Skip to main content
Log in

Inservice training for urban day care centers: An evaluation of training strategies

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child care quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professional training for day care providers is being increasingly recognized as an avenue to improve the quality of child care. This article briefly describes two projects that offered training to urban day care centers. Based on the combined five years of training implemented, the relative utility of various training strategies is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almy, M. (1981). Education and training for day care: Implications for child care education.Child Care Quarterly, 10 226–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, R.L. (1981).The status of inservice training to prepare educators to work with handicapped students. Silver Springs, Maryland: Applied Management Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buescher, T.M., Banuelos, D., & Moore, S. (Eds.). (1982).Young children at-risk: Training resources for staff members in urban preschool programs. Detroit: Immersion Learning Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buescher, T.M. (1982).Immersion Learning Project: Final report. Report to sponsor, U.S. Department of Education, Special Education of Education, Special Education Program, DPP.

  • Buescher, T.M. & Parke, B.N. (1983, April).Using naturalistic observations to determine effects of inservice training on adult and child interactions to preschool programs for children at-risk. Paper presented at Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit, MI.

  • Buescher, T.M. & Stenroos, C. (1977).Final report: Inservice training for teachers of elementary school gifted children. Detroit Public Schools, ESEA Title VI Project.

  • Day, D., Perkins, E.P., & Winthaler, J.A. (1979). Naturalistic evaluation for program improvement.Young Children, 34 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divine-Hawkins, P. (1981).Family day care in the United States (DHHS Publication No. 80-30287). Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. (1981, November).Nutrition inservice education for urban day care providers: A comparison of three models. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for the Education of Young Children, Detroit, MI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 013 175)

  • Kaplan, M. & Conn, J. (1984). The effects of caregiver training on classroom setting and caregiver performance in eight community day care centers.The Child Study Journal, 14 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan M. & Smock, S. (1981).The Michigan Day Care Provider Training Program, Year 1: An evaluation. Detroit, MI: Center for Urban Studies, Wayne State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.R., Jr. (1982). The politics of federal day care regulation. In E.F. Zigler & E.R. Gordon (Eds.),Day care (pp. 267–306). Boston, Mass: Auburn House Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, C., Collier, A., Sparling, J., Loda, F., Campbell, F., Ingram, D., & Finkelstein, N. (1976). The Carolina Abecedarian Project: A longitudinal and multidisciplinary approach to the prevention of developmental retardation. In T.D. Tjossem (Ed.),Intervention strategies for high-risk infants and young children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Comptroller General. (1979)Report to the Congress: Early childhood and family development programs improve the quality of life for low-income families. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office.

  • Riegel, R.H. (1979).Developmental report No. 2: Inservice planning. Plymouth, MI: Model Resource Room Project, Plymouth-Canton Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roupp, R. (1979).Final report of the National Day Care Study: Children at the center. Cambridge, Mass: ABT Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Brooks, S., Goodman, K.S., & Meredith, R. (1976)Language and thinking in schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (1982). Inservice day care training programs: A review and analysis.Child Care Quarterly, 11 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelstein, E., Rubovits, P., Tucker, D., & Barden, M. (1976).Inservice training models for early childhood education programs. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 125 754)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is an expanded and modified form of two presentations by the authors at the annual meeting of the National Association for the Education of Young Children, Detroit, Michigan, December, 1981. The Immersion Learning Project was supported by a two-year Grant (G 000080014) from the Special Education Program area, U.S. Department of Education, to Wayne State University. Beverly N. Parke provided data collection and analysis services. Delma Bannelos assisted with training and on-site evaluation. The Preschool Nutrition Education Training Project was supported by a three-year grant (0959-15) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Michigan Department of Education, to the Health Care Institute at Wayne State University. Muriel Wagner, Sally Poux, and Dorothy Vaughan participated as nutrition trainers and consultants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, M.G., Buescher, T.M. Inservice training for urban day care centers: An evaluation of training strategies. Child Youth Care Forum 15, 38–49 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01118992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01118992

Keywords

Navigation