Sociological Forum

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 357–382 | Cite as

Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to Mississippi Freedom Summer

  • Roberto M. Fernandez
  • Doug McAdam


This study explores the role of multiorganizational fields in recruitment to social movements. We study applicants to the 1964 Mississippi Freedom Summer project from two sites: the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Wisconsin at Madison. Using network analysis, we develop a model of recruitment that predicts participation on the basis of the structural positions of individuals within the multiorganizational fields, as well as on the basis of individual background factors. We also study the role that the recruitment context plays, by comparing the results at these two universities. Independent of the individual background factors, structural position in the multiorganizational field predicts participation in Freedom Summer at Wisconsin, but not at Berkeley. The effects of individual background factors on participation are also contingent on the recruitment context. We discuss the theoretical implications of our results for the study of the effects of multiorganizational fields and recruitment contexts on participation in social movements.


Social Network Network Analysis Social Issue Social Movement Theoretical Implication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich, John H. andForrest D. Nelson 1984 Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bolton, Charles D. 1972 “Alienation and action: A study of peace group members.” American Journal of Sociology 78:537–561.Google Scholar
  3. Bonacich, Phillip 1972 “Techniques for analyzing overlapping memberships.” In Herbert L. Costner (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1972: 176–185. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Breiger, Ronald L. 1974 “The duality of persons and groups.” Social Forces 53:181–189.Google Scholar
  5. Burt, Ronald S. 1980 “Models of network structure.” Annual Review of Sociology 6:79–141.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, James S., Elihu Katz, andHerbert Menzel 1966 Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. Curtis, Russell L. andLouis A. Zurcher, Jr. 1973 “Stable resources of protest movements: The multiorganizational field.” Social Forces 52:53–60.Google Scholar
  8. Draper, Hal 1965 Berkeley: The New Student Revolt. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez, Roberto M. and Doug McAdam Forthcoming “Multiorganizational fields and recruitment to social movements.” In Bert Klandermans (ed.), Organizing for Social Change: Social Movement Organizations Across Cultures. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fine, Gary Alan andRandy Stoecker 1985 “Can the circle be unbroken? Small groups and social movements.” Advances in Group Processes 2:1–28.Google Scholar
  11. Fireman, Bruce andWilliam A. Gamson 1979 “Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective.” In Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics: 8–44 Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  12. Gamson, William A., Bruce Fireman, andSteven Rytina 1982 Encounters with Unjust Authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hanushek, Eric A. andJohn E. Jackson 1977 Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, Michael L. 1974 “Sources of recruitment to Catholic Pentecostalism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13:49–64.Google Scholar
  15. 1968 The Beginning: Berkeley, 1964. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 1977 “Change of heart: A test of some widely held theories of religious conversion.” American Journal of Sociology 83:653–680.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, Craig 1983 “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–553.Google Scholar
  18. Knoke, David andRonald S. Burt 1983 “Prominence.” In Ronald S. Burt and Michael J. Minor (eds.), Applied Network Analysis: 195–222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Lipset, Seymour M. andSheldon Wolin 1965 The Berkeley Student Revolt. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  20. McAdam, Doug 1986 “Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92:64–90.Google Scholar
  21. Forthcoming The Idealists Revisited: The Personal and Societal Consequences of Mississippi Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McCarthy, John D. andMayer N. Zald 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.Google Scholar
  23. Meier, August andElliott Rudwick 1973 CORE, A Study in the Civil Rights Movement, 1942–1968. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 1981 “Black southern student sit-in movement: An analysis of internal organization.” American Sociological Review 46:744–767.Google Scholar
  25. 1984 The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York: Pree Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oliver, Pamela 1984 “‘If you don't do it, nobody else will’: Active and token contributors to local collective action.” American Sociological Review 49:601–610.Google Scholar
  27. Orum, Anthony 1972 Black Students in Protest: A Study of the Origins of the Black Student Movement. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Perrow, Charles 1970 “Members as resources in voluntary organizations.” In W. R. Rosengren and M. Lefton (eds.), Organizations and Clients: Essays in the Sociology of Service: 93–116. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  29. Petersen, Trond 1985 “A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models.” American Sociological Review 50:130–131.Google Scholar
  30. Rosenthal, Naomi, M. Fingrutd, M. Ethier, R. Karant, andD. McDonald 1985 “Social movements and network analysis: A case study of nineteenth-century women's reform in New York state.” American Journal of Sociology 90:1022–1054.Google Scholar
  31. Sale, Kirkpatrick 1973 SDS. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  32. 1980 “Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45:787–801.Google Scholar
  33. 1983 “Further thoughts on social networks and social movements.” Sociology 17:112–120.Google Scholar
  34. Stark, Rodney andWilliam Sims Bainbridge 1980 “Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects.” American Journal of Sociology 85:1376–1395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eastern Sociological Society 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto M. Fernandez
    • 1
  • Doug McAdam
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations