural Theory and Modeling, Stanford Univ. Press, 1964.

  16. WILLIS, W. D., J. C. WILLIS and W. M. THOMPSON. J. Neurophysiol. 30:382, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapovalov, A.I., Saf'yants, V.I. Potentiation of suprasegmental synaptic influences on alpha-motoneurons. Neurosci Behav Physiol 2, 931–939 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124742

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124742

Keywords

Navigation